Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Mastectomies, Movie Stars, Media and Medicine

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 5/27/13

How ironic that Angelina Jolie chose National Women's Health Week - and the week after Barbara Brenner, executive director of Breast Cancer Action and a feisty advocate for women with the disease died (from Lou Gehrig's Disease) - to share with the world that she had elected to have a double mastectomy in an effort to avoid breast cancer.

The press lit up with the news.   Breast cancer "experts" and media moguls leapt at the chance to say Jolie had been "brave," and "courageous," and indeed she had:   Choosing to have your healthy breasts amputated at the age of 37 takes guts and must have been a heart wrenching decision to make.   In her case, it is understandable.   Having an estimated 87 percent chance of contracting a potentially fatal disease is enough to make any woman think twice about whether prophylactic mastectomy is warranted. (I still wonder how that precise percentage was derived.)

Still, a chill ran down my spine when I heard the news and I wondered what Barbara Brenner, an outspoken breast cancer educator who had had breast cancer herself, would have said.   Here's why.

Only about one percent of American women carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation that Jolie's doctors identified.   Therefore, as H. Gilbert Welch, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice pointed out in a CNN commentary, her story "is not relevant to more than 99 percent of women [here]."   Although it's a terrible thing to carry the gene, it affects relatively few women. Yet, now that Jolie has gone public, even more women will be seeking mastectomies, adding to an alarming increase in demands for the surgery ever since Sherly Crow, Marlee Matlin, and Miss America contestant Allyn Rose made the same choice or heartily endorsed it.

Mastectomy and all that it entails is not something to be taken lightly.   As with other major surgeries, it can result in serious complications, along with persistent pain and limited mobility.   Repeat surgeries may be necessary, especially if a woman chooses to have breast implants.   If tissue is transplanted from other parts of the body to reconstruct the breasts, more incisions will be needed, and if muscle is removed for this purpose, long-term weakness can result.    As one advocate put it, "it is not a breeze" and not a cure-all.

It is also an expensive proposition, as is the testing for BRCA 1 and 2.   It costs about $3,000 dollars to be tested and many thousands of dollars to have elective surgery.   Some insurance companies cover some of the costs, but many don't.   That's okay if you're a movie star, but ordinary women, including many women of color, will never be able to afford treatment close to what Angelina Jolie has just experienced.   And even she still has a chance, reduced though it may be, to getting breast cancer.

In The New York Times op ed. revealing her surgery, Jolie said "cancer is still a word that strikes fear into people's hearts."   How many women's decisions around prophylactic mastectomy are based on fear-mongering rather than evidence-based decision-making?   Was it responsible for Jolie to remind readers that "breast cancer alone kills some 458,000 people each year," without also providing the stats on the gene she carries?

Many women are choosing mastectomy -- even for healthy breasts -- when advances in early detection and subsequent treatment, including lumpectomy, offer viable alternatives. Joan Walsh of Salon.com made this case, based on her own personal experience.   "I chose a course of rigorous medical follow-up," she posted, "[including] an annual screening mammography and twice-yearly breast exams by a surgeon."   Walsh elected not to be tested for the BRCA gene, instead giving emergency attention to the slightest anomaly. "I'm so glad I didn't listen to the doctor who wanted to treat my breasts like "ticking time bombs,'" she says. As respected breast surgeon Dr. Susan Love noted in The New York Times, "When you have to cut off normal body parts to prevent a disease, that's really pretty barbaric when you think about it."

The risks and benefits of any breast surgery, and especially mastectomy, vary from woman to woman. As Dr. Isabelle Bedrosian, a surgical oncologist at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston put it in a New York Times report, "There is an upside to [Jolie's] story and that is that women will hopefully be more curious about their family history. [But] we need to be careful that one message doesn't apply to all. Angelina's situation is very unique. People should not be quick to say "I should do like she did,' because you may not be like her."  

Fortunately, few of us are. That should be the starting point if we are ever faced with a decision about breast cancer treatment options, even if that decision proves to be as difficult as the one Angelina Jolie made

 

www.elayneclift.com

Elayne Clift is a writer,lecturer, workshop leader and activist. She is senior correspondent for Women's Feature Service, columnist for the Keene (NH) Sentinel and Brattleboro (VT) Commons and a contributor to various publications internationally. (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Happens When "Jane" Comes Marching Home Again?

Orifice Politics; What the War on Women is Really About

Why Are We Sexualizing Young Girls?

Beauty and the Beast: The Ugly Attacks on Activist Women

DSM-5 Could Be Hazardous to Your Mental Health

Is America Really as Safe a Place to Live as You Thought?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What impact will Angelina Jolie's decision have on... by Elayne Clift on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 3:13:29 PM
Thank you for this. I also think it's important to... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 4:40:32 PM
Yes, important to make that clear - especially if ... by Elayne Clift on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 10:49:01 PM
The Trophoblastic Theory of Cancer (The body try... by Theresa Paulfranz on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 12:24:45 PM