Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

OIL COMPANY PRICE INCREASES: FACT OR FICTION

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 4/15/11

- Advertisement -

Why do oil producing companies raise gasoline prices when crude oil prices increase?  The answer seems self evident.  Higher raw material cost should justify increases in finished product prices.  However, the oil companies make enormous additional profits during times of price increases for crude oil.  By comparison, if the price of agricultural commodities go up, neither the food processing companies nor the retailers experience such enormous increases in profits.  The explanation lies in the differences in the distribution chain of these two industries as well as sleight of hand creative accounting and tax planning.

OIL PROFITS by SHELDON DROBNY

The food industry chain of distribution starts with the farmer who then sells to the food processing company who then sells their products to distributors and retailers.  In that distribution chain, each level of the distribution chain is owned by separate companies.  The farmers including corporate farmers sell to the food processors like Heinz and Kraft who pass on any increases from the farmer to the distributors and retailers.  The idea is to maintain a consistent gross profit percentage.  Additional profits generally come from sales increases and do not come from price increases.   

The oil companies on the other hand own the entire distribution chain.  They drill and extract the oil and transfer the crude oil to their refineries who then take their finished products of refined oil and gasoline and then sell it to distributors and retailers most of which are also owned by the same oil companies.  When the price of crude oil goes up, the oil companies do not have any real increases in their cost of extracting the oil.  Therefore, their cost of production does not increase with increased prices.  Accordingly, the entire increase in crude oil prices goes directly to their bottom line.  Why then do these companies claim that they are just passing on the extra cost to their retail prices?  Here is where the creative accounting and foreign tax loopholes come into play.

Even though the oil companies own their own refineries, they charge a transfer price to the refineries based upon the market price of crude oil.  The refineries process the crude into refined oil and gasoline at the artificially elevated prices.  The refineries then sell this high priced product to the distributors and retail gas stations whose owners are either the independent retailer or the stations owned by the oil companies.  The gas stations then mark up the cost by 10-15 cents per gallon. 

Therefore, the oil companies charge their own companies the increased price of crude oil and that is how they justify increasing the prices of their finished product yet their cost of producing the oil has not changed.  For example:  Exxon-Mobil has a relatively fixed cost of drilling and extracting oil.  Assuming their cost of extraction is $30/barrel. Every increase in oil prices increase their bottom line dollar for dollar. The current price of crude oil is about $110/barrel. In addition to the additional price they receive for crude oil, they add on a fictitious cost increase to retail gasoline when they have not really had increased costs. In fact they have experienced windfall profits at the crude oil level and falsely justified increases in retail prices as well.  So they reap additional profits from the increase in crude oil prices as well as the artificial increase in retail gas prices.  They do this through the magic of transfer pricing to themselves and they get to avoid taxes as well.

Remember, the oil companies own the entire chain of distribution from extraction to retail sales.  However, the drilling and extraction process is done by a company which is usually located in a foreign country.  That company then sells its crude oil that cost $30/barrel for $110/barrel to another controlled company which then refines the oil.  The refinery adds its refinery cost to the already inflated $110 crude oil price and then transfers that price to the retailer who then adds another level of profit.  However, the end product has not been sold to anyone outside the company yet.  If one collapses this entire facade, the oil company's cost per barrel is still $30 and once the product is sold to the public, the price they are selling the oil and gasoline has been marked up to $110+refining costs+retail markup.  Assuming the total of all the internal markups is $150, the oil company has a profit per barrel of $150 less their cost of production, refining, and distribution. 

- Advertisement -

A careful analysis clearly shows that increases in the price of crude oil does not increase any costs of production and only creates windfall profits.  All of this is lost in the internal accounting and artificial transfer pricing.  In addition to all of that chicanery, most of the profits that the oil companies make are from the transfer pricing to the refineries.  The profit on these sales is usually nested in a foreign corporation and is not taxed until it is repatriated to a U.S. company.  It is unlikely that these windfall profits will ever be repatriated and will probably escape U.S. taxes permanently.  That is why many of the oil companies pay no U.S taxes and it is absolutely legal.

The last phase of this scandal is when Wall Street packages securities based upon the future price of crude oil.   Agricultural commodity futures are securitized by option writers who generally work in the banking industry.   Option writers pay the farmer an option premium to fix the price of their crops.   These options are then traded on various exchanges and are generally bought by speculators or companies who want to hedge the price of their food costs such as food processors.   These agricultural futures go up in price when there is a real shortage created by environmental circumstances such as weather or crop failures.  

Crude oil futures are written by the same financial people and the premium is paid to the oil companies.   The oil company receives additional profit from these option premiums as well as the fixed price they have contracted.   Despite the unrest in the Middle East, there is no shortage of supply for gas and oil.   In addition, unlike agricultural futures, institutional investors such as pension funds are now investing with hedge funds that trade oil futures.   These investments like the sub-prime mortgage securities are highly speculative and subject to a fall in prices if there are not enough new investors to keep this Ponzi scheme going.   The investors are solicited by bankers who in conjunction with the oil companies create artificially increased futures prices.  

As a result, these oil companies are fixing the price of oil by manipulating the futures market which is a disaster for our economy.   Oil companies are ruining the environment as well as the economy and it is incumbent upon governments to intervene with the existing anti-trust laws that have never been used against them.   The problem is that the Justice Department and Congress do not understand the economics of oil and the "shell game" that I previously explained.   Hopefully that will be the first step to solving the problem.

- Advertisement -

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Need Congress To Act

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.paradigmventure.com

Sheldon Drobny was the co-founder of Nova M radio and Air America Radio. He has supported many philanthropic causes. Mr. Drobny specializes in business and tax matters and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Tax Court as a non-attorney. Less (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

OIL COMPANY PRICE INCREASES: FACT OR FICTION

Eisenhower "I Shall Go To Korea " Speech

Saving the Wealthy Class from Itself

"In God We Trust": The Worship Of Money

What's Happening To Obama?

McBush Is Stupid Or Lying About Offshore Drilling

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

After reading this article, please send to your Se... by Sheldon Drobny on Friday, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:45:13 AM
Independent refiners, while not a part of one of t... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:56:25 AM