Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Nothing New in the Latest Atrocity by Americans in Afghanistan

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 3/12/12
Become a Fan
  (16 fans)

opednews.com


By now, we've all heard about the American serviceman who went on a shooting rampage in the middle of the night in Afghanistan killing some 16 Afghan civilians as they slept, most of them women and children.

As usual, President Obama expressed "his condolences to the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives, and to the people of Afghanistan, who have endured too much violence and suffering".

General John Allen, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, who at the time was visiting in the U.S. issued his "profound regret" saying, "This deeply appalling incident in no way represents the values of"coalition troops or the abiding respect we feel for the Afghan people,"(ah, have you checked with the troops lately, General?).

Meanwhile Afghan President Karsai called it "intentional killings" and demanded an explanation by the Americans.

But in contradiction with General Allen's statement, Wali Muhammad, a local Afghan who said 11 of the dead were members of his uncles family, gave the truest account when he said, "Americans have never respected our culture, and we will never be secure while the Americans are here."

Let's face it, most servicemen in our wars of choice (whether in Afghanistan, Iraq and earlier in Viet Nam) don't respect the culture of the country they're fighting in, but most don't go around wantonly killing innocent women and children in their sleep.

It's also true servicemen don't always know who the enemy is when everyday villagers as well as insurgents dress in the same type clothing and speak the same language. So the regular military "grunts" see all the people as the potential enemy and when they lose some of their buddies (which is going to happen in war), they have been known to seek revenge and innocent "locals" may suffer in retaliation. Sometimes these retaliations take the form of massacres, clearly an example of this latest incident.

So who knows the specific reasons that drove this soldier to commit this atrocity? He was obviously deranged at the time of the shooting and in all likelihood, he will be held to account and suffer the consequences of his committing this heinous act. But if it's just seen as some "isolated incident by a deranged soldier, we miss the larger picture of what's really going on in Afghanistan.

Here's my take:

-          From the very beginning, we've put these guys in harms way unnecessarily.

-          We invaded and occupied a Muslim country for suspect and politically contrived reasons.

-          We kept changing and re-inventing the purpose of the mission, (remember it was initially to go after the perpetrators of 9/11, specifically Osama bin Laden and secondarily to unseat the Taliban government that was sheltering him). Although Osama got away at the time, the other mission was completed in weeks. We should have declared victory and left. Instead we focused on Iraq, let the situation in Afghanistan wither with neglect for years then resumed the fight with intensity when Obama was elected. By then the "enemy" had morphed into the reconstituted Taliban replacing the departed bin Laden and his al Qaeda cohorts that mostly departed for the greater opportunities of their sort of mayhem years earlier in Iraq.

-          To the servicemen on the ground who knows what they're thinking. Many of them have been "stop lost" and been forced to serve another tour of duty. Meanwhile we've been in the country over 10 years, we're drawing down troops with the intent of leaving by 2014, but in the meantime we're supposed to be training the Afghans to take over when we leave. But some of the Afghans we've trained are now killing some of their American trainers, (how's that for gratitude).

-            The bottom line is soldiers are trained to kill the enemy. That's what they're good at. They're not diplomats and ambassadors. You want to train them to hate the enemy to justify killing him. It's understandable if there's confusion with the mission and what it is they're supposed to be doing.

-          But our wars are chosen by politicians and contrived for political reasons. They're not necessary and they're not fought to protect and defend the country. That's simply propaganda. We're not in danger of an imminent attack by some imperialist power. Terrorists with box cutters, commandeering commercial airplanes and flying them into two commercial buildings and the Pentagon, doesn't constitute an invasion force that justifies invading and occupying another country or two.

-          Of course the politicians authorizing these wars don't have a direct stake in them. Their children are not drafted and put in harms way. They've got an all volunteer army to do their bidding.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

an independent investigation of 911. Once that has... by intotheabyss on Monday, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:15:07 PM
" and in all likelihood, he will be held to accoun... by Dar Gary on Monday, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:03:30 PM