Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   14 comments

General News

Museum Continues 9/11 Mystification

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Valuable 3   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/5/14

Become a Fan
  (28 fans)
- Advertisement -

9/11 Museum World Trade Center Evidence: No Plane Hit Pentagon?

By William Boardman -- Reader Supported News


UNIVERSAL WARNING SIGN by islandvisuals.com

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

Astronomer Carl Sagan was fond of saying this when talking about the possibility of intelligent life existing elsewhere in the universe. Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld also used the expression in his own portrayal of intelligent life on this planet, in reference to his inability to find Saddam Hussein's WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) that didn't exist.

It's a basically useful mindset that has both useful and useless applications, as in Rumsfeld's using it to mean, apparently, something like: "we don't need no stinking evidence, we know his WMDs used to exist, we believe they still exist, and that's good enough -- trust us."

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" applies as well to the events of September 11, 2001, and it's still not clear which usage applies best to which argument from any perspective. The assumption here is that, at a minimum, the official 9/11 story is false in some of its essentials. The official 9/11 story has too many elements to assume they're all false, or even that they're mostly false. On the contrary, whether one assumes official honesty or an official cover-up, the motive is the same: to get as much right as possible and/or necessary. The best lies are embedded in truth.

- Advertisement -

The 9/11 Museum is full of contradictions, acknowledged and ignored

The National September 11 Memorial Museum (cost $700 million) opened ceremonially in New York City on May 15, 2014. The Museum (operating budget $60 million a year) opened publicly six days later (admission $24). The openings were characterized by both reverence (President Obama called the museum a "sacred place of healing and hope") and controversy (over the gift shop, and especially its Darkness Hoodie ($39) and its United-States-shaped cheese platter with hearts marking 9/11 death sites (price unavailable), as well as serious censorship (no charge) and the CEO's salary ($378,000)).

A "Museum Review" in the New York Times pondered the museum's "trifurcated identity:"

Was it going to be primarily a historical document, a monument to the dead or a theme-park-style tourist attraction? How many historical museums are built around an active repository of human remains, still being added to? How many cemeteries have a $24 entrance fee and sell souvenir T-shirts? How many theme parks bring you, repeatedly, to tears?

Because that's what the museum does. The first thing to say about it, and maybe the last, is that it's emotionally overwhelming".

- Advertisement -

Despite that overwhelming ad hominem character, emphasizing the emotional impact of the lives of the living and dead, the Museum defines itself with a contradictory pose of academic detachment: "The National September 11 Memorial Museum serves as the country's principal institution concerned with exploring the implications of the events of 9/11, documenting the impact of those events and exploring 9/11's continuing significance." More credibly, the Museum defines its mission as bearing witness to the World Trade Center attacks of 1993 and 2001. Most compellingly, the 9/11 Museum seems to be a guardian of the official 9/11 story.

Omission can also be a form of bearing witness

Among the 9/11 Museum artifacts on display (its collection numbers more than 10,000 items, mostly small and personal), there are parts of the Boeing 767 airliners that hit the twin towers. The larger artifacts include a charred piece of fuselage with a missing window and the "World Trade Center Cross" (that a federal judge has ruled an "artifact," not a violation of the First Amendment separation of church and state). The Museum also has a collection of unidentified or unclaimed human body parts, some 14,000 of them, stored in an underground repository not open to the public.

Without apparently intending to do so, the 9/11 Museum's body of evidence that tends to reinforce the official 9/11 story in New York, also tends to reinforce longstanding questions about the official 9/11 story at the Pentagon. That story is that the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757 carrying 58 passengers and 6 crew) flew into the Pentagon at almost ground level, killing all aboard as well as 125 in the building (all but five of whom were, eventually, officially identified).

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"... it might be instructive to hear President Bu... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:46:43 AM
As I am sure you know.Cheney would not allow he an... by George W.Reichel on Friday, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:46:01 PM
Not to mention "reality problems"! ... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:56:04 PM
Representative John Conyers never publicly mention... by Lance Ciepiela on Saturday, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:19:27 AM
Went to your first link and found this: "Misprisio... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:41:46 PM
Daniel - thanks. Would you kindly comment on the o... by Lance Ciepiela on Saturday, Jun 7, 2014 at 7:42:18 PM
I just sent this link to myself, because of course... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:39:02 PM
Interesting, but fuzzy timeline. Memo seems to da... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:20:27 PM
I suspect there is no mention of Bldg. 7 at the mu... by intotheabyss on Thursday, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:36:08 PM
A quick search of the 9/11 Museum website shows th... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:30:09 PM
The Museum should have defined it's true mission a... by Lance Ciepiela on Thursday, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:45:36 PM
The official 9/11 narrative is the most unbelievab... by George W.Reichel on Friday, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:42:59 PM
With all due respect, I'll strike the first and pe... by Daniel Noel on Friday, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:19:51 PM
Dear Daniel Noel, Discordancy doesn't bother me, b... by William Boardman on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:15:46 PM