Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

La Guerre en Rose

By       Message Pepe Escobar     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/20/15

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (160 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Sputnik

From youtube.com/watch?v=usYQoNUjtso: Paris tragedy
Paris tragedy
(image by vinal vladislav)
  License   DMCA


"It's war." French President Francois Hollande in 2015 did echo George W. Bush in 2001. France has now entered its own "war on terra," complete with mini-Patriot Act ("etat d'urgence") against ISIS/ISIL/Daesh.

Exit la vie en rose. Enter la guerre en rose. And the war, in Hollande's definition, will be "merciless."

It took a carnage for the French political establishment to be hurled away from its splendid torpor. Until 11/13 -- Paris tragedy day -- for the Elysee palace Bashar al-Assad equaled Daesh. As much as Petro Poroshenko in Ukraine was the good guy fighting "Russian aggression."

In fact "Russian aggression" ended up being aggressed -- via the FSB-established bombing of the Metrojet A321 -- even before the suicide bombing/shooting spree in Paris.

- Advertisement -

"Russian aggression" had already launched a serious offensive against Daesh, as part of the "4+1" coalition (Russia, Syria, Iran, Iraq plus Hezbollah). France, for its part, was lobbing the odd, disinterested strike as part of a US-led, and remarkably inefficient, coalition featuring, among others, Salafi-jihadi enablers/financiers/weaponizers Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The Paris carnage did change everything. At the G-20 in Antalya, during a by now iconic 35 minutes face-to-face with President Putin, President Obama finally seemed to have gotten the message; yes, there will be war. But the enemy is not "Russian aggression"; it's Daesh.

No sleep till Raqqa

Martial France is now all huff and puff. Jean-Yves Le Drian, France's Defense Minister, "has just invoked Article 42.7," as he tweeted from Brussels. What he meant is that he formally requested help from France's EU partners. According to the Lisbon Treaty, in case of "armed aggression," EU nations have "an obligation of aid and assistance by all means in their power."

This is the first time ever this article in the EU treaty has been invoked.

- Advertisement -

So the "armed aggression" is from Daesh; a non-state actor posing as a "Caliphate" with a return address in Raqqa, eastern Syria, the "Caliphate" capital.

Even before requesting EU help, France was already bombing Raqqa, following what Russia had been doing for weeks. Now the geopolitical plat du jour is to bomb Raqqa. International law experts will cringe about the legality of it all -- considering that Russian Air Force strikes at least were formally authorized by Damascus.

Euphemistically, France wants "increased military participation" from other EU nations in selected "operational theatres." In Brussels newspeak, this means bombing the hell out of Daesh anywhere in "Syraq."

As the logic of war is already on, the next step would be for France to invoke NATO's Article 5 -- which stipulates that an "armed aggression" against one ally applies to all allies; thus their right to wage war as "self-defense," under the UN charter.

Article 5 has been invoked only once; by the US after 9/11.

The Pentagon, which runs NATO, is cryptically enthusiastic. Pentagon head Ash Carter has let it slip, "We're looking to do more, we're looking for every opportunity we can to get in there and go at [Daesh], but we need others to" get in the game as well."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?