Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 7, 2009 at 02:33:45

Must Read 5   Valuable 4   Interesting 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Most of the Founding Fathers and Early Presidents Were Deists and Freemasons, Not Christians

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Ruth (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Ruth - Writer

The founding fathers wanted not only to establish freedom of religion. They also wanted to establish freedom from religious bigotry and theocratic imposition. They wanted to ensure that no religious sect or denomination could dominate or rule, and they also wanted to ensure that no specific religion could dominate or rule.

Thomas Jefferson said: "The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man." – Thomas Jefferson, 1800

Madison, Franklin, Paine, Adams and others agreed with Jefferson, and later so did Abraham Lincoln.

Jefferson said: "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State." – Thomas Jefferson, 1802

Jefferson’s views on that matter were shared by most of the founding fathers. And the historic truth flies in the face of certain leaders of the so-called "Christian Right" in America, who have been and still are making false claims about the intent of the founding fathers, and they have misled many people in their spiritually blind flocks. In fact, they have succeeded to the extent that during the 2008 presidential election campaigns, being a Christian became a litmus test for being the President of the United States of America, and that is in direct violation of the intent of the founding fathers!

Most of the founding fathers were pluralistic and democratic in their views on religion. As I said, they did their best to ensure that there was a separation of church and state so that no religion or religious sect was favored or had dominant influence.

The writings of Jefferson, Madison, Adams, Paine and Franklin were particularly adamant about that. Their writings also show they were very wary and disapproving of religious superstition, bigotry, intolerance, hypocrisy, aggression, imposition, and persecution. They were very critical of certain right-wing Christian leaders in that regard.

In fact, Jefferson wrote: "The returning good sense of our country threatens the clergy and they believe that any portion of power confided to me will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly; for I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me, and enough too in their opinion, and this is the cause of their printing lying pamphlets against me. . ."

Jefferson incurred the wrath of self-important and self-righteous Christian preachers who were much like the leaders of the "Christian Right" today, because he did not hide his disdain for them. He dared to echo the feelings of many of his fellow educated men of faith, as when he wrote: "Whenever preachers, instead of a lesson in religion, put [their congregations] off with a discourse on the construction of government, or the characters or conduct of those administering it, it is a breach of contract."

Clearly, Jefferson felt that preachers should not use their pulpit as a partisan political soap box, especially when their personal beliefs and opinions were presented as divine truth. Jefferson stood up to their political grandstanding cloaked in religion, and he exposed their "tyrannical" aggression and imposition. And they hated him for it.

But, you should know that, like me, Jefferson was only against the "corruptions" of Christianity, and against the religious bigotry and hypocrisy of arrogant, self-important and self-righteous people who claimed to be Christian authorities. Like me, Jefferson loved the actual teachings of Jesus. In fact, Jefferson wrote that: "Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern, which have come under my observation, none appear to me so pure as that of Jesus."

Jefferson even compiled a reformed version of the gospels to rescue the philosophy of Jesus and the "pure principles which he taught," from the "corruptions and artificial vestments" which were established as "instruments of riches and power" for church patriarchs. Like me, Jefferson concluded that Jesus never claimed to be God, and he regarded much of the New Testament as corrupted with "palpable interpolations and falsifications." In other words, Jefferson separated ethical and true teachings from the religious doctrine and dogma and other fictional supernatural elements that were intermixed in the gospels between the mid-first century and the fourth century when the Christian Bible was compiled and edited. Jefferson called his book "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth Extracted Textually from the Gospels." He didn’t publish it, because he regarded religious beliefs as a private matter. But now people know it as The Jefferson Bible (of Jesus).

James Madison felt the same way Jefferson did about organized religious bigots. In 1875 Madison wrote: "What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not."

Madison also wrote: "Strongly guarded as is the separation between Religion and Government in the Constitution of the United States, the danger of encroachment by [Christian] Ecclesiastical Bodies, may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history."

Benjamin Franklin, a founding father and a genius, felt the same way. He became a Deist after educating himself and turning away from his rigid and oppressive puritanical Protestant Christian upbringing. He learned to appreciate Deism, which was popular among many educated men of faith at the time, because it is the belief in the existence of God on the evidence of reason and nature, with rejection of superstition. That is why George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe, the first five presidents of the United States, were Deists, and their religious perspective was more close to that of today’s Unitarian Universalists than any other.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Most of the Founding Fathers and Early Presidents Were Deists and Freemasons, Not Christians

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://reformationcomingsoon.bravehost.com

I'm an ex-Nun, and I became so after reading the writings of Karen Armstrong, who is also an ex-Nun. She wrote the best-selling books, The History of God, and The Battle for God, and she makes a lot of sense to me. Then I became a Deist and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Christian taliban"
America's Social Taliban
by John Doe Christian

$14.95

Number of pages: 128
Publisher: CreateSpace

Afghan Journal: A Soldier's Year In Afghanistan
by Jeff Courter

$15.95

Number of pages: 392
Publisher: CreateSpace

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
37 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

right on by liberalsrock on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:27:18 AM
Yes by shadow dancer on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:43:22 AM
Shadow Dancer, Regarding Rome by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:35:16 PM
Jesus by shadow dancer on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:10:11 PM
To Shadow Dancer, this is what it has to do with you by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:26:42 PM
I Don't Have Any by shadow dancer on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:55:26 PM
Shadow, regarding your "prophetic viewpoint" by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:43:28 PM
I Have Only by shadow dancer on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:19:33 PM
Now I know Wovoca's story too by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:23:42 PM
I Am by shadow dancer on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:54:58 PM
Please. Stop contradicting yourself by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:28:38 PM
Shadow Dancer, Regarding Jesus by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:41:39 PM
I Have Seen by shadow dancer on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:55:24 PM
I have seen too by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:30:07 PM
Ruth by shadow dancer on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:04:18 AM
American Malvern by Keystone on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:43:53 PM
Yes, it's "Christians" for world domination by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:12:22 PM
I've Already by shadow dancer on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:02:34 AM
Shadow, don't be too sure by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:44:18 PM
You've by shadow dancer on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:58:03 PM
Hmmmm..... Really? by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:15:14 PM
Ruth by shadow dancer on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:10:22 PM
In denial much? by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:57:43 PM
I Sow Where by shadow dancer on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:22:09 PM
Examine your motives by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:27:24 PM
The Author is also a Singer of New Songs by Ruth on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:05:11 PM
Bravo--Great article by Mark Biskeborn on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:54:36 PM
Thanks Mark by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:36:27 PM
It is the law... by Pulladigm on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:25:29 PM
Wisdom by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:15:32 PM
His Name? by Ruth on Monday, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:28:51 PM
RUTH by WML on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:33:26 PM
W.M.L. You don't get the message. by Ruth on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:47:48 PM
W.M.L. didn't read enough, and misses the point by Sarah Morgan on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:14:41 PM
"New Jerusalem, the Bride" Has Come by Ruth on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:34:46 PM
Well Done, Ruth by Sarah Morgan on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:01:54 PM
Thanks. You know it's not easy. by Ruth on Wednesday, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:40:01 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum