Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

NATO, is there an alternative? You bet.

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Adnan Al-Daini     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/24/10

Author 55822
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -


Martin Kettle in Britain's Guardian newspaper writes:

"Supporters as well as critics of NATO converge on the point. The great achievement of NATO is that it has helped to keep the peace in Europe - with occasional exceptions - for more than 60 years. The longer this peace lasts, and the more distant the memory of war becomes, the more it needs to be reiterated that this is an epochal achievement on the grand historic scale."

Why does an experienced journalist accept such a meaningless assertion? This statement aims to frighten people into accepting the prioritization of defence spending above everything else; NATO must continue to exist, vast sums must be spent or there would be wars on our door step. Oh, really? The same politics of fear was invoked during the Vietnam War citing the "domino doctrine", stated simply as: that if the communists were to take over South Vietnam, it would lead to the spread of communism, which would threaten the United States. America was defeated in 1975 and South Vietnam became part of a communist united Vietnam. That war resulted in the death of 4.5 million Vietnamese and Laotians and 58,000 Americans (Wikipedia). Communism did not spread in spite of that defeat; of course, had America won the war, it would have claimed credit for saving the world from communism.

The Soviet Union declined and finally collapsed by the burden of its war in Afghanistan and the failure of its economic model. Had American politicians been wise, the Vietnamese and American people could have been spared the carnage, the misery, and the expenditure on a pointless war. Is there a lesson for the United States here?

According to Wikipedia, the combined military spending of NATO is 70% of the world's total military spending, with the United States alone accounting for 43% of the world's total military spending. It is not surprising, then, that those governments, supporters and those mildly critical of NATO would make such an assertion. How else is the American government going to justify a defence budget of 663 billion dollars amounting to 4.3% of GDP? It is clear that the purpose of such massive military hardware and fire power is to bully and intimidate nations to compel them to toe the line in their foreign and economic policies.

- Advertisement -

On Iran he opines:

"The other big subject is Iran, whose conduct plays to NATO's need to find a new threat - not without reason in this case - against which it can justify its existence. Iran's intention of producing missiles that would threaten Europe is now treated as a given by NATO strategists"

"Not without reason in this case"! It seems that missiles developed in NATO countries are not armed with warheads, but "peaceheads" and, of course, they could not possibly be a threat to anyone; however, Iran's missiles are nasty and threaten the security of Europe. Tell that to the people of Iraq, Iran's neighbours. The West seems to be incapable or unwilling to see it from the Iranians' perspective. Iran is surrounded by American bases and armies in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Gulf, and subject to the constant bellicose rhetoric of a nuclear armed Israel. Having witnessed the devastation of Iraq, is it any wonder the Iranians want to develop their military capability to avoid the fate that has befallen Iraq? It is now clear that Iraq was attacked because it was weak and was thought of as an easy target. It was the fierce resistance in that country that stopped Iran and Syria from being targeted next, as the neocons explicitly stated prior to the invasion.

The existence of NATO risks militarising every problem to the detriment of the lives of its countries' citizens and millions across the globe. End it; slash the defence budgets and use the money to help people cope with life as they struggle to survive the harshness of the depressed economic climate in America and Europe. Reach out to people of other regions and cultures in the spirit of mutual respect. America and the west need to empathise and put themselves in the position of the "other" to envision the world from the perspective of people at the receiving end of NATO's war machine.

Will any of this happen? It will only happen when Americans wake up and take power from voracious corporations, aided and abetted by their cheerleaders in mainstream media that is diminishing the quality of their lives.

Now, that would be a truly worthy vision to strive for.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Dr Adnan Al-Daini took early retirement in 2005 as a principal lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at a British University. His PhD in Mechanical Engineering is from Birmingham University, UK. He has published numerous applied scientific research (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Libyan revolution

The Pursuit of Happiness. America, live up to the ideals of your Declaration of Independence

The Power of the Media

The Obscenity of War and Military Spending in a World of Need and Suffering

Global Warming: Doing Nothing or Very Little Is Not an Option

Education -- Heading to Mediocrity for the Many