Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend 1 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

New U.S. Adventurism in the South China Sea

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/13/11

The South China Sea

One would think with the disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S. would rethink some of its more belligerent and unnecessary provocations everywhere in the world.

With the Iraq war finally coming to a close at the end of this month (though leaving an embassy the size of the Vatican with thousands of private contractor mercenaries still there under the State Department aegis) and the Afghan quagmire continuing but advertized by the administration that we'll be out of there by 2014, a new major American policy shift has come about that has essentially flown under the radar and hasn't generated the kind of attention it should have.

It's possible that could happen as the shift was first announced by President Obama a month ago in a speech to the Australian Parliament and domestic concerns were more on the minds of Americans.

But make no mistake; the U.S. is intending to refocus militarily on Asia and specifically to counter China.

Although the president didn't mention China and its enormous economic growth as the reason for bolstering the American military presence in Asia, he did say, "My guidance is clear. As we plan and budget for the future, we will allocate the resources necessary to maintain our strong military presence in this region."

In line with this new focus, the Obama administration is initially establishing a 250 man marine detachment (later to be upped to 2,500) at Darwin on Australia's north coast. It has also adopted something called "The Manila Declaration" that signals closer military ties with the Philippines. It has announced the sale of 24 F-16 fighter jets to Indonesia. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently visited Burma and she has also talked recently about increasing military ties with Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. In a recent article in "Foreign Policy" magazine she spoke of "increased investment"diplomatic, economic, strategic and otherwise"in the Asia Pacific region." And a month earlier, in late October, new Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, at a meeting of Southeast Asia nations in Bali, Indonesia indicated the U.S. presence in the Pacific would continue unabated (despite expected cutbacks in Pentagon spending) saying, "The U.S. would be a force for peace and stability" in the region.

So what exactly does this new U.S. pivot toward Asia and the Pacific and more specifically the South China Sea mean?

It seems ALL China's neighbors bordering the South China Sea i.e. Viet Nam, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines all claim territorial sovereignty over disputed islands adjacent to their country to which China also claims sovereignty.

As one can imagine, these territorial disputes over these islands sovereignty have often times resulted in incidents and violent clashes between the adversaries. Up to now, China and all the countries involved have attempted to resolve these disputes diplomatically (if not always successfully). To be sure China's huge physical presence and economic muscle have been factors of intimidation that have often come into play in these diplomatic encounters to where the neighbors have desired a "counterweight" to act on their behalf (and help fend off its larger neighbor). So they have "possibly" agreed to ask for a greater U.S. naval presence in the South China Sea to help bolster their territorial claims OR as even more likely have acquiesced to U.S. pressure and been forced to accept the stepped up U.S. naval presence and "protection" in the South China Sea.

At the present time, the U.S. has (7) carrier battle groups and (18) nuclear submarines operating in the Pacific; as one Chinese diplomat was heard to say, "All to check North Korea; who really believes that?  

With China becoming an economic colossus a fact, it was inevitable that it would begin to build up its navy to help protect those growing economic interests, much of which travels over the waters of the South China Sea.

Now in steps an increased U.S. naval presence under the ploy of protecting ALL nations' interests and keeping the sea lanes open in the South China Sea.

This has all the makings of a containment policy aimed directly at China (which coincidentally, has not gone unnoticed by them) and the start of a new cold war.

With China's naval buildup a fact and a greater U.S. naval presence about to happen, the chances increase exponentially that accidents (incidents?) in the South China Sea will occur between Chinese and U.S. naval forces, be interpreted as provocative incidents initiated by the other that could eventually (inevitably?) lead to war.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

South China Sea certainly reads like the next stop... by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:30:51 PM
Just as a general note.It was a pre-arranged Exit ... by Maj. William Martin on Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:05:26 PM