Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   17 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Should Have Seized Power in the Gulf Tragedy: Harry Truman Would Have

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/23/10

Observing the continuing tragedy on America's Gulf Coast as reported day by day prompts me to think of the bold and decisive act by President Harry Truman in a case with which legal scholars are highly familiar.

The 1952 case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company vs. Sawyer was the outgrowth of a strike launched by steel workers during the Korean War.

Truman seized control of the steel mills, using a "theater of war" argument linked to his executive power as the nation's commander in chief during an emergency, in this case the Korean War.

The seizure resulted in steel company lawyers making a late night visit to a D.C. federal district court judge. This prompted a series of quick actions resulting with the U.S. Supreme Court deciding the case.

While the verdict went against Truman by a 6-3 margin, with Chief Justice Fred Vinson being one of the dissenters, the case cut so close to the heart of vital constitutional issues relating to presidential power that Justice Hugo Black's majority opinion was qualified by concurring opinions on the part of the five other justices, making it difficult to determine the details and limits of presidential power to seize private property in emergencies.

This decision stuck so hard in Truman's craw that he wrote about the case prominently in his memoirs. He was adamant in believing that he was within his rights as president to seize the steel mills, asserting that had there been a strong advocate on the court such as an Oliver Wendell Holmes or Benjamin Cardozo that the result would have been different.

That famous case came to mind as I watched regular nightly on the scene reports from CNN's Anderson Cooper in which the pain was glued to the faces of those suffering from the calamity that has been wrongly labeled a "spill" as in "crying over spilled milk" when even such strong words as national tragedy or calamity seem clearly inadequate.

The extent of the calamity became particularly evident in BP CEO Tony Hayward's testimony before Congress. As one television analyst who is also a lawyer put it, the impression from his non-responsive answers to repeated questions was that he had been "lawyered up," meaning rehearsed not to answer for fear of subsequent liability difficulties.

The incident did not bother Hayward to the point where he could not go out and participate in a yacht race. Don't chief executive officers deserve to have a good time?

From the outset of this tragedy British Petroleum has had one major interest, and that is protecting the oil conglomerate. When cleanup crews on Gulf beaches went to work what was BP's response? There was major concern over crew members wearing protective outfits.

BP was concerned by the legal picture and did not want to be associated in the public mind with the kind of dangers that prompted wearing such outfits.

Even when BP officials have attempted to appear caring and compassionate they have fallen all over themselves. For instance, there was the recent comment from a BP official that the super wealthy corporation cares about the "small people."

When it became apparent that BP was not doing an adequate job and that the tragedy was increasing by the day executive action was justified. How would you define what happened other than as a national emergency?

If executive action is not justified by a national emergency then when is it justifiable?

President Obama's recent speech to the nation about the Gulf oil tragedy was symptomatic of his problem. He is known for his collegiality, a major factor in him being chosen as president of the Harvard Law Review.

In his speech Obama kept referring to the many honors and distinctions held by those who were investigating the tragedy. Are the folks on the Gulf concerned about the backgrounds of people on Obama's watch?

Next Page  1  |  2


Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

looking out to such a degree for themselves legall... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:08:57 AM
took on the U.S. bank. He would have taken on Brit... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:09:57 AM
would have cried foul as well as socialism but the... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:11:01 AM
on the U.S. Gulf Coast have cried "socialism" if a... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:12:20 AM
the moment and this was one of those occasions whe... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:13:41 AM
If Jesus were alive today,Obama he would ream,For ... by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:05:48 PM
in a very entertaining way, Jeff. Thanks for your... by Bill Hare on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:33:35 PM
What exactly could Obama have done? What could any... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:37:52 AM
but was a realistic picture of the tragedy befalli... by Bill Hare on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:04:20 AM
Obama failed because his first consideration was p... by Perry Logan on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:05:29 AM
of the kind of medicine that we might hate to take... by Bill Hare on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:08:07 AM
then or today? I guess the "Right" does NOT have ... by Chris Bieber on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:44:42 AM
of the points stated in a very rambling commentary... by Bill Hare on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:14:24 AM
Obama was a senator and a university professor and... by Arthur M. Howard-(Scotoni) on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:09:25 PM
mold individuals with leadership skills. Obama we... by Bill Hare on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:33:00 PM
Truman had to fire Mac because Mac was totally scr... by Richard Pietrasz on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:27:47 PM
where you are coming from and I agree with the bas... by Bill Hare on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:05:57 PM