Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Well Said 7   Supported 5   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/15/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (25 comments)

Obama's Newest Strategy Will Fail; Here's How to Turn The Tide Against the GOP

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The new White House strategy is to show how Republicans are the party of no, by showcasing their answers and comments on poll-friendly issues.

This is not going to work. They may feel good, making republicans look bad, but the main strategy that this tactic is based upon is a loser.

The American people are justifiably furious that they gave their trust to Obama and the congressional democrats and that confidence was betrayed. Obama and Reid in particular failed to keep promises, failed to wield the power they were entrusted to make real change happen.

Now, Obama and company want to set up scenarios where they can more clearly document the excuses.

The American people don't want better excuses. They want results. They want competent, effective leadership that makes things happen.

I ran a poll, primarily among progressives, asking how they felt about Obama's efforts to reform healthcare.

Are You Happy With Obama's Health Care Efforts?
Six percent were happy with Obama's efforts. Five percent didn't want him tampering with their health care (the teapartyer position) and 89% said Obama had not done enough. So, when you read those polls saying people are not happy with Obama's health care efforts, don't assume that they don't want him doing anything. Assume that a lot of people are angry that he has not done enough.

Sure the Republicans are being oppositional. That's their strategy. They determined that the gains for the strategy were greater than the liability.

The American people are really disgusted. Less and less Obama supporters are hanging in there, trusting Obama and congress to deliver. More and more are concluding that the Democrats have failed to do the job they were elected to do. Independents are leaning Republican. Democrats are leaning on the arms of their sofas and they're not going to get out and vote, let alone, expend energy campaigning for incumbents they are disappointed with.

There's a solution. It's not pretty. It carries some risk. But continuing with the "show how bad the Republicans are" strategy will not work. It is dooming the Democratic party to disaster in 2010 and 2012.

The solution is something a lot of people, like Howard Dean and Bernie Sanders, are saying-- the Democrats and Obama need to get a spine. They need to get very tough with Republicans.

First, the architects of the "show how bad the Republicans are" strategy should be immediately fired and replaced with real, tough leaders. That probably means dumping a load of former Clinton staffers-- DLCers who have leaned right, and tried to move the Democratic party to the right.

Next, develop a strategy that gets things done. Some of my progressive colleagues will disagree, but I say use interim appointments to fill empty posts-- scores of them. And empty more posts. Clear out ALL the lingering Bush/Rove political appointees still holding jobs-- every one of them. Then use interim appointments, since GOP senators are blocking normal appointments. Show the American people you're not going to be stopped by GOP strategies. Show that Democrats are smarter, better, more effective leaders that get things done. This will be a novel concept, considering that currently, even if some things have been accomplished, the narrative is telling a story of failure. When this interim appointment strategy is acted on, have in place plans to minimize and neutralize attacks that the GOP will surely initiate. Don't try to convince hard-core right wingers. Aim at convincing independents, where there's some hope of reaching them.

Next, use reconciliation, which requires 50 votes plus Biden to pass a slew of bills. Break a record for using reconciliation. If Harry Reid doesn't want to use reconciliation, replace him. Matter of fact, remove all senators who won't be back next year from leadership positions-- Dodd in particular. Put in people who need to keep their jobs.

Start installing in legislation that involves funding wording so that states where both senators don't support the bill don't get the funding.

Now, reconciliation is only used for funding bills. That's okay. Take the reform issues that are most urgent-- equal treatment for women, ending pre-existing conditions and recision policies-- and pass them the old fashioned way. There are Republicans who have always been willing to vote for them. Those issues will fly through.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Rob, where's the beef? by Peter Warner on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:49:12 PM
Obama is Center of Corruption, Talks Left, but is Right by Philip Dennany on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:44:05 PM
A Little Less Shrill, a Lot More Results by Woody Smith on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:47:51 PM
Seems like you have two solid articles here by Rob Kall on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:39:39 PM
Bravo! by Scott Baker on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:10:32 PM
Check my reply below... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:36:11 PM
Rules only apply to others - not to you. by Ken Scott on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:37:13 PM
I like the ideas... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:20:37 PM
I'm trying this again... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:29:39 PM
I agree with everything you say, except..... by Bob Ryley on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:47:18 PM
not government run journalism by Rob Kall on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:46:38 PM
Funding is just "picking the team" by Kyle Griffith on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:07:31 PM
Shoulda, woulda, coulda.... by Michael Shaw on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:12:04 PM
The tide has already turned. by Kyle Griffith on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:38:21 PM
It's not Republicans by Miriam Callaghan on Monday, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:21:02 PM
I used to fancy myself as being progressive by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:31:22 AM
There's plenty of money by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:19:36 AM
Guys...Obama is to the right of the DLC by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:50:06 AM
nice to make things up by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:06:19 AM
Dems by mary calese on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:20:42 AM
Time to get behind a third party by Philip Pease on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:01:06 AM
where's the confusion? by Your Friend Fairpay on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:26:14 AM
where's the confusion ? by sommers on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:37:47 AM
Your points are excellent by Charlotte Wilson on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:36:53 AM
Obama's Newest Strategy .... by Malvi Lennon on Tuesday, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:41:37 PM