Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Liberals Cry Out: Tax the Rich! Fund More Wars!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 4/10/12
Become a Fan
  (113 fans)

opednews.com

The shout of the Occupy movement, at least in D.C., has been "End the Wars, Tax the Rich!" in that order and in combination.  Over half of federal discretionary spending goes to the war machine.  We ought to fix that problem first, and then fix the problem that our overlords aren't actually paying their fair share of the taxes.  My friend Leah Bolger is about to face a possible sentence of months in prison for having taken this message to the Super Committee.  Remember them?

But the big, well-funded liberal/progressive groups that are borrowing the language of Occupy and organizing 99% Spring nonviolence trainings are talking about taxing the rich, never mind what the taxes are spent on.  I just spoke with someone organizing a bunch of "patriotic millionaires" to come to Washington, D.C., and talk about how they'd like to be taxed more.  I suggested that they might also comment on what their money should go to, and I was told that saying more than one simple thing was bad messaging policy.

Really?  How about if it rhymes?  How do we fix the deficit / End the wars and tax the rich!  When we chant that, random people join in marches.  Are we sure it's bad messaging policy?  Has that been focus grouped?

The annual Take Back the American Dream conference actually had a panel on war last year.  I was on it.  But it was far from the focus.  Here's the event's current "messaging" about its conference this coming summer:

"At this conference, we'll be tackling some of the most pressing questions we face today:

 "How do we compel candidates to embrace a jobs agenda big enough to end our economic crisis?

 "How can we stop unlimited corporate campaign cash from buying this election?

 "How many progressive champions can we help win in congressional, state and local races?

 "How will we take back our democracy--to Take Back the American Dream?"

In fairness there's nothing there about taxing the rich either.  But there's certainly no mention of military spending or war.  Perhaps when the full agenda is announced I'll be pleasantly surprised , as I was last year. 

Another upcoming "progressive" conference has just published its full schedule of panels and workshops.  This one is called Netroots Nation.  In recent years, I've always complained that they had nothing on war.  They've always responded that I ought to have proposed a panel on the topic.  I've always pointed out that I did in fact do so.  I did so this year as well, just as I did for Left Forum and UNAC and other conferences that said Yes and included them.  Among the dozens and dozens of panels announced by Netroots Nation, none focuses on cutting military spending, a fact that never ceases to amaze me, as pinching a bit from the military could pay for everything else progressives want.  There are a few panels that touch on war, one of which even mentions the Pentagon budget in passing:

"Decoding Defense: Speaking with Authority on National Security Issues

"It's an old cliche: The GOP is the 'national security' party. But Barack Obama's foreign and domestic policies are changing that idea. The armed services have played a key role in debates over foreign policy, the budget, gay rights, immigration and civil liberties. Vets transitioning to the homefront have taken the lead in the Occupy movement, the push for clean energy and reforms to education. Speaking with authority on military issues is critical for progressives in the coming year, but it's also daunting. How do you navigate a Pentagon budget? What's the difference between a commissioned and noncommissioned officer? Who watchdogs military contractors? What organizations exist to connect progressives and vets? Attendees to this workshop will learn how to 'speak DOD,' find and decipher important military info, articulate progressive national security goals in simple statements, rebut conservative talking points and reach out with empathy to veterans who are receptive to progressive ideals.

"Panelists: Bryan Rahija, Adam Weinstein."

Hmm.  The goal here seems to be making the Democratic Party the party of militarism.  If that's not entirely clear from the above description, check out this one for another Netroots Nation panel:

"Intervention, Isolation and the Future of Progressive Security Policy

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://davidswanson.org

David Swanson is the author of "When the World Outlawed War," "War Is A Lie" and "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union." He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org and works for the online (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Feith Dares Obama to Enforce the Law

Obama's Open Forum Opens Possibilities

Public Forum Planned on Vermont Proposal to Arrest Bush and Cheney

Did Bush Sr. Kill Kennedy and Frame Nixon?

Holder Asked to Prosecute Blankenship

Eleven Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is shocking and disheartening that any serious ... by John Rachel on Tuesday, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:05:53 PM
Back in 2003 when I became an officer in my local ... by Bill Habedank on Wednesday, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:01:10 PM