Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  5
Share on Facebook
  5
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit
  1
Share on StumbleUpon
  193
Tell A Friend 204 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
1 comment

General News

Lynching Adegbile

Become a Fan
  (25 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Inspiring 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 3/18/14

opednews.com

Democrats Join Republicans in High-Tech Lynching of Black Nominee

By William Boardman -- Reader Supported News         


Nominee Adegbile on Sesame Street by [levittownnow.com]
 

Seven Democratic dwarves prefer police state veto to due process of law

When the United States Senate voted against the United States Constitution on March 5, 2014, the anti-constitutional majority included, as expected, all the Republican Senators voting, but also, more unexpectedly, seven principle-free Democrats. 

The majority vote represents an affirmation of imaginary guilt by association, with deep racial overtones, in what amounted to a Senatorial lynching of an attorney who dared participate in the constitutionally-mandated legal defense of a pre-judged black man long since found guilty and still in prison after thirty years.  These Senators were less persuaded the Supreme Court's finding of a flawed trial than by the orchestrated baying by white vigilantes whose police state mentality allows no nuance when they want someone dead no matter what. 

The Senate vote in question on March 5 was whether to end a Republican filibuster against President Obama's nominee to serve as the United States Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice -- attorney Debo Adegbile, 48, who is currently senior counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee.  A native New Yorker, he was born Adebowale Patrick Akande Adegbile (his father Nigerian, his mother Irish) and raised by his single mother. As a child he was an actor on Sesame Street for nine years. He earned his law degree from New York University law school in 1994. 

After seven years in private practice at the N.Y. law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, & Garrison, Adegbile joined the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund where he was a respected litigator from 2001 to 2013. He argued his first Supreme Court case in 2009, defending the Voting Rights Act. His career path, without the major cases, is similar to that of the late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, but only up to this point.  

Republicans opposing Adegbile are vehement, adamant, and dishonest in their opposition, rooted in passion and prejudice. Their critique does not challenge Adegbile's competence or qualifications to be in charge of the Civil Rights Division, which currently has an acting head. Arguing Adegbile's nomination on its merits is not something Republicans even tried to do. Their "case" against Adegbile was an ugly, demagogic stew of partisanship, race baiting, and irrelevance worthy of the late Senator Joe McCarthy at his worst. 

"I stand with the Fraternal Order of Police in opposition to Debo Adegbile". we all should agree that those who go out of their way to celebrate, to lionize, convicted cop killers are not suitable for major leadership roles at the Department of Justice. Under Adegbile's supervision, LDF lawyers fanned the flames of racial tension through rallies and protests and a media campaign all to portray Mumia Abu-Jamal, an unrepentant cop killer, as a political prisoner."

-- Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, on the Senate floor, March 4, 2014 

In this brief statement, Cruz manages to:

1. Defend what amounts to a police lobby veto over presidential appointments to the Justice Dept;  

2.    Lie about Adegbile's activities (no evidence to support Cruz's smear);

3.    Invent "lionization" of the man at the center of a case that is genuinely about due process and the death penalty, a case that has been found wanting by the Supreme Court;

4.    Pretend that racial tensions have not been present in this case since the moment it started (the trial judge promised "I'm going to help them fry the n-word," and a higher judge found the comment not prejudicial);

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Agreed. This was a clear case of politics above pr... by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:56:37 PM