Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   13 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Eclipsed by the Conventions: Midnight Regulations Reduce Women To "A Uterus With Two Legs"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/23/08

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

Bush and the conservative religious right are at it again.  In the hushed corridors of the West Wing, K-Street, and Congress, they meet in secret, writing regulations for enactment in the twilight hours of the imperial Bush presidency that would roll back the progress women have made in the 20th century and beyond.  

The proposed change at the Department of Health would redefine some kinds of contraception as abortion, even contraception before implantation. Hospitals that offered such contraception would forfeit federal aid. They would also forfeit the aid if they refused to hire health professionals who opposed abortion or birth control. This regulatory change "could also undermine state laws that require hospitals to prove emergency contraception to rape victims," according to womensenews.

Frustrated by its failure to further infringe on the rights of women reproductive freedoms during the Bush administrations reign, the Religious Right has broadened its attack.  No longer only content to overturn Roe v. Wade, Republican political operatives and religious conservatives seek the negation of Griswold v. Connecticut – the case which serves as the basis for Roe v. Wade.  Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Constitution protected a right to privacy. The case involved a Connecticut law that prohibited the use of contraceptives. By a vote of 7-2, the Supreme Court invalidated the law on the grounds that it violated the "right to marital privacy". Since Griswold, the Supreme Court has cited the right to privacy in several rulings, most notably in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). The Supreme Court ruled that a woman's choice to have an abortion was protected as a private decision between her and her doctor.  Overturning Griswold v. Connecticut would effectively render Roe v. Wade "toothless" and its legal validity would most certainly be challenged before the Robert's Supreme Court – a court certain go further to the "right" under a McCain presidency.

Women's "freedom" to choose methods of reproductive control and independent family planning are under assault.  Behind closed-door deals are underway to redefine and control women's access to contraception via insurance coverage restrictions.  Ironically, Viagra will still be covered by drug plans.  Horrifically, McCain's pro-life stance may mean the pill is murder

Women, we are being given our walking papers back to the Dark Ages.  If McCain plants one of these misogynistic "Neanderthals" on the Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade will most certainly perish.  Under such a ruling, it is conceivable that a woman could be legally designated as "potentially pregnant" throughout her reproductive years and subject to laws that control her behaviors with the intent of promoting fetal implantation.  A miscarriage or birth defect could lead to suspicion and/or prosecution of a mother for 'child endangerment, manslaughter, or murder.'  After all, pregnancy is the punishment a woman must pay for sex -- period.   Why else deny her access to birth control?  Why deny married women access to birth control?  A woman will be reduced legally to not much more than a uterus with legs -- a receptacle for an 'citizen embryo' that possesses more rights under the law than she does.   

Wake up.  They are sneaking these regulations under the radar and it is a serious attack on women's human rights and civil liberties – government sanctioned.  Before you know it, you will be reporting to the Office of Uterine Control for a chat.

They have launched a covert attack to take away a woman's ability to determine whether she will become a mother or not.  It is forced servitude.  Relegated to the status of a "birthing vessel" for all humanity, women will be left with few choices:  give birth, self-inflict a miscarriage, seek a back-alley abortion, self-inflict sterilization to include a surgical hysterectomy, criminal castration of husband, or suicide.

Is this the future we want for our daughters? Contact HHS and your members of Congress

 

OpedNews volunteer from 2005 to 2013.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
So many years after the two seminal court decision... by WML on Saturday, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:13:28 PM
All benefit from contraception, so why is it being... by Amanda Lang on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:58:24 AM
I am both pro-choice and in favor of publicly fina... by WML on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:59:17 PM
They [whoever the 'they' in they are] ... by Sandy Sand on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:23:10 AM
Women in this country will go to Washington D.C. a... by Linda Bailey on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:51:56 AM
Women could just say "no" to sex!!! Let&... by Linda Bailey on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:57:33 AM
Women may not be able to opt for a legal abortion,... by Amanda Lang on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:03:28 AM
People talk about the woman's rights, what about t... by Wretha Smith on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:42:00 PM
Abortion stops the beating heart of your child &nd... by Jane LeMond-Alvarez on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:07:07 PM
"However, no one has addressed the arguments ... by daveys on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:17:16 PM
Who are you responding to?  There are many wo... by Jane LeMond-Alvarez on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:39:29 PM
The quote I was responding to was written by WML i... by daveys on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:48:31 AM
 This is the post I just placed in reply to t... by Candace Frieze on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:18:57 PM