There are two primary ways in which we see ourselves governed. Those two primary ways are the Top -- Down Model, which is exemplified by the pyramid. In this view, God sits on high in His castle while gazing down upon us poor laboring Peasants below. (Sound a bit like Feudalism to you?)
Then there is the bottom up approach. The bottom-up approach is reflected in the following excerpt from Lovelock's "Gaia Hypothesis:"
Gaian hypotheses suggest that organisms co-evolve with their environment: that is, they "influence their abiotic environment, and that environment in turn influences the biota by Darwinian process. Lovelock (1995) gave evidence of this in his second book, showing the evolution from the world of the early thermo-acido-philic and methanogenic bacteria towards the oxygen-enriched atmosphere today that supports more complex life.
The question becomes: Was there a top-down manager, a God that was "in charge" of everything or is it that the Way of Nature is intelligent? This debate is also inherent in the notion of God being more verb (bottom- up with everything being creative in defining creation) than noun (top-down, authority rules, noun on noun).
If God is more verb or process, then is there as much a need for a hierarchy?
To further reinforce bottom-up, there is also the holographic notion of the universe in accord to the quantum physics of David Bohm. Within this model, all things exist in relationship to everything while everything mirrors the whole.
For example, if we were to take a super microscope and go into the little finger of your left hand, you would find that at the highest magnification the atoms and molecules in your body exist in relationship to empty space in the same proportion as stars existing in relationship to intergalactic space.
Gaze up at a starlight night sky, and you are seeing a mirror image of yourself. As the mystic Christians say, "as above, so below."
This relational view of the world works in 2 primary ways. The first is that everything is here to balance everything else. Thus, the lioness eats the gazelle and the gazelle is generally a herding animal that multiplies rapidly. The lioness's job is to help to "weed down" the population of gazelle's, which then reduces the amount of damage to the grasslands.
This relationship is a "win-win" proposition for both lion and gazelle (the species, not the individual. Of course sick gazelle's are an easier catch so hunting does help to diminish that stressor on a herd of gazelles).
Perhaps intelligence is a loaded word. I generally say, "The world works well and has evolved just fine without us hairless monkeys." A working world is my definition of a world that's intelligent. Even without us balding apes, Gaia will do quite well.
Yes, I am not saying we are the cat's "meow" on this planet. Indeed, Nature may just clean up the mess we've made and move on with evolving other creatures." So, on one ear of Nature, creatures are saying, "ma, would you please get rid of these guys?" On another ear, they are saying, "oh, just let them alone, they'll get it. We are all evolving, aren't we?"
Perhaps "not" is the answer to that question for us humans. In fact, it has been hypothesized that the Bible's fall (Genesis 2) was the beginning to the end of human evolution. Yes, yes, yes, we have jet planes and cars that zoom about. But, how have we evolved? Planes don't impress me. If we grew wings, then I'd be impressed.
Oh, but science knows so much now that our ignorant ancestors didn't know. So then you have a guy with a PhD writing a book like The Tao of Physics? That was recent. It was in the 1980's for goodness sake. The Tao was written when? Long before Christ if I'm not mistaken.
Sorry folks, life is not black and white. Science and her findings are NOT necessarily pitted against religion. The traditional religions we are used to in the West may be in question. And, they should be for many of the western churches are very much caught up in Greco-Roman rationalism. Indeed, I would say Christians in many cases have become the Roman Empire. (By the way, Nero's number was '666' which instituted the number being assigned to the anti-Christ. Hey, if someone put my wife, child or best friend into a lion's den, anti-Christ would be an extremely mild label that I would give them).