Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Judge extends ban on Oklahoma anti-Islam amendment

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

A federal judge in Oklahoma has extended a restraining order barring certification of an anti-Islam state ballot measure (SQ 755) passed in the November 2 election.

If certified, the ballot measure (SQ 755) would have amended Oklahoma State's constitution to forbid judges from considering Islamic principles or international law when deciding a case.

Following a hearing Monday morning (Nov 22) in Oklahoma City, U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma ruled that the temporary restraining order she granted November 8 barring certification of the amendment by the Oklahoma State Board of Elections will remain in place until she makes a final decision as to whether it should be extended until the case against the measure SQ 755 is resolved.

The lawsuit seeking to block certification of SQ 755 was filed by Muneer Awad, executive director of Council on American-Islamic Relations, Oklahoma chapter (CAIR-OK). Awad argued that the amendment violated the freedom of religion clause of the United States Constitution, because it singled out Shariah law and Islam for special treatment rather than banning consideration of all religious codes. That amounts to state disapproval of Islam, he argued.

In Monday's hearing, Awad was represented by American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma Foundation attorney Michael Salem, with CAIR attorney Gadeir Abbas acting as co-counsel.

Awad's lawsuit says SQ 755 violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause that bars government bodies from making laws "respecting the establishment of religion." 

The ballot measure passed with 70 percent of the vote and helped drive record turnout in Republican strongholds. For the first time in the state, Republicans now control the governor's office and have veto-proof majorities in both houses of the Legislature.

The New York Times reports that law professors have begun to raise questions about the unintended consequences of the amendment. Because it also "forbids courts from using or considering international law," it could complicate contractual arrangements between Oklahoma companies and those with headquarters abroad. The amendment might also prevent judges from referring to the Ten Commandments or exploring English common law in their decisions.

"You throw a series of ambiguous ill-conceived words into the State Constitution and you don't know what will happen," Harry F. Tepker Jr., a law professor at the University of Oklahoma, was quoted by the New York Times as saying. "It's a mess."

Two other measures challenged

Oklahoma voters have also passed ballot initiatives on hot conservative issues. For instance, voters overwhelmingly approved measures (SQ 751) making English the state's official language and requiring picture identification at the polls (SQ 746). Both measures make it harder for Hispanic immigrants to vote or go to school.

As expected, lawsuits have been filed challenging both SQ 751 and SQ 746. Both were filed by James C. Thomas, a Tulsa attorney and a University of Tulsa professor, in Tulsa County District Courts. The "English only" measure, he says, violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution while the voter identification requirement is contrary to the state constitution's statement forbidding interference in the "free exercise of the right of suffrage."

Ballot measure 751 requires that all official state actions be conducted in English, with exceptions for Native American languages and in cases when federal law requires otherwise.

This whole issue was proposed over the issue of illegal immigration and it simply played into the anti-illegal immigration sentiment as the arguments and counter-arguments indicate.  

Supporters of measure 751 claimed that making English the official language would in fact build a better atmosphere in the state by eliminating language barriers, and as a result, creating a better way for state businesses to succeed.

State Representative George Faught has argued that it could save the state money by not having to translate and print forms in other languages. However, State Senator Jim Wilson, D, contends it would save the state only $1,200 -- the amount the Department of Public Safety pays to put out a limited number of Spanish editions of the driver's manual.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Author and journalist. Author of Islamic Pakistan: Illusions & Reality; Islam in the Post-Cold War Era; Islam & Modernism; Islam & Muslims in the Post-9/11 America. Currently working as free lance journalist. Executive Editor of American (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments