Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   15 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Michio Kaku: "We live in a Bubble" - eerily familiar excerpts from an older interview

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Funny 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/17/11

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
In September 2003 I had the pleasure to conduct an hour long interview with the famous Physicist Michio Kaku during a conference in Interlaken, Switzerland. The main topic was the search for life in the Universe, and we also talked about the possibility and likelyness of extraterrestrial civilizations. One major aspect was global terminal risks, and much of what we talked about sounds eerily family in the light of the current disaster in Japan. Below an excerpt from the Interview:



The author and Prof. Michio Kaku by Yvette Thiesen Sagra


Stefan Thiesen: The survival question in connection with complexity: how about disturbing complex systems we don't understand - like nature, like ecosystems, like the climate system...

Michio Kaku: It is very dangerous. We live in a web as they like to say and if you just jiggle one web you think that the next link is gonna change but of course it doesn't. It affects all other links in the chain, so it's quite dangerous the way that we are dependent on our ecosystems and that were changing our ecosystem so much. For example, five food crops return most of human diet. Five food crops, okay? Rice and wheat and things like that. Corn. Five crops. That's very dangerous because if we sit on top of the food chain and all of a sudden corn-blight or a wheat-blight affects all the rice and wheat and corn output, billions would starve as a consequence. You can affect the destiny of nations so we're quite dependent upon our environment, and it is a very narrow environment. It is a very narrow environment - we're dependent on a handful of animals"

ST: We've created this situation.

MK: We have created a bubble! A bubble on the top of the food chain. And it would not take very much to dislodge us because we live in a bubble. Five crops, a few animals that's what we depend upon. Cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens and five basic grain crops. That's very dangerous. And so hmm, you know sixty five million years ago a comet or meteor hit the Yucatan of Mexico and perhaps wiping out the dinosaurs. In some sense we are another comet. We have now hit the Earth. We are now destroying animal life on a scale not seen since sixty five million years ago.

ST: But if we are stuck on the planet for another few thousand years or a few hundred years at least, don't we have to stop growth?

MK: No. I think what's gonna happen is that there's gonna be some real big shocks. I think there are gonna be some real big shocks.

ST: But then growth also stops.

MK: Temporarily. I think there will be shocks. We're gonna be running out of oil pretty soon, the atmosphere is heating up very rapidly. Most people do nothing about it because they like their SUVs, they like their lifestyle, but the Earth is changing very rapidly now, and I think nothing has been done about it. So - I think humanity, unfortunately, won't do anything until there's a big shock. That's how humans move. Humans don't move until they have to move. In fact I'm sure evolution prefers organisms like that. So our brain is architectured to not do anything until there's a mortal threat to us. So I think there will be a mortal threat. I think it will come to the point where there are designer germs, where maybe an atomic bomb escapes, where the ice poles, the polar ice caps begin to melt and crack apart. I think it will take serious emergencies for the average person to wake up. Which is very sad but that is probably why in outer space there are probably be a lot of type zeros that never made it to type one. There are probably a lot of dead planets where atomic bombs did go out. Their atmospheres are radioactive. Their atmospheres are very hot and there's no life there anymore. Type zeros are probably fairly common. Type ones are probably rare. Type zeros are fairly common. So that's a lesson. If we want to be able to become type three, then we have to make sure that we don't budge it.

ST: So we should absolutely not be arrogant in any way.

MK: I guess that we should be humble throughout these things.
----

So far the 2003 Interview. I myself have always said: a technology too dangerous to fail is too dangerous too exist. The fallouts, quite literally, from the Fukushima incident may blow every human scale and imagination. Six tons of Plutonium in reactor 4 - it takes only 0.015 tons to build a nuclear bomb. It takes only a single Plutonium Atom to cause cancer. I feel reminded of the old couple in the 80s animated movie "Wherever the wind blows." They survived a nuclear war but could not comprehend what it meant, radioactive isotopes in the water, the air, and accumulating and magnifying along the food chain and therefore in themselves. Can we? Do we generally understand that each and everyone of us is a part of the global food chain, a part of the global flows of matter and energy? And the North Pacific is the World's major fishing ground...

 

http://thiesen.webnode.com/

Stefan Thiesen is a Germany, UK and USA educated earth and space scientist and science writer. He is an expert in marine science, climatology and planetary sciences, author of several popular science books in German and English as well as a novel (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Michio Kaku: "We live in a Bubble" - eerily familiar excerpts from an older interview

Bycatch - or Searching an Ethics for the Oceans

Standard & Poors: Tiny Private Company threatens World's 4th largest Economy

A War Against Money?

Black Rain and the Wrath of God: a call to think and feel

Anger, Sadness and Shame: Where are the Prophets and Visionaries?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I often wonder why people arrive at very different... by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:09:04 AM
I think it depends on whether they're on televisio... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:15:10 AM
Opposite here regarding Kaku: I never saw him on T... by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:43:20 AM
I just don't like scientists much, Stefan. They re... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:09:52 AM
No doubt you've seen the old home movies of Hitler... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:16:54 AM
So Ned Luddite doesn't like me, because I am a sci... by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:19:40 PM
No, actually I like you okay, Stefan. Just as one ... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:22:22 PM
Ned - I have to admit that liking a Nazi is someth... by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:47:00 PM
I think that if a scientist can show likeable qual... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:20:50 PM
I am not overly fond of your Nazi comparison, but ... by Stefan Thiesen on Friday, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:10:24 AM
And corporations are ruled by greed. There are no ... by Ned Lud on Friday, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:16:50 AM
Pinicillin was a good substance at its discovery, ... by Mel Smith on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:54:04 PM
Your entry here is a good example why the scientif... by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:55:59 PM
The FDA has a long history of favoring the for-pro... by Dawn Owens on Friday, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:25:03 PM
Dawn - no, I don't have to keep an open mind to pe... by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:31:22 AM