Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   26 comments, In Series: Economics

OpEdNews Op Eds

Official? Have Economists Declared that Longterm Unemployment For Millions is the New Normal, To Be Accepted

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 5   Must Read 3   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 3/3/14

Become a Fan
  (286 fans)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/60513726@N03/6961560497/: Occupy jobs - March 6, 2012
Occupy jobs - March 6, 2012
(image by Michael Fleshman)


BusinessInsider has an article Here's the Story About the Economy That Liberals Don't Want to Hear

The article suggests that in the past, liberals have been mostly correct, as compared to conservatives, on economic issues, particularly about inflation, public debt and cutting spending. But the article suggest that now, economists are starting to agree that there's no more room for working on long term employment. The article states:
" The liberal view is that there's tons of room for the Fed to be more aggressive in the pursuit of full employment.

Meanwhile, economists are starting to come to the conclusion that the job market is not far from being 'tight.'"

and the article adds,

" Up until recently, the left was very much in step with where the mainstream of economics was (more easing, wherever you can get it).

But daylight between the two is emerging. Economists are increasingly talking about a tightish job market."

The article concludes, " Meanwhile, the view of more and more people in the economics-sphere is that the job market is getting tight, and there's little more the Fed can do."

Okay, so that's a summary of the article. Reading between the lines, I see the beginning of a move to codify long term unemployment of millions of Americans. This kind of talk, to me, suggests that we need to get used to this level of unemployment, that it's the new normal, the new reality. Of course these are the same people who have been telling us for years that the rapacious trade agreements Clinton, Dubya and Obama have inflicted upon the US are inevitable and necessary. 

I don't buy either claim. They are claims designed to further the goals of multinational corporations that have no interest in the people of the US, and really, no interest in all but a handful of plutocrats. 

This is a malignant kind of economic thinking and philosophy based on profits for corporations. That seems totally rational to corporate supporters, sycophants and the religious extremists they dupe. But this set of economic values is certainly not what Jesus would want, nor Buddha. 

There's a different way of economic thinking, one that puts humans-- people-- first. That economic model would look at these scientific economists' claims that the job market was tightening and reject the idea entirely. That human model of economics would argue that the system is broken and corporations and the government are obligated to provide jobs for every person who wants to work. Why, because work is not simply a resource to produce goods for consumption and for profits. Here's what E. F. Schumacher wrote, in his chapter on Buddhist Economics, in his landmark book, Small Is Beautiful:

"The Buddhist point of view takes the function of work to be at least threefold: to give a man a chance to utilize and develop his faculties; to enable him to overcome his ego-centeredness by joining with other people in a common task; and to bring forth the goods and services needed for a becoming existence. Again, the consequences that flow from this view are endless. To organize work in such a manner that it becomes meaningless, boring, stultifying, or nerveracking for the worker would be little short of criminal; it would indicate a greater concern with goods than with people, an evil lack of compassion and a soul-destroying degree of attachment to the most primitive side of this worldly existence. Equally, to strive for leisure as an alternative to work would be considered a complete misunderstanding of one of the basic truths of human existence, namely, that work and leisure are complementary parts of the same living process and cannot be separated without destroying the joy of work and the bliss of leisure.

From the Buddhist point of view, there are therefore two types of mechanization which must be clearly distinguished: one that enhances a man's skill and power and one that turns the work of man over to a mechanical slave. How to tell one from the other? "The craftsman himself", says Ananda Coomaraswamy, a man equally competent to talk about the Modern West as the Ancient East, "the craftsman himself can always, if allowed to, draw the delicate distinction between the machine and the tool. The carpet loom is a tool, a contrivance for holding warp threads at a stretch for the pile to be woven round them by the craftsman's fingers; but the power loom is a machine, and its significance as a destroyer of culture lies in the fact that it does the essentially human part of the work". It is clear, therefore, that Buddhist economics must be very different from the economics of modern materialism, since the Buddhist sees the essence of civilization not in the multiplication of wants but in the purification of human character. Character, at the same time, is formed primarily by a man's work. And work, properly conducted in conditions of human dignity and freedom, blesses those who do it and equally their products. The Indian philospher and economist J.C.Kumarappa sums up the matter as follows:

"If the nature of the work is properly appreciated and applied, it will stand in the same relation to the higher faculties as food is to the physical body. It nourishes and enlivens the higher man and urges him to produce the best he is capable of. It directs his freewill along the proper course and disciplines the animal in him into progressive channels. It furnishes an excellent background for man to display his scale of values and develop his personality."

This way of thinking would not consider an unemployment rate above six percent as acceptable. It would characterize it as a sickness that, for the sake of justice and humanity, must be cured. 

As we move forward, replacing the top-down world of domination and billionaires, plutocrats and predator corporations with bottom-up values and organizations that value humans and put them above things, it will be necessary to repudiate the existing corporations first, sociopathic predator economic model. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 26 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Economist for the most part are just tools of the ... by kappie on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:29:57 AM
"They are claims designed to further the goals o... by KurtB on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:56:06 AM
Rob,s very Interesting article ______ Kirt is RIGH... by jean labrek on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:19:19 PM
On the other hand...given the persistence of the ... by molly cruz on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:16:08 AM
Mr. Kall, not only are economists resigned to mill... by Larry Butler on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:22:22 AM
Maybe the Conference Board's data http://g... by Robert Bostick on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:22:23 AM
Quite so.The Business Insider article gives away t... by Scott Baker on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:52:26 AM
Good article.  I question, however, the u... by Janet Gaudiello on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:25:09 AM
Inequality, by reducing spending and increasing s... by George Flower on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:47:30 AM
"This will be a jobless recovery"  said Obam... by Textynn N on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:23:17 PM
I remember my 20s as an IBEW Wirenut (inside name0... by Michael Dewey on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:37:35 PM
Molly, What's truly aggravating is The Big Lie... by Robert Bostick on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:54:44 PM
RobThank you for this article.  You and I and... by Wupatki on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:34:13 PM
We watched the Oscars last night, sponsored in pa... by Derryl Hermanutz on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:29:03 PM
My lips curl in disgust every time I see that Cad... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:48:04 AM
It's called 'structural Insecurity' - coined by t... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:46:16 PM
Economists., like everyone else tends to give the... by Paul Repstock on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:08:18 AM
While the "Buddhist " view of work sounds really g... by Gregory Kozloff on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:20:33 AM
That is why we have to change the rules governing... by Paul Repstock on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:41:43 AM
Paul,What changes to the "rules" governing our li... by Gregory Kozloff on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:50:10 AM
Changes to the system, to the current reality star... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:52:01 AM
Economics as presently practiced has been called ... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:27:43 AM
Look, the reason I come here, read the articles, c... by Gregory Kozloff on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:38:14 PM
Hope this video of being number 9 of the Beatles ... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:39:34 PM
I was partner with two physicians in a small busin... by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:26:42 AM
The scope of corporations has been exponentially e... by John Rachel on Thursday, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:44:23 PM