Known Liars Saying "Trust Us" is Not Proof

On May 1st the American people were told that Osama  Bin Laden had been killed and that his body was conveniently lying at the bottom of the ocean.  The "burial at sea" was described as being in line Islamic tradition, though ABC News has admitted that such a custom is not part of Islamic tradition, and it has not been explained why a U.S. government that tortures Muslims and throws them into black holes for years without trial would suddenly care about the religious dignity of their supposed number one enemy. 

Given the fact that the U.S. government has admittedly lied numerous times to its people when it comes to war (and just about everything else), it would seem that a legitimate killing of Osama Bin Laden on May 1st, 2011 would yield an offering of conclusive proof to the people that the deed was done just as the uniforms say it was.  As more people now question the official story of 9/11,  offering the body up for an independent investigation outside the government's clutches would have been an easy way to alleviate any "conspiracy theories" regarding Bin Laden's real fate.  In the days of Photoshop and special effects, politicians and military men offering pictures (which at the time of this writing they're debating whether or not they'll even show (new ones, not the fake one that's already been put out and debunked) and "DNA" evidence (which could have been taken at any time in the past) without outside verification means nothing.  To believe that the globalist mafia behind Bush and now Obama has earned the benefit of the doubt is as laughable as the notion that fire brought down this building:

The question isn't so much whether or not Bin Laden is still alive, as many smarmy pundits on TV indicate when doing their pre-emptive strike on "conspiracy theorists", knowing that the government would be called out for its quick destruction of evidence.  In all likelihood Bin Laden died years ago, his memory kept alive only by a vast media/government propaganda machine using the illusion of his continued existence as a fear generator for a 9/11 psyoped public.    Rather the question is whether or not this was a fake "Wag the Dog" event designed to boost the popularity of an increasingly unpopular president before an election, and/or to bring closure to the "War on Terror" narrative so that the U.S. can move onto the next stage of a larger global empire plan. 

The U.S. government has not proven anything happened on May 1st other than a building burned down in Pakistan.  Right from the moment the story broke the media cogs aligned perfectly to control the narrative and send the message to the viewer that everyone  believes the boogeyman died that day, and that if you question the lie then you're alone.  Bloodthirsty Americans have been shown doing their real life "Two Minute Hate", celebrating as if it's VJ Day (despite the fact that war hasn't ended) while critical analysis has been brushed aside. 

In reality, those questioning this obvious hoax are not alone.  News stories on the net that allow comments are filled with those calling the U.S. government on its lie.  This is a time for truth tellers not to retreat but to step forward and shove their collective finger into the U.S.  government's face. 

Known liars saying "trust us" is not proof.  Even if some people have been brainwashed, many more are beginning to smell a rat.   Instead of bringing closure to the 9/11 false flag event Obama has blown open a new can of worms with his dismissive conclusion to the Bin Laden death story, and the starkly apparent timing of it.  If the powers that be believe that this will put to rest the controversy surrounding 9/11, they have another thing coming.  No doubt, if such an announcement had been made in the Soviet Union, we here in the West would have rolled our eyes and said, "yeah right".