Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama 2013: How low can you go?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 5   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/1/14

Become a Fan
  (97 fans)
Source: RT


US President Barack Obama.
(image by (AFP Photo / Nicholas Kamm))


No doubt 2013 will go down as Barack Obama's annus horribilis. The President of the United States (POTUS) currently faces a 55 percent disapproval rating on "the way he is handling his job," according to the latest Washington Post-ABC poll.

Not exactly a train wreck, considering POTUS has been presiding over the unforgiving destruction of the American middle class, with a whopping 76 percent of working Americans living paycheck-to-paycheck. Moreover, in his year-end press conference, POTUS still insisted his administration has struck the right balance between spying and privacy, although admitting, "there may be other ways of skinning the cat."

In foreign policy, "other ways of skinning the cat" has been largely interpreted by frightened US puppets -- of the House of Saud kind -- as the hyperpower dangerously receding. Not really; the strategy of team POTUS is rather an attempt at re-jigging the game while trying to stay in the lead.

If it looks awkward, that's because it is; after all, for the past decades, US foreign policy moves almost always contribute to crystallize non-stop instability in the fault lines. So no wonder 2013 has been a succession of spectacular new lows, although culminating with a possible new high.

Lockdown or else

This February, in his State of the Union address, Obama promised to "help" Libya, Yemen and Somalia, not to mention Mali; failure on all fronts. He promised to "engage" Russia (in fact Russia ended up engaging him). He promised to seduce Asia with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a collection of ultra-dodgy corporate-friendly free-trade scams (Asia was not seduced). He promised to "stand" with those who want freedom in the Middle East (that does not include people from Bahrain).

As this was Capitol Hill, Obama had to recite the Hail Mary; "preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons"; putting more "pressure" on Syria -- whose "regime kills its own people"; and remaining "steadfast" with Israel.

Then came the Boston bombing, whose chief consequence was a monster dry run for urban martial law -- euphemized as "lockdown" -- in a very near American future. As total militarization of civilian life goes -- featuring Homeland Security running amok with hundreds of armored vehicles -- this beat any Hollywood blockbuster.

The intersection of Baltimore Parkway and Maryland Route 32 also danced with the stars; that business park a mile away from the NSA, known as the largest concentration of cyber power on the planet, all about the gung-ho privatization of spying -- call it "Digital Blackwater" -- was at the heart of the Snowden scandal.

Piling up on Obama's infamous kill lists, the Snowden leaks revealed details of how the NSA black hole lords over all as the ultimate Panopticon. And how PRISM -- as expressed in its Dark Side of the Moon-ish logo -- is no less than a graphic expression of the ultimate Pentagon/neo-con wet dream; the Full Spectrum Dominance doctrine. After all the NSA -- also known as No Such Agency -- is part of the Pentagon.


Investigators in white jumpsuits work the crime scene on Boylston Street following yesterday's bomb attack at the Boston Marathon April 16, 2013 in Boston.
(image by (AFP Photo / Darren McCollester))


The Obama administration could not possibly dismiss Full Spectrum Dominance, which was conceptualized way back in the Pentagon's 2002 Joint Vision 2020. And Snowden did not expose anything that was not already known -- or at least suspected -- since 2002.

So Obama and the US government had nothing to spin, except that PRISM is benign; PRISM is legal; it only targets non-US citizens outside of the US; and well, it "may" sweep US citizens' digital information. That's also legal but we can't tell you how.

Snowden made Obama look like a clown, surfing the PR tsunami as a master -- and controlling it all the way (yes, you do learn a thing or two at the CIA). The timing of his disclosure was a beauty; it handed China the ultimate gift just as Obama was harassing President Xi Jinping about cyber war at a California summit.

Humiliation by a private contractor was followed with severe rhetorical spanking by the Russian President. At the G8 summit in Northern Ireland, Putin went for the jugular, addressing Obama face to face:

"Your country sent its army to Afghanistan in the year 2001 on the excuse that you are fighting the Taliban and the Al-Qaeda organization and other fundamentalist terrorists whom your government accused of carrying out the 11 September attacks on New York and Washington. And here you are today making an alliance with them in Syria. And you and your allies are declaring your desire to send them weapons. And here you have Qatar in which you [the US] have your biggest base in the region and in the territory of that country the Taliban are opening a representative office."

That was just a prelude for the real action. POTUS screamed and shouted because he wanted his spy back. Snowden, following Russian laws, was granted temporary asylum. The White House was "disappointed." And a sullen POTUS snubbed the bilateral summit with Putin in Moscow coinciding with the G-20 in St Petersburg. The Kremlin was equally "disappointed."

POTUS by now was morphing from "Yes, We Can" to "Yes, We Scan" and finally "Yes, We Scorn." This might have frightened assorted poodles of the Euroland kind, but it didn't stick to Vlad the Hammer, who quickly evaluated how the Obama administration turned its already shaky "credibility" to ashes on two simultaneous fronts; because of the scale of the Orwellian/Panopticon complex detailed by Snowden's leaks, and because of the way he was being mercilessly hunted.

Feel free to bask in my credibility

Then POTUS outdid himself, creating a -- what else -- "credibility" problem when, recklessly, he pronounced the use of chemical weapons in Syria a "red line."

So the US government urgently needed to punish the transgressor -- to hell with evidence -- to maintain its "credibility." But this time it would be "limited." "Tailored." Only "a few days." A "shot across the bow" -- as POTUS qualified it. Still, some -- but not all -- "high-value targets," including command and control facilities and delivery systems in Syria would have to welcome a barrage of 384 Tomahawk cruise missiles already positioned in the eastern Mediterranean. I called it, at the time, Operation Tomahawk With Cheese.

So in the week marking the 12th anniversary of 9/11, POTUS was fighting for his bombing ''credibility,''  trying to seduce Republican hawks in the US Congress while most of the warmongers du jour happened to be Democrats.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times. His regular column, "The Roving Eye," is widely read. He is an analyst for the online news channel Real News, the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

It was Putin's missile?

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Where is Prince Bandar?

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

Welcome to the Kurdish Spring

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If, indeed, the Obama Administration is really goi... by mhenriday on Thursday, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:35:57 AM
The LimbObama Stick has no bottom.He has 3 more y... by 911TRUTH on Thursday, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:25:20 AM
I think Iran is still in the zionazis' sights. ... by George W.Reichel on Thursday, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:19:20 PM