Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Norquist pledges likely to trigger GOP death knell

By       Message P. A. Triot     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/9/12

- Advertisement -

(Article changed on December 9, 2012 at 20:11)

By P. A. Triot

Grover G. Norquist is an American lobbyist, conservative activist and founder of Americans for Tax Reform.

If his name is not already a household word, it soon will be. He is known as the promoter of the "Taxpayer Protection Pledge," which prior to the November 2012 elections was signed by 95 percent of all Republican members of Congress and all but one of the candidates running for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, to oppose any increases in income tax rates for wealthy individuals and businesses, according to Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.com).

Norquist is the guy who came up with the extremist idea of starving the federal government because he thought it was impossible to get control of higher taxes and runaway spending. His 2012 non-taxation oath was the latest of his ideas to achieve the starvation of the federal government.

George H. W. Bush's presidency was derailed because he had to break his 1988 promise of "no new taxes," Bush's response to Norquist's early push to starve the government.

It's this "no-new-taxes" approach and "Taxpayer Protection Pledge," in the minds of Republican congress members, that seems to trump those same politicians' oaths to "preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States."

That pledge to not raise taxes during a time of war (such as the war in Afghanistan) might understandably be considered by many people as treason. (Ought investigations be pursued in that event?)

- Advertisement -

Even if the political misconduct doesn't rise to the level of treason, Republican diehards who choose to remain loyal to Norquist rather than to the U. S. Constitution are bound to pay a significant price in the form of outrage of their home constituencies' anger and wrath in the 2014 mid-term election.

After all, between 60 percent and 80 percent of the American people want Congress to force rich people and corporations to pay "their fair share" of taxes in this country.

Of course no one knows just what a "fair share" is but we'll find out soon enough, if not in the next month or two then in the next or two years.

In the meantime, Norquist is angry with the handful of Republicans in Congress who have indicated they might reconsider their signing of The Taxpayer Protection Pledge because the nation's economy is in such dire straights. Norquist is apoplectic about that twist catching on; I'm afraid that he's headed for a stroke.

On the other hand, the public is so angry with Republicans obstructing any sort of solution that might portray President Obama as competent that it will engage in a voter riot, not a riot in the traditional sense but a groundswell of rejection of the Republican Party.

- Advertisement -

If we have two more years like the past two years, the public will exact a revenge on the GOP that hasn't been experienced in America for 150 years.

Republicans' continued loyalty to Norquist will be, and ought to be, seen as a betrayal of their oaths of office as congress members.

Rather than preserving and protecting the Constitution of the United States, the GOP would instead be seen as swearing their loyalty to a man who is out to subvert the Constitution, which is, of course, what Norquist is up to.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

P. A. Triot is the pen name of a retired journalist.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Palin a liability; McCain's judgment fails

Neocon ideas, free-trade theory discredited

Examining Palin's qualifications, judgment not sexist

McCain's health an issue; answers demanded

Norquist pledges likely to trigger GOP death knell

McCain picks Sarah Palin; GOP weeps