OpEdNews Op Eds

Lawless NYPD Spying on Muslims

By       Message Stephen Lendman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 194
Become a Fan
  (191 fans)
- Advertisement -

Lawless NYPD Spying on Muslims

by Stephen Lendman

America's war on Islam

Post-9/11, America declared war on Islam. Muslims became public enemy number one. They're stereotypically portrayed as culturally inferior, dirty, lecherous, untrustworthy, religiously fanatical and violent.

Doing so turns truth on its head. It also violates the Constitution's First Amendment. It guarantees religious freedom. It means free from persecution. 

It's rhetoric, not policy. Muslims are scapegoated for political advantage. 

They're unjustly targeted and persecuted. What Bush began, Obama continues. His policies trickle down to local communities. Washington works cooperatively with them. It's official policy. Homeland Security plays a leading role. 

On March 4, New York Times editors portrayed things both ways. Their editorial headlined "Surveillance, Security and Civil Liberties." 

- Advertisement -

It said Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly acted responsibly. They "wisely decided to beef up the Police Department's counterterrorism program significantly."

They did so despite no terrorism threat. Times editors suggested one existed then and now. Washington's only enemies are ones it invents.

American Muslims "paid a real price".Unearthed police records noticeably lack any apparent link to suspected criminal activity, or any obvious payoff for public safety."

For months, Times editors said nothing. Responding days ago was too little too late. Doing it irresponsibly matters most.

- Advertisement -

Muslims were targeted despite no evidence of wrongdoing. Mistreating them doesn't arouse "nearly the protest that it should." Where were Times editors when it mattered? Silence endorsed official policy.

Bloomberg calls NYPD activity "legal," "appropriate," and "constitutional." Police "follow(ed) leads," he said. How could they when none existed? 

Pretexts are invented. Lawless operations follow. Unaccountability reflects it. Kelly vows to keep spying. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

View Ratings | Rate It

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert