Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 4 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Forfeits Peace Prize - 'Outgunning Bush Not Peacemaking'

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 6/21/11

Become a Fan
  (30 fans)
- Advertisement -

Up, up and away by

Stuck between shame and chagrin, the Swedish Nobel Peace Prize Committee has for the first time in human history reversed a past Peace Prize selection.  With high drama this week, the Committee notified President Obama his misguided 2009 Prize has been formally rescinded, requesting the $1.4 million payoff be returned.  

"It's not about the money," conceded a press release, "we have a sacred obligation to protect the honor of humanitarian-arms maker Alfred Nobel.   Plus, there's the reputation of incendiary peacemakers like Henry Kissinger we need to steadfastly preserve.   Sadly, we are forced to conclude that since his '09 award ceremony Obama has definitively qualified as the world's greatest, pre-emptive warmonger.   Frankly, outgunning Bush, with three new discretionary wars, fails to satisfy our notion of peacemaking.   Never before has any winner -- after the fact and in only two years -- actually doubled his war production.   It's a record we profoundly hope never to be duplicated, forcing this singular withdrawal."  

Apparently, killing civilians with unmanned predatory drones in Pakistan, Yemen, and Libya pushed the Committee over the line.   "Unlike Obama or Bush, we Swedes admit blunders," explained Bjorn Bjorn, "Obama's soaring rhetoric must have come with magic dust because we, too, got enthralled by promises of new world co-operation.   What were we thinking?   Instead of ending warfare and violence, Obama began to notch his Bush-warrior credibility in Afghanistan.   We regret that our Prize may well have provided cover for new assaults and invasions.   The only good news is the 'world's self-appointed police force' hasn't yet struck Iran or North Korea."

Periodically, the Nobel Committee selections have invited strong reaction, Bjorn continued, "like selecting hard-line, Vietnam cold warrior Henry Kissinger, but never before have we honored a leader entranced with unilateral, pre-emptive civilian bombings.   What's the credo here, "All we are saying is give war a chance"?  

A King but No Peaceable Kingdom

In short, the Committee apologized to the world for one of history's most premature, if not ironic awards, initially praising Obama for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."   Bjorn added, "This leader can't reconcile his own citizens on the time of day, let alone boast one diplomatic victory, even a call for truce.   We are astonished by the magnitude of America's belligerence and its utter futility -- squandering soldiers, civilians and $3 trillion to manager one backwater PR win -- assassinating bin Laden."

The historic ironies to this turnabout are rife, as the Nobel Prize was funded by one Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite hugely enriched, in one contemporary phrase, "by finding ways to kill more people faster than ever."   Shocked by fears of a legacy of disgrace, a guilty "merchant of death" endowed the most prestigious peace, literature and science awards.   

- Advertisement -

The prize reversal comes as even a greater shock than the enormous initial surprise, to which the very recipient himself declared surprised. "Heck, I just got here," a senior staffer heard him say at the time, "and I get kudos for devising good campaign rhetoric and not being Bush or McCain.     There's still that 'dumb' Iraq war to end, then Afghanistan to restart, and the Pentagon's all over me with new offers."

Oslo insiders indicated the timing was directly related to upcoming summer White House projections of disappointedly small troop reduction from Iraq and Afghanistan this summer.   The timing also overlaps outrage last week by U.S. House members, claiming Libya violates the War Powers Act that demands Congressional approval after 60 days.  

The stunning reversal drove pundits at home to reconsider remarks made at the time, as from then RNC chair, Michael Steele:  "The real question Americans are asking is, 'What has President Obama actually accomplished?'"  Fifteen months later, millions of disaffected Obama supporters are asking exactly that, dismayed by only marking new wars abroad and compromised legislation at home.

Waiting for Godot the Peacemaker

Notable by their absence are comments from top Prize winners, like Al Gore, once claiming Mr. Obama's recognition was "well deserved," nor from Jimmy Carter, '02 winner who in '09 lauded the Committee for its "bold statement of international support for his vision and commitment."   Unlike Obama, these politicians started no new wars since their selection, with or without Congressional approval.

- Advertisement -

Immediately, John McCain sounded off, as the permanent, global cheerleader for war, "For God's sake, can't those socialist Swedes make up their mind?   Geesh, that half-assed, fake-peace candidate deserves to lose that Peace prize, as the only big thing he ever won was stopping this war hero from taking my rightful place at the top.   Thank God, Iraq is no longer a war 'dumb,' and President Obama snaps to when the Pentagon leads.   The more war, the merrier, like I've always said, 'bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.' And it's never too late," McCain walked off chuckling, smugly confident he's never been in running for the Peace Prize.  


What's in a Prize Name?

Next Page  1  |  2


Northern California, region. For a decade, Robert S. Becker's rebel-rousing essays on politics and culture analyze overall trends, messaging and frameworks, now featured author at OpEdNews, Nation of Change and RSN. He appears regularly at (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What is this, "Give war a chance" and see how it w... by Robert S. Becker on Tuesday, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:43:55 PM