Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 10/9/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

Making Sense of Syria

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (162 fans)   -- Page 1 of 6 page(s)

opednews.com

Making Sense of Syria - by Stephen Lendman

Washington, Israel, Britain and France want regime change in Syria.

Last March, Syria's externally generated uprisings began. Despite legitimate grievances, Washington orchestrated change there like elsewhere in the region. 

It's part of its imperial "New Middle East" project to control North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia to Russia's borders.

For over a decade, regime change plans targeted Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Syria, and other countries outside the region.

Libya's model is the template for future Washington aggression. Whether it's employed in Syria remains to be seen.

So far, heavily armed insurgents entered from regional countries. Anti-government demonstrations have been disruptive and violent. Trapped between warring sides, civilian casualties keep mounting. 

Washington and other Western nations blame Syria. Its security forces, in fact, confronted an armed insurrection. Conflict keeps raging unresolved.

Russia and China blocked America's (Western supported) Security Council resolution. If passed, it  would have been a first against Syria, perhaps opening the way for greater conflict or war like against Libya. 

Despite watered down language, both countries opposed options, including the UN Charter's Article 41 provisions, stating:

"The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decision, and it may call upon (UN members) to apply such measures." 

"These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations."

In other words, stiff sanctions harming Syria's weakened economy further might topple it. 

On October 4, New York Times writer Neil MacFarquhar headlined, "UN Resolution on Syria Blocked by Russia and China," saying:

"Nine nations, including the United States and its Western allies voted for the measure, while Brazil, India, South Africa and Lebanon abstained."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Truth and Falsehood In Syria by Chris Cook on Sunday, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:31:45 AM
Here We Go Again by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:52:50 AM
I hope you read the Salt article. by Christopher Rushlau on Sunday, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:51:58 PM
Nir Rosen reporting on/from Syria for Al Jazeera today by Christopher Rushlau on Monday, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:22:24 PM