Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

General News

Mrs. John McTiernan's Statement Regarding her Husband's Surrender

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   News 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/5/13

(Article changed on April 8, 2013 at 10:45)

(Article changed on April 8, 2013 at 01:06)

John McTiernan, director of Die Hard, Predator, The Hunt for Red October and other films, surrendered to federal prison.  His wife, Gail, breaks the silence they've maintained for years after the Government multiplied his charges for challenging the prosecutor's actions.

(Article changed on April 5, 2013 at 04:42)


John McTiernan by "Free John McTiernan" Facebook page


April 3, 2013
(updated 4/7/2013 in response to questions)

My husband was forced to give up his seven year fight to keep his freedom today.

Throughout the whole seven year nightmare John kept his faith -- I think really his father's faith -- in the system.  He believed that if he, with all of his advantages, couldn't fight the government"then who possibly could"and what kind of country was that?  He thought of it as almost a duty to his children.  He kept plugging forward, naively shelling out a fortune for lawyers, confident that eventually their prosecutorial overreach would be heard before an unbiased judge and set things right.  

The Federal Government has now imprisoned a man, with no prior criminal record, for saying a single false word on the phone (the answer of "yep") to a stranger's voice he could not have possibly known or verified was law enforcement.  Given the years of calls from fans or journalists, sometimes parading as a form of law enforcement, the responses to the caller that evening at dinner were a courteous gesture. He decided during the Schwarzenegger campaign to respond to those calls rather than having "No Comment" following the statement, "When the director was asked about girls in Arnold's trailer on the set...he replied "No comment.""  Given that was inaccurate, and had witnessed nothing improper, John decided to talk to people who called to avoid any misunderstanding. 

The phone call that evening dealt exclusively with John's knowledge of his former divorce attorney Dennis Wasser's involvement with Anthony Pellicano. The only questions asked by the man involved Wasser's knowledge of wiretapping.  He explained nothing illegal was proposed by Wasser. The agent made the statement, "And that's the only time you hired Pellicano, right?" to which John responded, "Yep, and I have to get back to my kids," and the call ended.

Not giving the call another thought, John was shocked when two weeks later that phone call resulted in the threat of a federal felony charge.  Everyone presumes the FBI comes to your door, black suits, badges showing.  The FBI Manual certainly states the credentials must be shown so the person knows to whom they are speaking.  How does that happen with a phone call? During the    subsequent proffer day, the Government was clearly agitated with John's lack of knowledge concerning Wasser's activity. AUSA Dan Saunders then prosecuted John under a Section 1001 False Statement felony with a potential five year prison sentence for his telephone response "yep" as he had actually hired Pellicano twice.   

He pled guilty upon advice of counsel and later withdrew the guilty plea when he realized he had a defense to the false statement charge.  The Court denied his request to withdraw his guilty plea yet he Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with McTiernan.  After the win, the Government quadrupled the charges and took away his chance for a fair trial.  He filed a conditional guilty plea and then appealed again to the Ninth but a panel of a different political ilk sided with the Government.  (Both panels consisted of a combination of each party.) His request to be heard by the United States Supreme Court was denied. 

He's since filed a habeas motion as it has been discovered that the alleged wiretap of Charles Roven (co-producer of Rollerball) never occurred, that Atlas (a Roven company) was a client of Pellicano, and that Pellicano former employees have never seen the alleged summaries of wiretapped calls.   Simple phone messages were paraded as a synopses of calls.   In addition, the hard drive given to defense attorneys that was to prove where evidence against John originated was in such a condition that the defense expert witness concluded "recovery and verification of any content would be impossible."    

The   "summary of wiretapped calls" evidence against McTiernan has never to this day been delivered to our defense lawyers .  The pending habeas petition could have been decided before he ever set foot near a federal prison as his sentence is undoubtedly questioned by the newly discovered information.   The Government has stalled his case with years of delays in filings, and filed their reply to the habeas just two days ago -- a month late.  That month was crucial to him and would have given time for his lawyers to file a response.  Last week we learned that the perjury indictment was created out of thin air.   He was sentenced for a crime that isn't a crime. There is no basis for a charge.   More legal issues must be remedied.   Now with John in custody, the delays as a tactical strategy are sure to continue. 

This quest for justice is not yet over for me. 

Celebrities and well known people  are contacted through their attorneys or managers and with FBI credentials easily visible and traditionally interviewed in the presence of their attorneys.  It raises the serious question why John, who had both an attorney and a manager in Los Angeles, was contacted at home over the phone, after hours. Unusual practices to say the least.  

During pre-trial proceedings, the Government proposed, and the judge decided that evidence that would prove the many improper procedures in this case should not be allowed to be heard by the jury .  Even his expert witness would not be allowed to testify. In my husband's case the charge against him effectively became:  telling a lie.  Period.  Whether he knew who he was talking to or not was irrelevant and as I said, not to be mentioned in front of the jury.  They went further actually, defining anything the Prosecutor didn't agree with as "Attempts at Jury Nullification," for which his attorney would be sanctioned if he tried.

Next Page  1  |  2

 


Gail Sistrunk is the Vice President and Executive Director of Project Save Justice, an organization that educates the public about the U.S. Justice Department. Its current focus is on political prosecutions of elected officials, their (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Mrs. John McTiernan's Statement Regarding her Husband's Surrender

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The basic freedoms that Americans have enjoyed, by... by Gail Sistrunk McTiernan on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:07:00 AM
Please keep us posted. I also have the kind of fai... by Meryl Ann Butler on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:47:40 AM
It makes you hope there is a hell where these tyra... by Derryl Hermanutz on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:35:41 PM
I hope their suffering is much sooner. :-)  ... by Gail Sistrunk McTiernan on Sunday, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:44:45 AM
For those of us who know nothing about John McTie... by Paul Repstock on Saturday, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:28:51 AM
We are our brothers keeper and for those who have ... by Gail Sistrunk McTiernan on Sunday, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:48:02 AM