It's the price of oil, stupid! The most recent Gallup Poll shows three issues dominating the 2008 presidential election: "energy, including gas prices," "the economy," and "the situation in Iraq." Oil connects these concerns and also the prospect of global climate change. To win in November, Barack Obama has to focus on America's oil problem.
Over the past year, gasoline prices have skyrocketed throughout the U.S. – in Northern California the price of a gallon of gas is close to $5 a gallon, up 37 percent. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average household now spends more than one sixth of their annual expenditures on transportation and this percentage is rapidly increasing, forcing families to forego items like healthcare in order to fill their tanks.
The rapid increase in the cost of petroleum is a key component in America's economic downturn. It affects the price of food – 13 percent of the typical family's annual expenditures – because most foodstuffs have to be transported long distances from the farm to the consumer. And, it dramatically impacts housing expenses – 33 percent of our average annual expenditures – that were already on the rise because of tightening credit markets. Where it was once convenient to live in suburban communities, because housing prices were lower than in urban centers, that's no longer the case since the cost of commuting has become prohibitive. Unfortunately, the influx of former long-distance commuters, forced by rising transportation costs to return to the inner city, is driving metropolitan housing prices further up.
The meteoric rise of gasoline prices is another indication Americans are stuck in an unsustainable lifestyle. We consume 21 million barrels of oil per day, but produce only 5 million. And, the situation is only going to get worse as we use 25 percent of the world's oil supply but possess only 3 percent of the reserves.
While most Americans understand the connection between rising oil prices and our deteriorating economy, for many the relationship between oil and Iraq has remained opaque. Nonetheless, as the war has dragged on, gasoline prices have more than doubled – in California, just before the war began, the average price for a gallon of gas was $1.72, now it is $4.46. Many observers believe the U.S. subjugation contributed to the rising cost of petroleum because it disrupted the supply of Iraqi crude and threatened supplies from neighboring oil states. Rather than the occupation paying for itself because of the availability of cheap Iraqi oil, as the Bush Administration claimed in 2003, it has cost more than half a trillion dollars with no end in sight.
For all these reasons, Senator Obama must make oil the cornerstone issue of his campaign. First, he has to get the attention of panicky voters overwhelmed by rising gasoline prices and desperate for a quick fix. He should declare unequivocally that America's problem is an addiction: we've developed an unsustainable dependence on oil. His message should be: we're all in this together, because we're a nation of petroleum addicts.
Second, Obama has to differentiate his solutions from John McCain's slapdash proposals. Obama should acknowledge there is no quick fix for the problems of those who are totally dependent upon their cars or trucks. America can't drill its way out of our oil shortage and short-term palliatives, such as suspending the gasoline tax or strong-arming Saudis to increase production, aren't the answer.
Third, he must emphasize conservation. In 2001, Vice-President Cheney quipped, "Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy." Obama has to repudiate this thinking – identify it as a Bush Administration leadership failure – and state that kicking our oil addiction requires a national commitment to conservation and energy efficiency. He should ask all Americans to make personal sacrifices for the common good – something George Bush failed to do after 9/11.
Fourth, Obama has to prescribe a common-sense economic plan to provide immediate relief for America's working families. He has proposed an economic stimulus package that would provide a host of benefits for those overwhelmed by transportation costs. Now he has to make these more attractive than McCain's "no gas tax" alternative.
Fifth, Obama must provide a vision of a new America by showing the electorate the path to energy independence, a future without oil. He has proposed a comprehensive strategy for a clean energy future that would invest $150 Billion over 10 Years in alternative technology including " the next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure," "commercialization of plug-in hybrids," and "development of commercial-scale renewable energy."
Finally, Barack Obama has to infuse his "let's kick the oil habit" sermon with galvanizing emotion, turn it into a moral crusade that all Americans can get behind. He understands our oil problems and has proposed a workable short-term plan and long-term strategy, but so far this hasn't captured voters' imagination. To take advantage of his oil opportunity, Obama must use his rhetorical skills to inspire Americans to work together for a sustainable future.
Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and Quaker actvist. He is particularly interested in progressive morality and writes frequently on the ethical aspects of political and social issues.
A spotlight is shining directly on Oil and so it is a very timely point of debate. I would love to hear a candidate say that -
George Bush invaded Iraq to take over their oil resources; and what was the result of that plan -
Gas is more and more expensive, so for the poor it is a whole lot of hurt as even food prices are getting more and more expensive as food growing and transport need oil. The middle class feel squeezed as they find their pay is no longer adequate to maintain their style of living. The big oil executives are making record profits and so for them everything is just fine.
If I am President I will take immediate steps to replace our addiction to oil to totally FREE and PLENTIFUL energy from solar and wind. We will pay for this by cutting the defense spending by 25%. We will cut the defense budget by pulling all troops out of foreign countries and put our National Guard units to work constructing these new power generating stations throughout the nation. Since these power generating stations are being built out of your tax dollars you will get the direct benefits of free electricity. I'd also direct NASA to develop and place into orbit a Global Power Satellite(s) that will provide solar energy continuously.
These actions are the exact same actions needed to combat global warming. Our most prominent scientist has told us that unless we take action immediately our planet could very possibly reach a tipping point that would mean that it is too late to avoid catastrophic consequences.
You see my fellow Americans and my fellow World Leaders we need to take action now to phase out the use of fosil fuels wherever possible. To wage war over oil only benefits the big oil corporations and the military-industrial complex. The only plan that benefits the American people and the peoples of the entire world is to stop using oil.
by
Philip Pease (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 128 comments)
on Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 2:30:23 PM
1 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
