Tags for This Article:

Congress (636) Judiciary (286) Congress Oversight Failures (263) Dept Of Justice Attorney Firings (204) Subpoena (188) Immunity (184) Politicization (122) Congress Contempt Of (91) Congressional Hearings (84) Congressional Testimony (59) Privilege (31) Miers Harriet (19) Joshua Bolten (17) Harriet Miers (14) Bates (2) Stonewall (2)


Populum
Tag Cloud
Control Panel

Fine tune your search to access content

Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
August 27, 2008 at 21:48:19

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/27/08:
Judge Denies Stay for Miers and Bolten

by JC Garrett     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

U.S. District Judge John Bates handed the Bush administration another loss in its war on the Constitution and Congressional oversight yesterday when he denied a stay of his previous order that Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten appear before the House Judiciary Committee in compliance with Congressional subpoenas.

The Judge made clear that he views the administration's claims of absolute immunity from Congressional subpoenas as ridiculous and not even worthy of serious consideration, calling their arguments "weak."

He said the Executive has "failed to demonstrate that it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the absolute immunity issue" or that it has even raised a serious or substantial question that would warrant suspension of his previous order. He further stated that the "absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law."

Without any supporting judicial precedent whatsoever -- and, indeed, in the face of Supreme Court case law that effectively forecloses the basis for the assertion of absolute immunity here -- it is difficult to see how the Executive can demonstrate that it has a substantial likelihood of success on appeal, or even that a serious legal question is presented.

Bates ridiculed the government's lawyers and their legal reasoning, saying:

The Executive’s argument boils down to a claim that a stay is appropriate because the underlying issue is important. But that is beside the point and does not demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits. Simply calling an issue important -- primarily because it involves the relationship of the political branches -- does not transform the Executive’s weak arguments into a likelihood of success or a substantial appellate issue.

He said Miers and Bolten remain fully capable of asserting executive privilege on a question-by-question basis, and that "there is no risk whatsoever that any confidential or privileged information will be disclosed during the course of [their] testimony."

Furthermore, since they have been able to cite no case law that suggests that any individual is immune from compliance with Congressional subpoenas, and since "citizens have 'an unremitting obligation to respond to [congressional] subpoenas, to respect the dignity of the Congress and its committees and to testify fully with respect to matters within the province of proper investigation'," the Judge says the government's case really doesn't have any legs because the administration "likely has no appeal rights at this juncture to begin with."

The government had argued that a stay should be granted since the next Congress could still continue its investigation after President Bush leaves office. Judge Bates wasn't buyin'. He wrote:

[A]s this Court previously explained, it would be speculative at this juncture to predict how the incoming Congress and the new President will choose to proceed in this matter. What is near certain, however, is that granting a stay would deprive this Congress of the information it seeks. That rather plainly constitutes harm for purposes of this analysis.

Administration lawyers tried to blame Congress for taking so long to bring legal action against them. Again, the Judge slapped them down. He said the Committee had tried to negotiate a solution with Bush at every step along the way, and that "the Executive cannot now fault the Committee for taking the time necessary to do so."

He describes the administration's understanding of their responsibilities and required showings as "perplexing" and "confused."

Judge Bates reasoned that the public interest in seeing the Committee complete its investigation before this Congress expires is "more concrete" and better served by denying a stay.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers said he plans to promptly hold a hearing in which Miers and Bolten will testify under oath, and in which documents about the U.S. Attorney firings are to be produced. Conyers said, "Today's ruling clearly rejects the White House's efforts to run out the clock on the Committee's investigation of DOJ politicization this Congress."

The ruling clearly rejects those efforts, but chances are, what we will see is two White House cronies sitting at a table and repeating claims of executive privilege to each and every question posed by a frustrated, impotent Congress.

It's sad when we actually have to hope that these criminals don't show up to the hearing so Congress will finally be shamed into using its inherent contempt authority to arrest them and hold them in the basement of the Capitol until they decide to comply.

 

JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office. "I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American." Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music. His stories have appeared in Political Affairs Magazine, ACLU FreedomWire, Online Journal, Infowars, Prison Planet, OpEd News, Consortium News, The Intelligence Daily, Democratic Underground, Truthdig, The Memory Hole, Wired, World Prout Assembly, and local publications.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

Currently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolevee.com
Mr MCurrently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolevee.com

Good News - Bad News

You summed up this article in your last two paragraphs:

The ruling clearly rejects those efforts, but chances are, what we will see is two White House cronies sitting at a table and repeating claims of executive privilege to each and every question posed by a frustrated, impotent Congress.

It's sad when we actually have to hope that these criminals don't show up to the hearing so Congress will finally be shamed into using its inherent contempt authority to arrest them and hold them in the basement of the Capitol until they decide to comply."

Of course it could even get worse than that, how does one shame the shameless? Giving their propensity to ignore and treat us with disdain, what's to say they don't give us lame excuses just to continue this farce until the next false-flag attack takes our attention away?

I simply have lost all respect for these so-called representatives of the people. It's gotten to the point if they indeed did do some resembling their job I would be looking behind their actions for what they're trying to hide.

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 51 diaries, 2028 comments) on Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 3:05:14 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Breaking The Real "Last Taboo" - The Things No One Dares To Say by Frank Schaeffer

John S. Greenway by AJ Buttacavoli

Cancer Full Moon January 10-11 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Who is Black America's Moral Emissary to the World? by Glen Ford

Unlawful Assembly by David Swanson

Amnesty vs. AIPAC: Senate to Consider AIPAC Resolution Endorsing War in Gaza by Robert Naiman

Boot Bush on 19th by David Swanson

Will There Be a Recovery? by Paul Craig Roberts

Orangutans Hate Changes in Their Cages by Stephen Pizzo

Where Lies Truth in the Land of Lies? by Rowan Wolf

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009