Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (25 comments)

Obama Justice Department defending Rumsfeld on torture

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Rachel Oswald  Posted by Pam Miles (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

In a brief filed Thursday evening, Obama Justice Department lawyers extended many of the same arguments made by Bush attorneys – that top government officials have qualified immunity from prosecution and that Guantanamo detainees do not have constitutional rights to due process.

The Department of Justice has asserted that a Supreme Court ruling reaffirming the rights of Guantanamo detainees to habeas corpus does not apply to plaintiffs in a case against former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld because the plaintiffs were released from prison four years prior to the SCOTUS decision.

"It is fair to say that the current brief that is filed by the new administration supports a lot of the arguments that were made by the previous administration," said Kate Toomey, an attorney with Baach Robinson & Lewis who is representing the former detainees in an interview with RAW STORY. "They continue to assert that torture was in the scope of employment and could be reasonably expected. They continue to assert that these [top officials] be entitled to immunity. They also continue to argue that detainees at Guantanamo don't have constitutional rights."

Read the rest at RawStory.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Change? What Change? by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:00:48 AM
It would appear, by sommers on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:16:27 PM
I agree... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:50:56 PM
The real preblem facing us by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:17:42 PM
No Excuse by John S. Hatch on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:47:11 PM
How do you like your "change" so far? by Mr M on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:48:20 PM
Political drawing by Donna Vogelpohl on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:54:32 PM
To reflect this article more accurately by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:22:52 PM
NOT Change we can believe in! by Annabel Hoyt on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:50:20 PM
That is not what this brief says by Steven Leser on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:27:58 PM
Once again, you missed the lpoint by Jack Harrington on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:49:26 PM
Please Allow a Statement to Form a Question by Jason Paz on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:51:12 PM
Actually, by richard on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:53:54 PM
What are trying for? The Golden Knee Pads? by Mr M on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:03:22 PM
Here's what we do know by Patrick Lafferty on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:35:29 PM
Bush-Obama Administration by Bill Samuel on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:30:50 PM
Obama Deception by Edward Safranski on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:03:24 PM
Obamarama lama ding dongs... by William Whitten on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:54:52 PM
comparing parts to whole by karmacounselor on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:11:26 PM
"mini parts"? We're looking at major crimes against humanity by Mr M on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:58:06 PM
I happen to agree with this scenario by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:24:39 PM
whut? by William Whitten on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:30:46 PM
rumsfeld!s prosecution by robert braunstein on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:36:37 PM
Just asking... by boomerang on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:09:18 PM
Responding to Karmacounselor by Oh on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:19:33 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum