Tags for This Article:

Right Wing Hypocrisy (304)  Media Hypocrisy (292)  Reality (260)  Books (134)  Pulp Patriotism GOP (130)  Newsweek (112)  Bill OReilly (109)  Patriotism (107)  False Balance (3) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 25, 2008 at 07:43:56

Well Said 1   Funny 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

O'Reilly: "A Big Steaming Lump of Male Vanity"

by JC Garrett     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

Is there any way Bill O'Reilly could have possibly chosen a worse title for his new book, A Bold, Fresh Piece of Humanity? How can anyone miss the obvious comical ridiculousness of that title? Keith Olbermann has alternated between several titles which O'Reilly may as well have chosen, including:

  • A Big Steaming Lump of Male Vanity
  • A Deep Barking Voice of Inanity
  • A Large Bag of Gas Who's No Hannity

    Those three alternate titles were first proposed in June by Newsweek. Bill Orally didn't take too kindly to that, and he railed against Newsweek's editor, Jon Meacham, bloviating blusterously that "NEWSWEEK has really gone off the rails with its far-left posture. For destroying a once fine magazine, Meacham is a pinhead."

    Authors Joseph Minton Amann and Tom Breuer, co-founders of SweetJesusIHateBillOReilly.com, and who wrote a book by the same name, offer these suggestions:

  • Please Dad, Not in the Face: Memories of My Father
  • I've Written Another Book Because My Fans Are Retards
  • Untitled Piece of Shit Bill O'Reilly Manuscript

    Commenters at QRZ Forums have a few good ones:

  • How To Talk Loudly And Influence Sheeple
  • Superiority Through Arrogant Presumption
  • How to Get Idiots to Spend Money

    My favorites: A Big Steaming Lump of Male Vanity, and God forgive me, Please Dad, Not in the Face: Memories of My Father.

    O'Reilly says he decided on this title because a nun once told him as a young boy, "William, you are a bold fresh piece of humanity."

    While I have not read the book (due primarily to my aversion to spending $26 for 256 pages of completely useless B.S.), it's probably safe to assume the rest of the book is every bit as bad as the title, and chock-full of self-congratulatory sentiments that O'Reilly is known for.

    The first page is the Pledge of Allegiance. Nothing wrong with the pledge, but what possible reason would O'Reilly have for making it the first page in his book? It's amazing that even Stephen Colbert's exaggerated pretend wrapping of himself in the flag can't come close to the reality of Bill O'Reilly's false patriotism.

    If you are considering purchasing A Bold, Fresh Piece, be forewarned that there may be unintended consequences that may weigh heavily on your conscience. O'Reilly's website states:

    For a limited time, for every copy of A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity bought on BillOReilly.com, we will send a copy to the troops.

    Haven't the troops been through enough hardship and pain?

    I also have it on good authority from unnamed sources that Cheney has now implemented the inclusion of the forced reading of all of O'Reilly's books in the list of approved enhanced interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay and secret CIA prisons.

    One other humorous piece of trivia is that the letters of Billo's newest title can be rearranged to form the anagram "Shameful, bona fide hypocrite."

    By JC Garrett

     

    JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office. "I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American." Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music. His stories have appeared in Political Affairs Magazine, ACLU FreedomWire, Online Journal, Infowars, Prison Planet, OpEd News, Consortium News, The Intelligence Daily, Democratic Underground, Truthdig, The Memory Hole, Wired, World Prout Assembly, and local publications.

     

    Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

    NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    3 comments

    DOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.
    rhalfhillDOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.

    THERE SHALL BE NO ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION

    There IS something wrong with the pledge.  During the 1950's, at the height of the anti communist witch hunt, "under God" was added to the pledge to distinguish ourselves from the "Godless communists."  "An Atheistic American is a contradiction in terms" someone said.

    This addition to the pledge flies in the face of the Constitutional provision that "there shall be no establishment of religion" as well as the additional Constitutional provision that "there shall be no religious test" for any office under the United States.

    Many Christian ministers argued that there should be something recognizing Christianity in the Constitution but the founders rejected their proposal, opting instead for a government that let people believed what they want while using its police powers to keep the adherents of the different religions from killing each other.  Adding "under God" to the pledge is as contrary to the Constitution as it would be to add "under Allah" or Atheists such as myself to add "under no God."  All additions violate freedom of religion.

    Robert Halfhill

    by rhalfhill (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 310 comments) on Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 8:04:02 PM
     


    JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

    "I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

    Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

    His stories have ...

    to see more of bio, click on member name

    JC GarrettJC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

    "I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

    Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

    His stories have ...

    to see more of bio, click on member name

    Apples and Oranges

    The Pledge and the Constitution are two entirely different things.

    The biggest difference is that the Pledge is a wholly voluntary recitation of an affirmation of loyalty to America. It has no weight or effect in law, and is merely traditional custom rather than a foundational legal document like the Constitution.

    If one wishes to take part in the Pledge (or not), it is completely dependent on the individual's discretion and preference whether they choose to include "under God."

    In an excellent article here on OEN entitled Saying No to the Pledge, James Mullin writes in detail of the history of the Pledge, and its nationalistic background. Almost anything can be used for evil as well as good. 

    So there is nothing inherently wrong with the Pledge, especially since each person can choose for himself whether to change the wording, or whether to partake in the customary recitation at all.

    by JC Garrett (40 articles, 65 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 604 comments) on Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 8:39:37 PM
     

     

    3 comments

     
    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/maxwrite/database.inc.php on line 48

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/maxwrite/database.inc.php on line 48

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/maxwrite/database.inc.php on line 48

    Tell A Friend

     


    Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008
  • Blog Ads

     

     

     

     

    Most Popular Articles
    in the Last 2 Days
    (by Recommend Emails)

    NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

    Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

    Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

    SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

    No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

    Odetta Sings Her First Song, from Way Up Above Us by muservin

    Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

    Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

    STILL UNANSWERED 9/11 QUESTIONS by Allen L Roland

    Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

    Go To Top 50 Most Popular