![]() |
|
|
October 3, 2008 at 13:12:12
by Michael Richardson Page 1 of 2 page(s) |
|
|
A hush filled the packed chambers of the Nebraska Supreme Court as attorney Robert Bartle played a chilling 50-second tape recording of the emergency call that lured Omaha police officer Larry Minard to his 1970 ambush-bombing death. A man's deep gritty voice could be heard making a report about a woman screaming at a vacant house. The Omaha World-Herald described the killer's voice as "deep and drawling." Attorney Bartle told the justices, "That isn't the voice of a 15-year old. That is not the voice of Duane Peak." Duane Peak was a teenager who confessed to planting the bomb and making the deadly phone call. Peak also implicated Black Panther leaders Ed Poindexter and Mondo we Langa (formerly David Rice) in exchange for his own lenient treatment and became the state's murderous star witness against the two Panthers. However, if Peak did not make the call as he claimed, the case against Poindexter and Langa unravels leaving an unidentified killer on the loose. The scratchy tape, never heard by the jury that convicted the Panther leaders, has a long, troubling history and was kept under wraps by order of J. Edgar Hoover, then-director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Hoover had declared a secret war against the Black Panther Party and other domestic political groups code-named Operation COINTELPRO. The "no holds barred" tactics of COINTELPRO directed at the Panthers had a lethal ferocity with false arrests and convictions as one of the techniques. Hoover's agents had already targeted Poindexter and Langa when the August bombing claimed Minard's life.
The FBI arrived at the crime scene soon after the blast and helped direct the investigation. The Omaha Special-Agent-in-Charge worked directly with Asst. Chief of Police Glen W. Gates who led the murder investigation. While uniformed officers began a massive sweep of Omaha's Near-Northside neighborhood arresting dozens of people and technicians sifted through blast debris looking for clues, Gates met with the FBI and agreed to send the tape recording of the killer's voice to the FBI crime laboratory in Washington, D.C. to identify the caller.
The Omaha World-Herald headline told the public "Voiceprint in Bombing to FBI Lab". A police spokesman told the paper the tape would be a "good investigative tool". But the tape was sent to the FBI lab with unusual instructions to not issue a formal report and instead orally inform the Omaha FBI office of the results of analysis. The COINTELPRO hidden agenda was not to catch the actual killers of Minard but instead make a case against Poindexter and Langa.
When Ivan Willard Conrad, director of the crime lab, got the memo requesting a secret report on the tape he spoke with Hoover by phone two days after the bombing. Before Minard's body was buried, Hoover gave the command to withhold an official report thus limiting the search for the policeman's killer. Conrad scrawled on his copy of the COINTELPRO memo, "Dir advised telephonically & said OK to do" followed by his initials and date.
Conrad followed Hoover's orders and issued no formal findings on the identity of the unknown caller. However, the Omaha Special-Agent-in-Charge sent another COINTELPRO memo to Hoover two months later in October. "Assistant COP GLENN GATES, Omaha PD, advised that he feels any use of this call might be prejudicial to the police murder trial against two accomplices of PEAK and, therefore, has advised that he wishes no use of this tape until after the murder trials of PEAK and the two accomplices have been completed."
The hearing was in the austere chambers of the state high court located in the Nebraska Capitol and was filled with supporters of Poindexter and Langa, many wearing T-shirts indentifying the 'Omaha Two' as political prisoners. Questions from the bench focused on the custody of the tape and who was to blame for withholding the recording from the jury.
Assistant Attorney General James Smith argued everyone knew there was a tape and failure of the defense attorneys to introduce the tape at trial was a tactical decision by lawyers for the two Panthers. Bartle's argument is that the prosecution should have provided the tape to defense attorneys as a part of discovery. Regardless of who was at fault for the jury not getting to hear the killer's voice Bartle said, "The whole point to Poindexter is that he was still deprived of the use of the tape."
Smith countered that Frank Morrison, a former-Nebraska governor and Poindexter's court-appointed lawyer, made a tactical decision and Poindexter had to live with it. However, not long before his death Morrison gave a deposition in 2003 about his role in the case and he admitted making mistakes that led to an unfair trial. Morrison's strongest statement about the matter came earlier in 1997 in the form of a public letter.
"As a citizen and former prosecutor, and Governor of this state, I abhor, detest and condemn the cowardly, cruel, and unjustified murder of officer Minard. My heart aches for his family. The guilty parties should pay the penalty. The self-confessed murderer was turned loose after a slap on the wrist."
"I now believe and always have believed that the true role of law enforcement is truth. Real justice can only be built on truth. I hope the Congress and other policy makers will reestablish this policy. I feel both I and the system failed Ed Poindexter."
In 2006, the tape was subjected to modern voice analysis and vocal expert Tom Owen determined that Peak did not make the emergency call. In 2007, Owen gave testimony in Douglas County District Court that included a detailed phrase-by-phrase courtroom analysis of the fatal call.
No date for a decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court has been set. Poindexter and Langa remain imprisoned at the maximum-security Nebraska State Penitentiary. Duane Peak, the confessed bomber, was freed after 33 months of juvenile detention and lives in the state of Washington a free man. The unknown caller whose deep voice opened the court hearing has never been identified and has not been brought to justice. Larry Minard, the father of five young children, was buried on what would have been his thirtieth birthday.
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
| 5 comments |
|
False Imprisonment
OMG! I can't believe these guys are still in prison. Those that covered up this recording should replace the innocent in prison. They moved fast enought to lock up these two so why can't they move fast enough to get them out. This is so wrong. I have never ever liked Hoover. He was an ugly little man that was evil to the bone. I hope both of them sue the pants off the state and the FBI. Also know as Fu,,,,,BigIdiots!!!! by sandy valencour (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 38 comments [11 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:30:38 PM
|
|
Michael, don't tell me that you are now questioning the
American justice system! I could have sworn that your opinion was that they never did anything questionable. I'm glad to see that you woke up to the truth and are trying to inform the public about it. Oh, by the way, withholding evidence like this is supposed to result in a new trial. What's taking them so long to order it? How did these members of "law" enforcement think that they could get away with this outrageous criminal behavior that framed three innocent men, one still a child, cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars, and left a killer loose on our streets? Could it be because they knew that they had the power to treat the victims of crime as second class citizens a.k.a. peons or surfs? Did our Founders foolishly leave us with no power to control our government other than through elections? If you want to find out about the other check on government abuse of power that our Founders provided for us, then read What Happens When the People Lose the Power to Control Government and What You Can Do to Take the Power Back? Here are a couple of passages from that article which point out the importance of the right to present evidence of criminal conduct to a grand jury. Justice Bradley also pointed out that if a person was deprived of the right to bring a criminal complaint to a grand jury that person was reduced from the status of a free citizen to no more than a slave. He stated, "To deprive a whole class of the community of this right, to refuse their evidence and their sworn complaints, is to brand them with a badge of slavery; is to expose them to wanton insults and fiendish assaults; is to leave their lives, their families, and their property unprotected by law. It gives unrestricted license and impunity to vindictive outlaws and felons to rush upon these helpless people and kill and slay them at will, as was done in this case." Id at 599. Imagine if a citizen presented evidence to a grand jury showing that a "law" enforcement officer withheld evidence which showed that these defendants were not guilty. Do you think that the citizens on the grand jury would indict these "law" enforcement officers for engaging in a conspiracy to deprive these innocent men of their rights which carries criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C §§ 241 and 242? I do, and I think that the loss of this inestimable right is why our government has become so corrupt and abusive. Obviously, these "law" enforcement officers knew that they were framing these two innocent men and an innocent teenager, but they chose to trample their rights and deprive them of their liberty. I think that a lot of the fraud and abuse routinely committed by members of "law" enforcement would stop if they knew that we could present complaints about criminal violations directly to a grand jury again. If you want to know more about this, check out the Rule of Law radio show with Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens on Monday and Thursday nights from 9 to 11 Eastern and on Friday nights from 9 to 1 AM Eastern. Listen live at http://www.wtprn.com/listen.shtml or check out the archives at http://mp3.wtprn.com/Kelton08.html This show focuses on the right that each citizen has to present evidence of criminal conduct to grand juries, and I’m a regular guest on Thursdays. Here is a link to the videos that You Tube kept pulling down showing the brutal strip search of Hope Steffey mentioned in my article above. For more about Hope's story of abuse at the hands of "law" enforcement for reporting a crime, see The Peoples Voice article The State Torture of Hope Steffey Here are more videos showing just a small fraction of the criminal abuse meeted out by "law" enforcement in America. Wake up America, and take some action to demand reform! I'm glad to see that Michael has and that he is doing something about it! by Mark Adams (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 312 comments [39 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:46:17 PM
|
|
Peak was bomber but not caller
Although 15 year old Duane Peak was the confessed bomber and caller he was indeed likely the person who planted the bomb. A number of witnesses placed him and a suitcase in proximity to the bombing. Peak apparently also had an older accomplice, perhaps a relative, that he protected by asserting he made the call. What this article did not address was all of the false dynamite testimony in the case that I have previously written about. Those interested in knowing more should explore my Opednews.com archives for earlier stories on the case. Justice is long overdue in this case. by Michael Richardson (107 articles, 22 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 78 comments) on Saturday, Oct 4, 2008 at 3:35:45 PM
|
|
Thanks for...
...another informative article. One day will we see COINTELPRO fully exposed. by Hans Bennett (25 articles, 117 quicklinks, 141 diaries, 246 comments [35 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:35:57 PM
|
|
Nebraska Supreme Court
That's the U.S. or you. Truth, Justice and the American way!! by Bryan Emmel (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 415 comments [32 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:26:23 AM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |