Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H4) on 6/9/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (54 comments)

Nothing on Earth Can Save Us

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


June 4th, 2010 may someday be remembered as being the day that the future changed. On this date, the privately built and financed Falcon-9 rocket was launched from Cape Canaveral. Why is event of such great significance?

To understand this we first need to consider where we--human civilization--are at as of mid-2010. Our global political economy is based upon hydrocarbon energy: coal, natural gas, and most especially, oil. Yet oil planetary production has likely peaked. Oil discoveries peaked in the mid-1960's, and discoveries of new oil have declined precipitously since then. Despite use of more sophisticated technology, future production must decline. Current production has been flat for six years now:

There are only a handful of coal exporting countries--principally the U.S., Australia and Russia. The quality of coal being mined now is decreasing. High grade, high energy content anthracite coal seams are being replaced by lower-quality, lower energy and more polluting, bituminous and sub-bituminous coals as anthracite deposits are exhausted. As a consequence of this the net energy produced by coal mining per year may already have peaked. Each succeeding year, less and less net energy will be gained from these inferior, energy-deficient coals, even though the total tons of mined coal will rise for several decades to come.

Natural gas is difficult to transport, creating mostly regional, pipeline based markets. For North America, maintaining current supplies requires use of resource-intensive (particularly water) and environmentally-damaging technologies, principally hydraulic fracturing, or "fraking" as it is commonly referred to. And supplies of this resource will inevitably begin to decline too.

The bottom line is simple: Future growth of the global economy, including maintaining the rapid development of China and India, cannot be sustained. Consequences of hydrocarbon use, principally rapid climate changes as heat builds up in the atmosphere and the oceans, will knock the Earth's climate out of energy balance.

Agriculture is a bet that we understand long-term weather well enough to reliably grow crops. This assumption is violated as the planet slips out of energy balance. Further, each calorie of food grown using "modern" agriculture requires input of about 10 calories of, ever scarcer, ever more expensive, hydrocarbon energy.

Worse yet, the entire global economy consists of debt-based money. Such money only has "value" if future economic growth can be reasonably anticipated to pay it back. Without this assumption the world economy must collapse.

Nothing on Earth, not nuclear, not solar, or wind, or tidal energy can fill the looming energy deficit. We appear to be doomed to civilizational collapse given that nothing on Earth can save us at this late hour.

Nothing on Earth"

That's where the space launch of the Falcon-9 rocket comes in. It was developed using private financing by a startup company, completely unaffiliated with the existing big aerospace sector. Elon Musk, co-founder of Pay Pal, sold his share of that internet company in order to self-finance the start-up of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, or "SpaceX" as it is generally called, with $100 million of his own money back in 2002.[i] Musk's vision was to reduce the cost of access to space by a factor of 10 while simultaneously increasing safety and reliability by a factor of 10. All indications are that he is succeeding brilliantly.

SpaceX's smaller cargo rocket, the Falcon-1, was successfully test launched into orbit on July 14th, 2009. Now SpaceX has a $1.6 billion contract from NASA to resupply the International Space Station beginning next year, following the retirement of the space shuttles. This resupply will be accomplished by means of the Dragon reusable spacecraft. This was launched as a prototype, atop the Falcon-9 rocket on June 4th, 2010. The Dragon payload capsule can also be configured to carry a crew of up to 7 astronauts to and from the International Space Station. It is anticipated that the Obama Administration will award SpaceX with a contract to transport US astronauts to and from the Space Station beginning in about 2012/2013.

How does this relate to our looming earthbound catastrophe? Consider that solar and wind energy is diffuse and also intermittent. Additionally, there is no effective way to store large amounts of energy indefinitely until it is needed. Batteries are inefficient and energy and resource intensive to fabricate anyway; pumping water uphill to be used to turn generators loses much of the original energy, etc. Finally, there is no existing way to move electricity around the world. There are only regional grids.

Back in the 1980's a study conducted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) found that power could be easily beamed, safely and efficiently from space in the form of microwaves. Power sent from a satellite in geosynchronous orbit can be beamed as microwaves to Earth with about 85% efficiency.[ii] What the study envisioned was actually collecting the power in space and sending it to a receiving station on the ground. This is pretty complex--although a California company founded in 2001, Solaren Corporation[iii], has signed a contract with California utility PG&E to do just that starting in 2016.[iv]

However, a simpler task would be to deploy a series of microwave reflectors to encircle the Earth in geosynchronous orbits. A single reflector could be deployed from a single Falcon-9 heavy lift rocket, which is able to hoist about 43,000 pounds of anything into that orbit. The reflector would be gossamer thin and would fold out from the payload shroud. Because it only needs to be reflective to microwaves--wire mesh basically--it could be invisible to the human eye by the way. Station keeping could be maintained essentially forever using an ion technology; such engines have already been developed and deployed for commercial satellite station keeping.[v] Even more efficient ion engines will soon be attached to the Space Station to maintain its altitude against orbital decay.[vi] These will then become available for space based power generation station keeping purposes. Ad Astra Rocket Company, founded in 2006 by astronaut Franklin Chang Diaz (who flew a record seven space shuttle missions), is actively developing this technology under contract from NASA.

I believe that solar, wind, tidal, hydro and geothermal energy can be captured wherever they are, fed into a local grid, and then relayed to another destination through an orbiting microwave reflector. The net efficiency of energy transmission from source to destination would be .85 (up to orbit) times .85 (down to Earth), or 72.25 percent efficiency. This wireless global power transmission grid would be accomplished without new power lines.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.MichaelPByron.com

Michael P Byron is the author of The Path Through Infinity's Rainbow: Your Guide to Personal Survival and Spiritual Transformation in a World Gone Mad. This book is a manual for taking effective action to deal with the crises of our age including (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
54 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Call for action. by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:22:39 PM
this article raises so many questions and red flags - by peggyn on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:55:22 PM
scam, eh? by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:00:34 PM
Reply by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:05:03 PM
no reaction to your finding my reference to that noble quote by peggyn on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:47:33 PM
Who missed what point? by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:54:38 PM
You write: by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:51:22 PM
never ass*u*me by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:02:10 PM
A Little Bit Optimistic... by Paul from Potomac on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:02:39 PM
Did you follow the relevant footnote for SpaceX by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:39:42 PM
What happens when you burn ammonia? by Josh Mitteldorf on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:43:34 AM
Products of ammonia combustion by Paul from Potomac on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:53:03 AM
$40,00/KG?? by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:11:43 AM
The Real Cost by Paul from Potomac on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:19:37 AM
Not necessarily. by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:09:08 AM
Good Try by Paul from Potomac on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:57:41 AM
Ad Astra Rocket Company by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:36:01 AM
Addendum by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:10:21 PM
Please stop by Paul from Potomac on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:41:48 PM
Hmm... by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:54:19 PM
Correction - I had the wrong reference by Paul from Potomac on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:45:10 PM
OK by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:01:43 PM
math by Dr. Michael P Byron on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:29:39 PM
GLloyd RAISES AN INTERESTING QUESTION by WML on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:35:47 PM
It depends. by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:45:05 PM
Yes, I checked your sources by Paul from Potomac on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:16:36 PM
Question, Paul: by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:44:23 PM
Who's on point for OTEC? by Paul from Potomac on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:04:07 AM
We will see by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:20:29 PM
My two bits by JohnPeebles on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:38:02 PM
Thanks by Dr. Michael P Byron on Wednesday, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:57:50 PM
Rob Kall, by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:02:28 AM
Young?! by Dr. Michael P Byron on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:42:28 AM
How do we avoid the "psychopaths"? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:34:19 AM
Very good question, Carol. by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:32:26 AM
Who's us, and who's them? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:44:01 AM
Wisdom in your words by Paul from Potomac on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:43:33 AM
Put up some articles, Paul. by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:16:25 AM
Why oligarchies? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:17:59 AM
re: Why oligarchies? by Paul from Potomac on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:11 AM
oligarchies vs. utopian dreams v. PUP by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14:05 PM
Answer... by Paul from Potomac on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:35:21 PM
Carol. by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:38:40 PM
The power is on the ground actually. by Dr. Michael P Byron on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:47:37 AM
The Only Solution Is by aberamsay on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:40:41 AM
Is the glass almost empty? No. It's only half full. by Ruth on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:49:09 PM
Yes by Dr. Michael P Byron on Thursday, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:08:24 PM
But We Need This Jumpstart to Save the Earth by Ruth on Saturday, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:20:36 PM
Keep the faith! by Dr. Michael P Byron on Saturday, Jun 12, 2010 at 2:52:40 PM
Free Energy by Bill Cain on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:38:36 PM
My friend the geologist with tons of drilling experience by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:57:17 PM
Scaremongering by Thomas Turk on Saturday, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:35:18 PM
compelling by peggyn on Saturday, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:32:36 PM
Start by Bill Cain on Monday, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:58:08 PM