![]() |
1
1
View Ratings |
Rate It
By Sherwood Ross (about the author) Page 1 of 1 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Sherwood Ross - Writer July 3, 2009(Special)---President Obama has no legal "President Obama's surge of 21,000 troops now engaged in "The Obama Administration simply ignored Section 4(a)(3) of "Clearly," Boyle added, "President (George W.) Bush never President Obama "has now escalated the conflict into The U.S. invaded Afghanistan in the The easiest way to do that, he said, In his new book, "Tackling America's
authority either from the United Nations or the U.S. Congress under the War
Powers Resolution(WPR) to escalate the war in Afghanistan, a distinguished
professor of international law says.
combat in Afghanistan comes on top of the 60,000 we already had there," says
Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois
College of Law at Champaign.
the WPR when it announced the escalation," Boyle noted. "U.S. armed forces are
in Afghanistan originally pursuant to WPR. Its requirement that the President
get Congressional consent on substantial enlargement (of forces) was put there
to deal with the kind of gradual escalation we saw in Viet Nam that eventually
led to 550,000 troops being there," Boyle said.
had authority from Security Council in the first place to invade Afghanistan,
and the WPR requires that any enlargement of U.S. troops in a foreign nation be
authorized by Congress." Boyle made his comments in a telephone interview with
columnist Sherwood Ross of Miami, Fla.
Pakistan and has set off a humanitarian catastrophe for 2-million of its people
similar to what President Nixon set off in Cambodia," Boyle said. "What Obama
is doing is destabilizing Pakistan and setting off a civil war there. It's a
very dangerous, illegal, unconstitutional policy," Boyle said.
first place because the Taliban government refused to allow UNOCAL oil to build
the TAPI pipeline across its territory, Boyle said. He noted the route U.S.
troops are taking in Afghanistan is that of the proposed pipeline. "I think
this (escalation) is about getting the oil and gas out of Central Asia by
avoiding Russia and without dealing with Iran," Boyle added.
is to construct pipelines south through Afghanistan, into Pakistan and then out
to the Arabian Sea. The oil and natural gas resources of Central Asia, Boyle
noted, are reported to be the second largest in the world after the Persian
Gulf.
Toughest Questions,"(Clarity) Boyle wrote, "What is going on now in Afghanistan
is not self-defense. Let's be honest. We all know it. At best this is reprisal,
retaliation, vengeance, catharsis. Call it what you want, but it is not
self-defense. And retaliation is never self-defense."
#
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 4 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |