Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama confirms new law passed to deprive citizens of jury trial

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ralph Lopez     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/22/14

- Advertisement -
Originally published at Digital Journal


(image by US Army on Flickr)   DMCA


As reelection nears for the 350 congressmen who voted in favor of continuing a new law commonly referred to as "NDAA," President Barack Obama confirms in an interview that the law allows US citizens to be detained by the US military indefinitely.

Americans can now be arrested on American soil, and held without charges or trial for the duration of the "war on terror," on suspicion of being "associated" with terrorism. Determinations are made in secret by the executive branch.

The citizen can then be held incommunicado "until the end of hostilities." No one need be told the citizen's whereabouts, nor even that he or she has been arrested.

The most recent renewal of the bill, HR 641 in the House of Representatives, took place last year by a vote of 350-69 in the House, with 13 abstaining. All US congressmen are up for reelection every two years. The law has sparked a grassroots movement in opposition to it which may impact the congressional elections.
- Advertisement -


2014 has so far drawn a bumper crop of congressional challengers in both Democratic and Republican primaries, and in the general election in November. Some candidates have already made an issue out of NDAA. In California alone there are over 200 challengers in primaries and in the general election, vying for 53 congressional seats.

[LIST OF ALL US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATES TO DATE, BY DISTRICT] [SOURCE]

[HOUSE ROLL CALL VOTE, "YEA" IS IN FAVOR OF MILITARY DETENTION OF US CITIZENS]

- Advertisement -
Obama told former Fox News anchor Ben Swann, in a wide-ranging interview, that he only signed the bill so that the Pentagon would not be without financing, and so that soldiers could get paid. The military detention language was part of a broader spending bill.

Obama told Swann:
" I also said that a US citizen can never be subject to that kind of detention. Congress disagreed with me."
Obama laying the charge at Congress's feet, saying in essence that Congress sought to violate the rights of Americans, directly contradicts the claim by many congressmen who voted for the bill that the section on military detention excludes American citizens. The Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees citizens a "speedy and public" trial by jury "in all criminal prosecutions," with the right to challenge evidence and confront witnesses.

The law was first signed by Obama on New Years Eve of 2011.

In the interview, which took place in 2012, Obama held out hope that the courts would strike down the law he had signed. He told Swann:

"I also said a US citizen can never be subject to that kind of detention. Congress disagreed with me, and I didn't want to not be able to finance our military to pay our soldiers, our troops, and I signed the bill but what I also said was, look, I'm never going to use this power, and what I suspect is that the courts are going to agree with us over the long run."
However, the US Supreme Court recently let the law stand, after it was struck down as unconstitutional by Judge Katherine Forrest of the New York District Court. Among the plaintiffs in that lawsuit against the government, which alleged that the military detention section of the NDAA was unconstitutional, were Daniel Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky.

The passage of the NDAA has sparked a nationwide grassroots movement, which has not been reported in the major media, which seeks to blunt the impact of the law and call attention to its unconstitutionality. The movement has met with remarkable success in state houses and in local governments across the country. To date numerous states and dozens of localities, including Albany, NY, have passed or introduced some form of legislation which bars state and local law enforcement authorities from cooperating with federal authorities acting under the law, or which expresses some form of resistance to relinquishing citizens' rights.

Many in the movement have accused sitting congressmen who voted for the law of "treason" and betrayal of their oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Challengers to incumbents are already making their votes on NDAA an issue.

"I'm just a mom," Clark County, NV Citizen Opposes NDAA




Upon passage of the indefinite military detention provisions for the first time in 2011, Michigan Representative Justin Amash said that the law was "carefully crafted to mislead the public" into thinking that it did not apply to US citizens. Amash blocked an attempt by House leadership from both parties to pass the latest renewal of NDAA by a voice vote, which would have made it impossible to determine who voted for it or against it. Amash demanded a roll call vote.

Amash posted on his Facebook, after the most recent vote on NDAA, for the 2014 fiscal year:

"The bill does not address sec. 1021 of the 2012 NDAA, which unconstitutionally granted the President sweeping new power to indefinitely detain anyone, including American citizens inside the United States, without charge or trial."


Despite Obama's insistence in the Swann interview that he did not want to sign the bill as written, as outrage grew in 2012 over the passage of the provision, Michigan Democrat Senator Carl Levin said on the Senate floor that, in fact, it was the Obama administration which insisted on the language which included Americans, and that House and Senate committee members had already taken care to exempt Americans. Levin said that it was at the administration's request that the exemption was removed.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Vote out congressmen who voted for NDAA!

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.