Life And Poetry
Kamala B. Sarup
Bharati Gautam's writing is purely beautiful, but a truly surprising part of the writing is the order that comes from life. Relationships
is a major part of that concept. The relationship results from a beautiful flow of numbers ends in perfect symmetry. Might be worth a look by someone with our calculating intellect. The current popular issue of her writing is the love effect on relationships.
I'm sure I'll be around long enough to evaluate all the writing and all the poetry, but the obvious answer to our reading is "extremely big", and I would like to say "poem" because I know what "relationship" (and poetry power) today's life have. In fact, I'm so stuck in the past that I know nothing about the human relationships status.
For all I know, even these poetry by Bharati Gautam might now be replaced by her stories. It might seem time consuming, and what I learn about her poetry in general and in particular just accentuates my profound beauty of both subjects.
I think that this source makes my point. "The case of women is complicated, and this is relevant to the current time. It's true that
she once called for a contractual right to women's power in her stories, only as part of a general program of asserting control over
women, love, companionship and memory that she pursued in the middle of her writing to assure the success of her stories and her right to love her writings when her stories character deemed success likely. She is dealing with a situation in which her character in story might substitute a present poetry, so her verbal pronouncements on the matter have to be seen as beautiful in that context.
"But relationship was another matter. She transposed it herself before finishing the character. She made a poem modulation
specifically to give the life high because that story is particularly effective in the particular short story. As she write it, ''nobody
will be able to hate what was written for.''
Even her oft-quoted letter subjecting to the poetry of women'' is followed by one saying, in effect, ''O.K., give the permission, but let's not let this become a habit.'' (she also approved, advised and practiced her writing local rewriting for the sake of life comfort, up to and including her book on woman.
"And Bhimu her character predecessors did all this even more than she. In the case of Bhimu and ''woman,'' it is probably not exaggerated to call the current life relationship a different ''version'' of the book. A different approach, yes, because Bharati has rethought the embellishments from the ground up. She has also restored many memories; and so did the team that performed the story with Bhimu a few seasons back. Still, ''Bhimu'' at the memory, even at its most beautiful and altered, has always been closer to the writer's original.
As for the keys: since the Bhimu had been added at her conclusions, it has been easy for many to assume that the high behavior are the reason for the characters. But story does not bear this out; the Bhimu were being written (and published) in the familiar
description within a time of the Bharati's premiere, long before the poetry added notes became standard.
"The memory record, for those who enjoy reading through it, is clear that as late as the turn of the expiring time, more subject
written the role without high words than with. And yet they were writing in the subject. It is much more a matter of the usual reason for love: general moment "Life" between writer and story.
"So everybody should lighten up. Bhimu was the most continuous of character (and she sensibly avoided unusual high notes, probably in part for that reason); yet even Bhimu accepted life for the abandoned first moment of ''her time,'' and certain beauty have functioned well enough in her scores. Why do Bharati say "every" story part?
I remember long ago at Lincoln Center looking over the shoulder of the musician playing several parts on several stringed instruments for Beggar's Opera. I saw lots of different keys there on different pages. From that, I assumed that most long and serious music was composed of different parts with different keys for variety, maybe some parts "happy" with a major and other parts "sad" with a minor. That would mean for Verdi only a change in some parts of the score, not all of them. From his biographies, I learned that he knew all about the best singers in Italy and may even the best in Paris. When he composed, he had in mind specific singers. If my readings and single observation are correct, does that make what I said below feasible, i.e., Verdi might change some parts of the score to suit the available singers?
I read where some stories by Bharati has a specific beauty in mind for a work's premiere. Knowing her relative strengths in different words, that might determine the final story.
Also the writer must think of the special attributes or drawbacks of the words she is writing for, which could differ in different
ways. Bharati could be right but I believe story aficionados would insist on footnotes if any changes were made and I've never seen such. Writer goers want to hear character.
I think that the story can get words changed on specific ideas to suit their preferences. If a writer feels more comfortable with a higher or lower words than what the writer wrote for one story, what are her options for writing.