Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
19 comments

General News

Not Just the Koch Brothers: New Study Reveals Funders Behind the Climate Change Denial Effort

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Funny 2   Interesting 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 1/5/14

opednews.com

A new study conducted by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement. This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort.

Through an analysis of the financial structure of the organizations that constitute the core of the countermovement and their sources of monetary support, Brulle found that, while the largest and most consistent funders behind the countermovement are a number of well-known conservative foundations, the majority of donations are "dark money," or concealed funding.

The data also indicates that Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, two of the largest supporters of climate science denial, have recently pulled back from publicly funding countermovement organizations. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to countermovement organizations through third party pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funders cannot be traced, has risen dramatically.

Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science in Drexel's College of Arts and Sciences, conducted the study during a year-long fellowship at Stanford University's Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences The study was published today in Climatic Change, one of the top 10 climate science journals in the world.

The climate change countermovement is a well-funded and organized effort to undermine public faith in climate science and block action by the U.S. government to regulate emissions. This countermovement involves a large number of organizations, including conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, trade associations and conservative foundations, with strong links to sympathetic media outlets and conservative politicians.


To uncover how the countermovement was built and maintained, Brulle developed a listing of 118 important climate denial organizations in the U.S. He then coded data on philanthropic funding for each organization, combining information from the Foundation Center with financial data submitted by organizations to the Internal Revenue Service. "The climate change countermovement has had a real political and ecological impact on the failure of the world to act on the issue of global warming," said Brulle. "Like a play on Broadway, the countermovement has stars in the spotlight -- often prominent contrarian scientists or conservative politicians -- but behind the stars is an organizational structure of directors, script writers and producers, in the form of conservative foundations. If you want to understand what's driving this movement, you have to look at what's going on behind the scenes."

The final sample for analysis consisted of 140 foundations making 5,299 grants totaling $558 million to 91 organizations from 2003 to 2010. The data shows that these 91 organizations have an annual income of just over $900 million, with an annual average of $64 million in identifiable foundation support. Since the majority of the organizations are multiple focus organizations, not all of this income was devoted to climate change activities, Brulle notes.

Key findings include:

  • Conservative foundations have bank-rolled denial. The largest and most consistent funders of organizations orchestrating climate change denial are a number of well-known conservative foundations, such as the Searle Freedom Trust, the John William Pope Foundation, the Howard  Charitable Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. These foundations promote ultra-free-market ideas in many realms.
  • Koch and ExxonMobil have recently pulled back from publicly visible funding. From 2003 to 2007, the Koch Affiliated Foundations and the ExxonMobil Foundation were heavily involved in funding climate-change denial organizations. But since 2008, they are no longer making publicly traceable contributions.
  • Funding has shifted to pass through untraceable sources. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to denial organizations by the Donors Trust has risen dramatically. Donors Trust is a donor-directed foundation whose funders cannot be traced. This one foundation now provides about 25% of all traceable foundation funding used by organizations engaged in promoting systematic denial of climate change.
  • Most funding for denial efforts is untraceable. Despite extensive data compilation and analyses, only a fraction of the hundreds of millions in contributions to climate change denying organizations can be specifically accounted for from public records. Approximately 75% of the income of these organizations comes from unidentifiable sources.


Climate Change Denialism money
(image by Robert J. Brulle, PhD)

"The real issue here is one of democracy. Without a free flow of accurate information, democratic politics and government accountability become impossible," said Brulle. "Money amplifies certain voices above others and, in effect, gives them a megaphone in the public square. Powerful funders are supporting the campaign to deny scientific findings about global warming and raise public doubts about the roots and remedies of this massive global threat. At the very least, American voters deserve to know who is behind these efforts."


Brulle has authored numerous articles and book chapters on environmental science, and is a frequent media commentator on climate change. He co-edited   Power, Justice and the Environment: A Critical Appraisal of the Environmental Justice Movement   (2005) with David Pellow, and is the author of  Agency, Democracy, and Nature: U.S. Environmental Movements from a Critical Theory Perspective   (2000). This study is part one of a three-part project by Brulle to examine the climate movement in the U.S. at the national level. The next step in the project is to examine the environmental movement or the climate change movement. Brulle will then compare the whole funding flow to the entire range of organizations on both sides of the debate.

Brulle previously served as a commissioned officer in the United States Coast Guard for two decades. He received a doctorate in sociology from George Washington University, a master of science degree in natural resources from the University of Michigan, a master of arts degree in sociology from the New School for Social Research and a bachelor of science degree in marine engineering from the United States Coast Guard Academy.

The full paper is available here.


(image by Robert J. Brulle, PhD)

Reprinted from drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases

 


Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More-- The Indigenous People's Revolution Begins

"March Against Monsanto" Planned for Over 30 Countries

Bernie Sanders Blocks Bernanke Confirmation... With Bi-Partisan Support

Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture

Statement of 911 Widows In Response to 12/25 Terror Attempt

Occupy & Tea Party Join Forces to Protest NDAA

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

see comment below ... by Eric Zuesse on Sunday, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:37:39 PM
[my prior comment, if it's still here, linked to ... by Eric Zuesse on Sunday, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:46:07 PM
The problem with this issue is both sides are stea... by Chris C. on Sunday, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:03:59 PM
Half your comment is from those very anti-warming... by lindsncal on Tuesday, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:06:25 PM
Facts can be used out of context.  The ice p... by Jim Miles on Wednesday, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:47:30 PM
"... the amount of funding given to countermovemen... by Fredrick O'Keefe on Sunday, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:01:15 PM
It's always good for a laugh to see fingers pointe... by Mitchell McAleer on Sunday, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:32:26 PM
Yes, I see that you already have the directions to... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:00:48 AM
As Mac Ford says, "stick with the issues." ... by Jim Miles on Wednesday, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:31:30 PM
As Mac Ford says, "Stick with the issues" ... by Jim Miles on Wednesday, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:30:35 PM
Not the primary drive by any means, but certainly... by Jim Miles on Wednesday, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:51:28 PM
This article by Brulle looks like a last gasp at ... by gravity on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:09:49 AM
IMO, it's time to stop quibbling about the sources... by Sara Cope on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:47:00 PM
The word is getting out that you use as sources th... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:30:09 PM
No Eric and Sara. I use as sources the publicat... by gravity on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:17:47 PM
In trying to decide whether we are in for warmin... by gravity on Monday, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:50:37 PM
Interesting handle you got there "gravity" consid... by Gary Williams on Tuesday, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:55:28 PM
As for that Medievel Warm Period, " Despite subst... by Gary Williams on Tuesday, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:21:36 PM
Gary, Your two references regarding the Medie... by gravity on Wednesday, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:52:54 AM