It is interesting to watch the way our MSM beats around the bush. Take a Rand Paul story. Rachel Maddow interviewed the guy who looked like a total phony and asked him if he would vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act and also should all the establishments not discriminate. Of course, he answers Aye to the first and Nay to the second; he runs on the libertarian platform, what do you expect? The problem is not with Rand Paul; it is with the question. The proper question should be:
-Dr. Paul, if a private establishment discriminates by color, ethnicity or other means, a)Would you become a patron of such establishment and b) As a lawmaker what would you propose to do about such establishments?
See, the issue should be with the reality. Here's a person who wants to become a lawmaker and here's a country which already had been functioning under certain laws. If the future lawmaker somehow considers doing nothing when confronted with the unlawful situation we will find it out when he answers the properly asked question and vice- versa. Put him on the defensive. Ask him what would he do? But there wasn't such question, not even close. And no one else, none of the MSM people who discussed this even mentioned such question. Why?
As I have said, MSM beats around the bush about 99% of the time. The real reason for asking dumb questions is the expectation of the dumb answers. The whole idea of that dialogue as well of countless other dialogues of that nature is to do anything but connecting the dots. It would be a total disaster for any MSM pundit to be consistent on any issue; in short, every event, interview or report are never associated with anything bigger and have no goal other then" yes, entertain. It is entertainment and it cannot be disturbing. You cannot ask the proper question because such question if wrongly answered immediately makes all the good people of Kentucky who voted for that guy at least morons if not malicious bigots. Rand Paul answering something abstract in the views area is Rand Paul, the man; Rand Paul specifying what would he do is an elected candidate-lawmaker, the hope of his constituents. Caught my drift?
I could never figure out when did that happen. On what stage of the journalistic career do they whisper all those unwritten rules into the rookie's ear; when does the fresh young person becomes an SOB on the retainer? Rachel Maddow is not that bad. Others are worse. But all of them seem to KNOW some secret- how to discuss the topic without actually addressing it. It is the highest art of whoring- the one on the molecular level.
This idea of discussing with no conclusions is a Rosemary's baby of the US political elite. It makes our MSM a conglomerate of eunuchs and sociopaths. Sociopaths concentrate under the pseudo-conservative banner like Fox News. There those nutcases are lavishly paid for howling. There is no meaning in what they say, no news either. Their goal is the malicious noise. That noise must contain a special group of words, though with no meaning but with the high frequency of usage: liberals, conservatives, freedom, love, security, responsibility, capitalism, socialism, family values, God, GOP, etc.
Many years ago in one Russian book they described an idiot who wanted to be newspaper columnist but could not write. A cynical conman sold him a "universal package' of words, sentences and paragraphs, which could be used to describe ANY event in a newspaper. That package was small- about two pages long and contained all possible cliches you could imagine. That's how our sociopaths operate. The eunuchs are a little different. They are supposed to be progressive and smart. Thus instead of howling they squeal. The best example would be a Haiti earthquake. Some eunuch would deliver a report on the actual event and" stop short on the issue why Haiti in 1940s under the similar earthquake lost about a 1000 people and now the casualties are astronomical. They just stop talking. The role of the US in the treacherous destruction of the Haiti society is" not discussed. Even worse about wars. Up till now we still do not hear even from the most liberal MSNBC the clear statement if the wars we wage are right or wrong. How about drones? How about secret prisons? No, I do not want to hear long discussions of different points of view. Right or wrong, folks. Is Obama right with his drone killings? Yes or no. Is Bush as SOB? Yes or no. Don't tell me I have to make my own choice- I have made one. You have all the info, you have the means- it is your duty as professionals to make an informed conclusion. Your sociopath colleagues already made one. They did not need any information. How come you are still wobbling?
Oh, I forgot, you are eunuchs, chemically castrated people. Wobbling is all you've got.
Whoring is usually a tool of the weak. Sometimes those weak proclaim themselves cunning pragmatists and explain their whoring as some kind of a political maneuver. That's bullshit. Our system had developed the whole generation of weaklings, people with no guts, no professional skills, no capability of standing on their own feet, people who sell themselves every day like whores sell themselves on the streets. Only whores do not enjoy that; these people do. They are not only physical but also spiritual eunuchs- they not only like their way of life but they maintain it so it does not change in any way. They distribute a whoring poison so that healthy people become like them. And that's how we get Johnny the Plumber or Sarah, the Unfortunate. That's why our military lies and our officials lie and our President lies too. They lie because they can. They lie because they are convinced that the whole world is a bordello full of whores and no one gives a damn.
It makes me sick every time I see those sociopaths and eunuchs making stupid noises and becoming richer every day. It is as if we all live in some grotesque world. It is not even Orwellian. It is a culmination of the hypocritical morality when hypocrisy stops being just a tool and becomes a part of the national character, something genetic, something embedded like a possession of sorts. It is horrifying. Some Russian sources had already discovered and analyzed that phenomena on their own. Imitators are easier to study, you know. So, there they call such behavior " blyadoustvo' -that is the whorespeaking, the case when a person becomes a prostitute in everything and propagates it on the others. In the Russian orthodox theology such behavior is classified as a form of Satanism. Maybe we witness that, what do you think?