Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 10, 2009 at 16:06:21

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/10/09:

Max Baucus Should Not Be Deciding Health Care for America

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Kevin Zeese (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Kevin Zeese - Writer

The “Senator for K Street” is Putting Campaign Donor Profits Ahead of the Basic Needs of the People

Senator Max Baucus and the Senate Finance Committee are too corrupted by corporate health industry profiteers donations to give America the health care policy it needs. 

Health care is 15% of the U.S. gross domestic product. Health care costs have been rising rapidly for several years. U.S. health care expenditures surpassed $2.4 trillion in 2007, more than three times the $714 billion spent in 1990. The cost of health care is projected to reach $4.4 trillion by 2018. There is a lot of room for corporate profiteering in the increasing cost of health care.  So, the millions the health care industry has invested in Baucus and the Senate Finance Committee could turn out to be a very profitable one.

It is evident that any bill that comes out of the Senate Finance Committee will be a pro-industry bill that will ensure trillions in profits for the health insurance industry, HMO’s and pharmaceutical industry.

Baucus has held two hearings so far and has refused to allow advocates for the most popular reform – a single payer national health policy – to even testify.  Single payer, improved Medicare for all, is favored by more than 60% of Americans as well as majorities of doctors, nurses and economists.  It is the most cost-effective and efficient way to provide health care to all Americans from cradle to grave.

Why aren’t single payer advocates allowed to testify before Baucus’ committee?  Follow the money. Campaign donations explain why and demonstrate that the Senate Finance Committee should not be in charge of health care.  Senator Reid should remove the health care reform bill from Baucus and start all over before the Health Committee in the senate.

Here’s why Baucus is not doing the peoples business:

According to OpenSecrets.org over his career he has taken donations from:

The Insurance Industry:  $1,170,313

Health Professionals  $1,016,276

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products Industry $734,605

Hospitals/Nursing Homes  $541,891

Health Services/HMOs  $439,700

That is a grand total of $3,902,785.  Can we trust Baucus to put aside the profits of the industries that have kept him in the senate?  Will he put the people’s necessities ahead of the profits of his contributors?  Baucus has shown his bias and should be removed from leading the health care reform effort by the Democratic Party leadership.

In 2008 Baucus had virtually no challenger in Montana.  A little-known Republican was on the ballot, Baucus won with 73% of the vote.  But, Baucus sought big donations from big business anyway.  He used his connections to corporations with business before his committee to raise an immense campaign fund of more than $11 million. In 2008, 91% of his donations come from individuals living outside of Montana, which is why he is more the “Senator for K Street” then the Senator for Montana.  Corporate health profiteers who invested in Baucus will now benefit from his stewardship over health care reform.  His 2008 donations from health care profiteers included:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kevin Zeese is Executive Director of the Campaign for Fresh Air and Clean Politics (www.FreshAirCleanPolitics.net) whose projects include Voters for Peace (www.VotersForPeace.US., Prosperity Agenda (www.ProsperityAgenda.US), True Vote (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Baucus Max"
Senator Max Baucus: Making a difference in rural America.: An article from: Rural Telecommunications
by Aaryn Slafky

$5.95

Number of pages: 5
Publisher: National Telephone Cooperative Association

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Baucus- the fox in the hen house. by Caronome on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 12:37:01 AM
Reform is Needed by UncleSim on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 2:06:37 PM
If You Can't Beat Them Join Them by Jason Paz on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 3:07:42 AM
more coming by liberalsrock on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 9:34:52 AM
>< by Tanya Stadniuk on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 11:39:34 AM
Kevin and All by Michael Cavlan on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 1:45:54 PM
Just Baucus? by UncleSim on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 1:43:29 PM
BTW by Michael Cavlan on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 1:49:25 PM
You mean golden handcuffs? by Cinderfella on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 2:34:59 PM
Damned good idea by Dave Kisor on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 10:55:41 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum