Share on Google Plus
  2
Share on Twitter
  12
Share on Facebook
  43
Share on LinkedIn
  1
Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 58 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Will Launch a Huge Propaganda Blitz -- and May Attack Syria Even If He Loses the Vote in Congress

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 9/1/13

opednews.com

Source: Common Dreams


Grassroots pressure has forced President Obama to seek approval from Congress for an attack on Syria. But Obama is hell-bent on ordering a missile assault on that country, and he has two very important aces in the hole.

The administration is about to launch a ferocious propaganda blitz that will engulf a wide range of U.S. media. And as a fallback, the president is reserving the option of attacking Syria no matter what Congress does.

Until Obama's surprise announcement Saturday that he will formally ask Congress for authorization of military action against Syria, the impassioned pitches from top U.S. officials in late August seemed to be closing arguments before cruise missiles would hit Syrian targets. But the pre-bombing hyper spin has just gotten started.

The official appeals for making war on yet another country will be ferocious. Virtually all the stops will be pulled out; all kinds of media will be targeted; every kind of convoluted argument will be employed.

Hell hath no fury like war-makers scorned. Simmering rage will be palpable from political elites who do not want to see Congress set an unprecedented precedent: thwarting the will of a president who wants Pentagon firepower unleashed on another country.

President Obama and top Democrats such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will twist every arm they can to get a "yes" vote for attacking Syria. Meanwhile, most mainline media pundits, numbingly addicted to war, will often chastise and denigrate foes of authorization.

But we have a real chance to prevent a U.S. attack. One cogent argument after another, from intelligence veterans and policy analysts and weapons experts, has debunked the messaging for war on Syria. And some members of Congress -- not nearly enough, but some -- have begun to speak up with cogent opposition.

One of NPR's inside-the-box hosts of "All Things Considered" on August 30 asked Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) about the Obama administration's claim that missile strikes on Syria would be "a limited action" and not "war." Congresswoman Lofgren replied: "I think that anyone who argues that shooting missiles and dropping bombs on another country is not an act of war has got some further education warranted. If somebody shot cruise missiles at Washington for only one day, we would still consider it an act of war, wouldn't we?"

Not many members of Congress have Lofgren's clarity, and many of their votes on authorization are up for grabs. Each of us can help affect the outcome by demanding that our senators and representative oppose the war resolution. We should make our voices heard in all sorts of public venues.

The president's move for a congressional vote should cause a major escalation of anti-war activism. A straw in the wind: during just a few hours after Obama's announcement on Saturday afternoon, nearly 10,000 people took the initiative via RootsAction.org to email members of Congress with a "No Attack on Syria" message.

National opinion polling and momentum inside Congress indicate that we can defeat Obama's war resolution. It'll be a tremendous fight, but we can prevail.

But even if Obama loses the vote in Congress, there's a very real danger that he will proceed with ordering an attack on Syria.

Burying the lead almost a dozen paragraphs into a September 1 news story, the New York Times mentioned in passing: "White House officials indicated that Mr. Obama might still authorize force even if Congress rejected it."

A careful reading of Obama's Rose Garden announcement on Saturday verifies that he never quite said he will abide by the decision of Congress if it refuses to approve an attack on Syria. Instead, the president filled his statement with hedging phrases, detouring around any such commitment with words like these:

  • "I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets. " And I'm prepared to give that order. But ... I'm also mindful that I'm the President of the world's oldest constitutional democracy."
     
  • "I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people's representatives in Congress."
     
  • "Over the last several days, we've heard from members of Congress who want their voices to be heard. I absolutely agree. So this morning, I spoke with all four congressional leaders, and they've agreed to schedule a debate and then a vote as soon as Congress comes back into session." 
     
  • "And all of us should be accountable as we move forward, and that can only be accomplished with a vote." 
     
  • "I'm ready to act in the face of this outrage. Today I'm asking Congress to send a message to the world that we are ready to move forward together as one nation."

At the grassroots, people across the United States will be working very hard to prevent congressional approval of an attack on Syria. That activism is imperative. But we should also understand that Obama has not committed himself to abide by the decision that Congress makes.

 

Norman Solomon is the author of many books, including "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death," which has been adapted into a documentary film. For more information, go to: www.normansolomon.com
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize

Is MoveOn Less Progressive Than the New York Times Editorial Board?

What The Assault On Whistleblowers Has to Do With War on Syria

An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize

Obama's Escalating War on Freedom of the Press

Which Members of Congress Are Standing Up for Economic Decency -- and Which "Progressives" Aren't

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Jewish lobby in America--AIPAC--which overtly ... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:29:44 PM
I am sick and tired of hearing this. It is the res... by Michael David Morrissey on Monday, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:33:18 AM
Our dear folks  of pure Anglo- Saxon origin a... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:11:49 AM
It appears Obama has been put on the never-ending ... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:50:55 AM
Syrian war explained.http://xrepublic.tv/node/5129... by Matthew Peters on Monday, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:08:57 PM
Why?... by James Tennier on Monday, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:13:17 PM
What a joke!  He went to John McCain and his ... by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:33:56 AM
  Some lose all sense of propriety when they ... by Howard Lewis on Wednesday, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:11:54 PM
This is the David Ikes theory about the Earth ... by paulvcassidy on Monday, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:25:58 PM