Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Mitt Romney's Hard-Right Agenda

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (162 fans)   -- Page 1 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com

Mitt Romney's Hard-Right Agenda - by Stephen Lendman

Mitt Romney represents destructive/corrupt money power in America.

Currently, five Republican presidential aspirants remain. Weak support caused others to suspend campaigns or drop out. 

In November, voters have unpalatable options between a lawless/crime boss/militarist/pro-war/anti-populist/morally corrupt president, and a rogue's gallery of alternatives looking more like a police lineup than legitimate candidates.

Ron Paul's an exception for wanting the Fed abolished and America's wealth no longer squandered on imperial wars. At the same time, he stops short of endorsing peace, favors strong national defense policies, is uncompromisingly pro-business, and wants social spending ended, leaving America's least advantaged on their own. 

In contrast, OWS and other progressives want long denied social justice. Voting Republican or Democrat assures continuation of America's dark side, including under Romney. He's a candidate no one should trust.

In mid-December, ABC News said he called himself "the ideal" Tea Party candidate because his views replicate theirs. Its platform calls for:


  • tax cuts for the rich;

  • eliminating the national debt, though doing so precipitously would wreck the economy;

  • eliminating deficit spending immediately despite its beneficial stimulative effects when needed;

  • free, not fair, market capitalism;

  • abiding by constitutional law and states rights;

  • promoting civic responsibility to preserve life, liberty and pursuit of happiness; by "happiness" in America's Declaration of Independence, Jefferson meant property; so do Tea Party leaders;

  • reducing government size by ending all social spending at federal, state and local levels;

  • freeing people to operate as they wish within the law, no matter the consequences for others;

  • avoiding ill-defined political pitfalls; and

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments