OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama's Two Step Healthcare Strategy

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/19/09

Become a Fan
  (21 fans)
After five months, President Barack Obama's managerial style has become obvious. He's focused on his top priorities and he's collaborative and pragmatic; his operating instructions are "never let the perfect be the enemy of the good." This summer, Obama's leadership will put to the test as he struggles to get Congress to pass comprehensive healthcare legislation.

America's 44th President outlined his healthcare proposals in a speech to the American Medical Association. His plan guarantees access to healthcare for every American. It mandates health insurance for children and guarantees affordable care to adults with a "hardship waiver" for the poor.

While the Obama plan makes affordable health insurance widely available, it lets individuals decide whether or not they want to keep their current plan and doctor. Featuring a "one-stop shop for a health care plan" the Health Insurance Exchange Americans "will have [a] choice of a number of plans" including a public option.

While conservative Republicans have complained about all aspects of the Obama plan some going so far as to deny that the US has a healthcare crisis there are two primary areas of conflict. One is cost. Obama estimates "Making health care affordable for all Americans will cost somewhere on the order of one trillion dollars over the next ten years." While that's a lot of money, the President notes: "failing to reform our health care system in a way that genuinely reduces cost growth will us trillions of dollars more in lost economic growth and lower wages." He plans to raise the trillion dollars through a combination of tax increases for wealthy Americans and cost reductions achieved by making existing services more efficient.

But having a healthcare plan that includes everyone may cost a lot more than $1 trillion. An analysis from the Congressional Budget Office indicates that covering everyone will cost $1.6 trillion.

The other area of conflict is the provision of a public option. Republicans rail against this even though the well-regarded Medicare program is an example of a public option and accuse Obama of laying the groundwork for a single-payer plan. Nonetheless, most Democrats believe that a public option is necessary to provide real competition in the health insurance marketplace.

In May, conservative pollster Frank Luntz wrote a memo to Republicans advising them how to defeat Obama's healthcare initiative. Luntz suggested the GOP argue: "President Obama wants to put the Washington bureaucrats in charge of healthcare... It could lead to the government setting standards of care, instead of doctors who really know what's best... It could lead to the government rationing care, making people stand in line and denying treatment like they do in other countries with national healthcare."

Recognizing that it's politically unwise to totally oppose the Obama health care initiative, Republicans unveiled a health care plan featuring a combination of tax credits and changes to existing programs. It does not deal with several of the major concerns about the current system, such as failure to provide universal coverage and the nagging problem of exclusion because of pre-existing conditions.

On the other hand, many observers feel the Obama health care plan does not go far enough. Writing in THE NEW YORK REVIEW, Harvard Medical School Professor Emeritus Arnold Relman observes, "[Obama's plan] will expand insurance coverage in the short term, which is certainly needed, but... will create a system even less affordable than at present." "In seeking a consensus, Obama's health reform policies do not address the central causes of rising costs, and propose nothing likely to have much effect on them. He does not mention the ways that investor ownership and the fee-for-service payment system provide incentives for increasing costs..." Relman concludes that a singer-payer plan that eliminates private employment-based insurance isn't politically feasible.

Most liberal Democrats favor a single-payer plan. Faced with a pragmatic Obama Administration determined to push through less-than-optimal health care reform, liberals are faced with a tough decision. They can go down fighting for single-payer probably combine with conservatives to deny Obama support for the passage of his incremental plan or they can hold their noses and pass healthcare legislation that solves many but not all of the problems with the current system.

There appear to be two critical components of the current Obama plan: universal access to health insurance and the public option. So long as these stay in the legislation, Democrats should support it.

Because Obama is pragmatic, many of his initiatives will have to go through several stages. That was true of the stimulus bill; it solved some but not all problems and a further bill will be necessary. The same two-step approach will have to happen with Healthcare. Obama's first step deals with the most egregious problems with the current system, but doesn't adequately contain costs. Those will have to be dealt with by future legislation that proposes a workable solution: a single-payer plan.

 

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So where is the good?... by Jack Harrington on Friday, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:30:34 PM
President Obama does NOT seem to be on a track to ... by August Adams on Friday, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:57:12 PM
Our ER's are overun with uninsured folks. Thos... by Linda Bailey on Saturday, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:42:24 AM
Obamas plan is worthless because it does nothing e... by liberalsrock on Saturday, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:55:05 AM