Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 16, 2009 at 08:14:33

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 6/16/09:

McGovern: Reporter Made It Up, I'm Voting NO on War $

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By David Swanson (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: David Swanson - Writer

I just spoke with Keith Stern, communications director for Congressman Jim McGovern and asked him whether the report in Congress Now yesterday was true, that McGovern, who has been one of the most reliable members of Congress in opposing wars, would now be voting Yes on the war money.

Stern said: "That is absolutely untrue.  We are trying to correct it.  He is a No vote.  We are asbsolutely livid about that.  It could not be further from the truth.  Frankly, the reporter just made it up.  Congressman McGovern is a hard No vote and he will be voting No on the supplemental."

This is good news.  But some bad news remains.  McGovern favors ending the wars in the way wars are ended, by ceasing to fund them.  But he also has a bill that reads in its entirety:


"Not later than December 31, 2009, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report outlining the United States exit strategy for United States military forces in Afghanistan participating in Operation Enduring Freedom."


And we have already heard of at least one Congress member using cosponsorship of that bill as an excuse for voting Yes on the war supplemental.  

Moveon.org and other large organizations let it be known on Monday that they planned to encourage their members on Tuesday to urge Congress members to sign onto McGovern's bill -- without saying one word about the war supplemental expected to be voted on that same day.

The exit strategy to satisfy McGovern's well-intended bill could consist of a plan to redeploy troops to Iran in 2015.  It could be anything.  And MoveOn's timing, together with other organizations in the Win Without War coalition, was telling.  Because many members of these groups oppose the war and have complained about their organizations' silence on the supplemental vote, the organizations' leaders chose the moment of the war vote to propose something else that might at least look like a halfway step.  In reality, however, it may turn out to be counterproductive -- a development that would please Pelosi and Emanuel.  

Thus would an exit strategy succeed in keeping wars going.  

UPDATE: The coalition push for cosponsors of McGovern's bill for an exit strategy has been put off until the supplemental fight is over, in order to avoid allowing cosponsorship of that bill to be widely used as an excuse for voting yes on the war money.  This is the right move and to be applauded.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
NO to War Supplemental

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

David Swanson is the author of the upcoming book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union" by Seven Stories Press and of the introduction to "The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum