Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 9 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama on Drugs: 98% Cheney?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 8/14/09

Become a Fan
  (57 fans)
- Advertisement -
I searched all over the newspapers and TV transcripts and no one asked the President what is probably the most important question of what passes for debate on the issue of health care reform: $80 billion of WHAT?

On June 22, President Obama said he'd reached agreement with big drug companies to cut the price of medicine by $80 billion. He extended his gratitude to Big Pharma for the deal that would, "reduce the punishing inflation in health care costs."

Hey, in my neighborhood, people think $80 billion is a lot of money. But is it?

I checked out the government's health stats (at, put fresh batteries in my calculator and totted up US spending on prescription drugs projected by the government for the next ten years. It added up to $3.6 trillion.

In other words, Obama's big deal with Big Pharma saves $80 billion out of a total $3.6 trillion. That's 2%.

Hey thanks, Barack! You really stuck it to the big boys. You saved America from these drug lords robbing us blind. Two percent. Cool!


Now it's Let's Make a Deal with hospital lobbyists.

First, the President was caught with his principals down, cutting a scuzzy back-room deal with pharmaceutical lobbyist Billy Tauzin to limit drug price savings to just 2% over 10 years (see attached, "Obama on Drugs: 98% Cheney?"), the New York Times today reports that another deal was sealed by lobbyist Chip Kahn of the American Hospital Association.

- Advertisement -

Here are the numbers they don't want you to see: Hospitals will be allowed to hike their prices and revenues by six trillion dollars ($5,853 billion) over the next ten years, only $155 billion less than they had projected before the Obama "reform."

In all, the Obama back-room deal will "reduce" our $26 trillion total hospital bill over the next decade by one-half of one percent.

Once again, the lobbyists got the gold mine, the public got the shaft.

Say it ain't so, Mr. President.


- Advertisement -

For perspective: Imagine you are in a Wal-Mart and there's a sign over a flat screen TV, "BIG SAVINGS!" So, you break every promise you made never to buy from that union-busting big box - and snatch up the $500 television. And when you're caught by your spouse, you say, "But, honey, look at the deal I got! It was TWO-PERCENT OFF! I saved us $10!"

But 2% is better than nothing, I suppose. Or is it?

The Big Pharma kingpins did not actually agree to cut their prices. Their promise with Obama is something a little oilier: they apparently promised that, over ten years, they will reduce the amount at which they would otherwise raise drug prices. Got that? In other words, the Obama deal locks in a doubling of drug costs, projected to rise over the period of "savings" from a quarter trillion dollars a year to half a trillion dollars a year. Minus that 2%.

Next Page  1  |  2

Author of the New York Times and international bestsellers, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse, Palast is Patron of the Trinity College Philosophical Society, an honor previously held by Jonathan Swift and Oscar Wilde. Palast (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

UAW Files Charges Against Romney for Auto Bail-Out Profiteering

Aaron Swartz Died For Piers Morgan's Sins

The Confidential Memo at the Heart of the Global Financial Crisis

The Right Testicle of Hell: History of a Haitian Holocaust

GREECE'D: We Voted 'No' to slavery, but 'Yes' to our chains

Obama is a two-faced liar. Aw-RIGHT!


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You can see how the swine flu is being hyped to va... by Michael Lee on Friday, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:16:41 PM
The fact that Americans aren't screaming at the to... by August Adams on Friday, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:38:14 PM
NO!!! Not until the sheep grab the shears and sta... by boomerang on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:03:50 PM
Thanks for your excellent article. It is great to ... by Nathan Nahm on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:31:20 AM
more and more aptly with each passing day. Of cour... by richard on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:21:54 AM
Is this any surprise to anyone? Look at phony "bud... by Starbuck on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:07:05 PM
polititions who suck the $ lactating corporate tit... by Stanimal on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:01:30 PM
Especially now when the Swine flu vaccine is about... by Mel Smith on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:58:34 PM
There's also the fact that big pharma will simply ... by Perry Logan on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:05:57 AM
Reality intrudes. The cost of bringing a new drug ... by sesquiculus on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:01:23 AM
This "deal" reminds me of the deal Obama got from ... by Scott Baker on Monday, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:51:17 AM