Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 33 Share on Facebook 7 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (43 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Military's Subsidy of Limbaugh Insults Taxpayers

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 3/6/12

- Advertisement -

The Pentagon's defiant pledge to stick with the Rush Limbaugh show no matter what bumps up against a few hard and insulting realities. The Armed Forces Network that carries the Limbaugh show is not a private business, corporation, or proprietorship that can do whatever it pleases with its money, personnel, operations and policy. Every penny of the armed forces bloated budget comes from tax payers. The Armed Forces Network which has beamed the Limbaugh show for two decades is oiled to the tune of an estimated 27 million dollars annually. Every penny of which comes from the pockets of taxpayers. And since the military is not a democracy, and decisions are made top down, there was never any chance that taxpayers would have any say about the use of their money to subsidize the naked bias of one radio jock at public expense.

The same rule applies to those in the military that have had Limbaugh shoved down their listening palate. They are the tens of thousands of servicemen and women who dial up the network. They are young, many well-educated, and just as important, female and minority. Blacks make up nearly 20 percent of the armed forces. Hispanics make up nearly 15 percent. Women make up from 10 to 20 percent in the four armed services. Like it or not, Limbaugh's drumbeat war on and trash of women and minorities is a daily feature on their network. True, no one is putting a club to their head and forcing them to listen. But that's not the point. Whether they tune in or out, the show is an established part of the military's airwaves and has political influence and impact that reverberate beyond the listener's ears.

The network counters that it airs a "variety" of shows and views. It cites the liberal Ed Schultz show and NPR to prove that Limbaugh is only one voice and there's a view for everyone. There are problems with this claim too. Schultz "s show (2005) was added to the network's talk show line-up more than a decade after Limbaugh had ruled the military talk roost for a decade. And then it was only added after the first firestorm of protest from media groups that Limbaugh's views were biased, bigoted and one-sided, and hardly represented "balanced" news and information which is the much touted mandate of the network.

The initial demand to then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld the year before Schultz was added to the network was to can Limbaugh. That wasn't going to happen. Adding Schultz was the bone tossed out to squelch the protests

The other problem is that Limbaugh has been the flagship show on the network for a long time. It airs for one hour daily and is heard by millions locally and globally. The Armed Forces Network blew off every public squawk and complaint about the show down through the years not because it regards balanced views as a sacred broadcast right, but because of fear, badgering and intimidation from the GOP.

The show was plopped on the network in 1993 when dozens of GOP house members bullied then Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin into putting the show on. They didn't stop at the radio show. They also demanded that it run his mercifully flop of a TV show on the network too. The armed forces network then at least was more honest and made no pretense to con itself, the public and military personnel that the show presented "balanced" news and information. It flatly admitted that the show was biased. But, it still went ahead and made it a fixture in its broadcast line-up while parroting the conservative pressure point that not to air it would be tantamount to censorship. This was an Orwellian stretch that was left dangling during the next decade of government supported and licensed unabashed Limbaugh trashing and bashing of minorities, women, gays, the poor, and his always favored targets, Democrats, especially Democratic president Clinton, and with even more glee, President Obama.

- Advertisement -

The Armed Forces Network has been bombarded with letters, emails, a petition and a flood of angry responses on its feedback website to dump Limbaugh. But the military brass, being the military brass, is playing hardball. Limbaugh has been a fixture too long, and for many military personnel, a guy whose phony flag waving, patriotism, and mysoginism fits in neatly with a military that has deeply embedded this thinking in its culture for decades.

If the military was a private outfit it would still be open to attack for airing Limbaugh. But there's not much that a taxpayer could do to make it change. But it's not a private outfit, the military is bankrolled by taxpayers, and they have no obligation to subsidize bias, bigotry, and slander in the name of "balance." The Armed Forces Network must dump Limbaugh.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is host of the weekly Hutchinson Report Newsmaker Hour heard weekly on the nationally network broadcast Hutchinson Newsmaker Network.

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter:

- Advertisement -


Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a nationally acclaimed author and political analyst. He has authored ten books; his articles are published in newspapers and magazines nationally in the United States. Three of his books have been published in other (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The House is duty-bound to Bring Articles of Impeachment against Clarence Thomas

Tea Party Now a Huge GOP Liability

Think of the Two Decade Embarrassment of Thomas We Would Have Been Spared If We had known about Thomas's Porn Alleged Ob

Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall

Did Race Explain Penn State's Blind Eye to Sex Scandal?

Method to Thomas Madness on Obama Birth Certificate


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks for saying it.... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58:58 AM
Rush loves all wars he doesn't have to experience.... by Richard Pietrasz on Wednesday, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:42:24 PM
the final say on the show should come from the lis... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:17:17 PM
that you are arguing that misogyny, slander and de... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:23:49 AM
the concept of "free speech."  If someone fee... by Doc McCoy on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:28:16 AM
Free speech doesn't include the right to have a ra... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:23:09 PM
Protected from whom, by whom? Amendment I - Congr... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:23:22 PM
is it ironic that the Pentagon brass who had such ... by mrk * on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:06:54 AM