Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

NY Loves Its Levers as New Systems Fail

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/1/08

"The voting industry sells crap, and that is the problem."  Douglas A. Kellner, Co-Chair New York State Board of Elections  

Vote for lever voting machine or computerized system in this poll.  

I received a cache of documents surrounding NY's electoral system.  Some of this material indicates justified resistance to computerized systems that fail to perform as intended, despite being certified.  Some exposes deliberate info-suppression, preventing election officials from acting in the best interest of the public. One NY attorney extensively researched NY's election law history, showing the wisdom and security of prior law. A University of Virginia professor researched lever voting machines and provides a dire warning about new technology with its paper-based audit trail.  This lengthy piece synthesizes the material for those interested in New York's battle to retain election integrity or to implement wholly condemned systems that have failed across the nation.  

New York doesn't use computerized voting systems.  For over a century, it has protected election integrity by using a mechanical lever voting system that can be reliably tested, combined with a brilliant legislative scheme that anticipates every opportunity for election fraud – from insiders and from voters; from before, during and after the election.  Yet, New York may join the 49 other lemming states in electoral suicide, with its 2005 Election Reform and Modernization Act (ERMA), as amended.  

Problems continue to emerge across the nation with the use of computerized voting systems, and none of the vendors hawking computerized technology meet NY's guidelines for doing business only with responsible vendors. Last year, Attorney Andi Novick sent a 60-page, well-researched memo to NY officials, providing details of the shady connections, failed performance, and efforts of vendors to suppress damning evidence of their product.  She later supplemented that research with a 21-page memo.

NY Loves Its Levers 

The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) does not require states to buy irredeemable computerized voting systems.  Lever voting systems satisfy all but one of HAVA's requirements, as Douglas Kellner, Co-Chair of the New York State Board of Elections (SBOE) testified: 

"[HAVA] sets minimum standards for voting machines. Our lever machines satisfy all but one of those standards, that there be at least one machine at each poll site that is 'accessible for individuals with disabilities....'"  

Most NY officials have not been blinded by the glitz of high-tech wizardry. NY has kept its levers for the past six years, while elections across the nation crashed, glitched, and otherwise left the public even less confident in US elections. NY kept its levers when the nation switched to punchcard systems, which eventually brought us Florida's 2000 "election." Kellner decried these failed computerized systems at a June 19th SBOE meeting: 

"The voting industry sells crap, and that is the problem.... 

"With the scanners I'm not going to get caught in this bargain with the devil. If the vendors do not have a product that today complies with the guidelines, I'm not prepared to use it.  

"And I'm prepared to go back to Judge Sharpe and to say: 'Judge, it would be unconstitutional to enforce [HAVA] by requiring us to replace the lever voting machines with scanning equipment or DRE equipment or any equipment that does not comply with the current guidelines.'"

In naming Judge Sharpe, Kellner is referencing the 2006 Dept. of Justice lawsuit against the SBOE for failure to implement disabled-accessible voting devices and a statewide computerized voter database as required by HAVA.

Also resisting the effort to employ expensive gadgets that don't work is a mounting revolution on both sides of the aisle.  Republican commissioner Gregory Peterson, newly appointed to the SBOE, expressed his bafflement at that June 19th meeting: 

"[I]f it doesn't work the way you said it was going to work, we're better with a lever - just pushing down levers. And if the judge doesn't understand that then he's going to have to be made to understand that."  

NY Experiences Software Failure  

In accord with Judge Sharpe's order, NY must install disabled-accessible voting devices in the Fall 2008 election.  Testing is underway, with three systems approved: Sequoia/Dominion Imagecast, ES&S Automark, and Premier (formerly Diebold) Automark. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Save NY's Levers; Reject Computerized Voting

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks to the great atate of New York for waiving ... by Brent Turner on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:20:25 AM
POLL: Lever Voting Machines or Computerized System... by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:23:42 AM
Thank you Rady for publicising a "third road&... by Guitar Chris on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:56:55 PM
Thanks, GitarChris, for your open mind.  I ha... by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:17:37 PM
Paper ballots counted at the polling station immed... by John Haigh on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:38:06 AM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum