Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 3 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Campaign Displays Democratic Dysfunction and Warnings of Future Betrayal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Valuable 4   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 10/22/12

Become a Fan
  (69 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on October 22, 2012 at 13:39)

By Dave Lindorff


Much ado about nothing in this campaign by ThisCantBeHappening

We know that there isn't much "Hope" for "Change" -- at least for progressive change -- should President Obama win a second term as president.

Even when he had the chance, with Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress during the first two years of his presidency, and with a solid mandate from the voters to act on restoring civil liberties, taking significant action against climate change, ending the wars and defending Social Security and Medicare, he did nothing.

There are some Democrats still caught up in the fantasy, imagining that if the president is re-elected, and doesn't have another term to worry about, he will finally show his "real colors" and become the progressive they imagined him to be in 2008.

The evidence that this is not the case, though, is clear in the way he is campaigning. You don't hear, and did not hear in either of the first two presidential debates, any call for voters to give the president a strong Democratic majority in House and Senate. In fact, there was not a word in either of those debates from the president about the importance of getting rid of the Republican control of the House, and of solidifying the Democratic grip on the Senate to prevent Republicans from again blocking any progressive legislation.

If the president really planned on being a progressive, he would have taken the many opportunities handed to him by Romney in those debates, and by questions from the moderator and the audience in the second debate, to blame Republicans in Congress for the failures of his first term, and would have told the 65-70 million viewers to get out there and elect Democrats to Congress -- especially progressive Democrats. He had a chance to single out the Democrats in tough races where a win would really have shifted the balance not just to the Democrats, but to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, for example Elizabeth Warren over Scott Brown in Massachusetts, or Tammy Baldwin over Tommy Thompson in Wisconsin, or Alan Grayson over Todd Long in Florida.

- Advertisement -

Instead, the president was silent about the congressional races.

 
What this tells us is two things. One, the president and his staff don't really care about Congress, and in fact think that the way to win the White House for a second time is to back away from progressive positions as much as possible, in order to win those so-called "middle of the road" voters who, for the most part, are swayed by weird, meaningless things like appearance, demeanor, and image. And two, the president and his handlers probably don't even want to have a progressive, or even a Democratic majority in Congress, because if they had such a thing, then the president would be compelled to do progressive things in his second term, and he doesn't really want to do that.

This is a president who is happier coddling corporations, massaging the military-industrial complex, and ignoring the indigent. That's easy to do when you have a Republican Congress. You can pretend to be a nice progressive guy trying to do the right thing, only to be stymied by the troglodytes in Congress. But if you helped elect those trogs by not fighting for a Democratic majority, it's really not honest to then blame Congress.

The blame has to be with Obama and his campaign. Instead of making this campaign a movement for real progressive change, it has been a single-minded struggle to re-elect the president -- a president who has little to show for his first four years in office, and who is asking for four more years in which he will deliver little more, except for perhaps more military actions, more assaults on the Bill of Rights, and more undermining of the nation's already shredded social safety net.

I'm not saying things wouldn't be worst under a President Romney -- especially a Romney gifted with a Republican Congress, or a Congress with a Republican House and a Senate with a depleted and further demoralized Democratic majority. But at least with Romney as president, ordinary Americans would quickly be able to identify where the enemy was. With an Obama back in the White House, confusion would continue to reign as the assaults on the New Deal and the Constitution continue, and as the imperialist wars go on, and as the despoilation of the earth continues apace.

- Advertisement -

DAVE LINDORFF is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper. His work, and that of colleagues JOHN GRANT, LORI SPENCER, LINN WASHINGTON, JR. and CHARLES M. YOUNG, can be found atwww.thiscantbehappening.net

 

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!

What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Sen. Bernie Sanders has warned that the bipartisan... by John Andrews on Monday, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:46:54 PM
It is all over.  ... by Lester Shepherd on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:33:09 AM
What's new? Besides his compromised and unwieldy h... by Daniel Vasey on Monday, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:27:09 PM
In this poll,    If Obama Wins a Second ... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:07:28 AM
If I were President, I'd immediately use the NDAA ... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:08:38 AM
Romney would show his true colors, however, Americ... by Lester Shepherd on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:31:40 AM
It is already understood by most thinking American... by kappie on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:15:19 AM
given the vulnerability of the tallying computers ... by Laura Stein on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:07:41 AM
Why not?  Vote Obama in and get senseless war... by Robert James on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:14:17 PM
could it be the ONLY big difference between Romney... by crispy on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:13:51 PM
Didn't Kagan & Breyer vote with the SCOTUS con... by Kristine Hoggatt on Wednesday, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:14:42 AM