Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

It's Time to Choose: Democracy or Plutocracy?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 2/19/13

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

The ease with which Harry Reid capitulated to Mitch McConnell on filibuster reform has me worried about a lot of things concerning the Democratic Party, in particular the elections in 2014 and beyond.

Our nation's method of electing candidates is seriously flawed, what with the antiquated electoral college system, GOP voter purging, voting rule manipulation, gerrymandering,  private voting machines without paper trails, freewheeling campaign financing, and other tricks which make the prospect of electing progressive Democrats  somewhat akin to running through a minefield of Diebold voting machines. In no way can the Democratic Party afford to passively sit back when it comes to fair and democratic elections.

Of immediate concern to me is the cost of getting elected, which was made considerably worse by the horrendous Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court in 2010 that essentially took away any restrictions on campaign funding, without even ensuring (at the very least) full disclosure.

by barryelevine

There was buzz about it last year, but of late the subject has taken a back seat to other Republican election trickery. Another complicating factor is that despite the influx of billions of dollars into the election campaign last year, the strategy mostly failed. President Obama managed to achieve a decisive victory, and much of the billionaire-funded right-wing Super PAC money seemed to have gone to waste. Thanks to Obama and the Democrats' victories, there is more complacency among Democrats on this issue, so that election finance reform is seen as less urgent than more recent GOP tricks and manipulation.

Democrats will ignore campaign finance at their own peril. I believe 2012 was an anomaly. We can't count on a strong Democratic incumbent/weak Republican opponent scenario in upcoming elections. The Obama campaign team had an extraordinary organization, which built on its successes in 2008 and wasn't afraid to go hat in hand to big corporations and other wealthy contributors.  With good reason, as those with the largest campaign chest have historically done better than underfunded opponents.  As well as Democrats in Congress succeeded in this past election cycle, there is no way of knowing how much better they should and would have done without the heavy influx of corporate cash available to their GOP opponents.

President Obama failed to mention campaign finance reform in his 2013 State of the Union address, the first of these in which he failed to mention anything about the influence of big money or lobbyists in our political system.

His omission disappointed campaign finance reformers like Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, who said that the president has completely abandoned this important issue. "They have pretty much walked away from, certainly, the campaign finance issue," Wertheimer said. "They've given no indications that they're going to help deal with, without question, what is a fundamental problem for the country."

Campaign finance reformers remember Obama's 2010 State of the Union address, delivered just days after the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. "With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests --- including foreign corporations --- to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said in 2010. (That was when Justice Alito could be seen shaking his head and mouthing "not true.")

Obama went on to say: "I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems."

Now that the president no longer faces re-election, the issue seems to have faded among his priorities. But for Democrats and all Americans it should be a top concern. There are a number of groups working on amending the Constitution to limit the role of money in politics and elections (e.g. Move to Amend). If the American people don't get behind these efforts in a major way, we will continue to be stuck with wealthy Americans and corporations calling the shots when it comes to governing this nation.  It is a warped system that has dragged America down economically, politically and morally, and cries out for a serious fix.

Right now we have government of the wealthy, by the wealthy and for the wealthy. The best way to repair this broken political system is to extricate the mammoth influence of big money from the political process. If Democrats fail to do so, this nation will remain on the fast path to  plutocracy, drifting farther away from what we once recognized as democracy.

Arlen is a writer/blogger living in Monterey, CA. His political blog is He writes a weekly quotation quiz "What's Your QQ?" (Quotation Quotient) for the Monterey Herald, as well as a website and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"No War By Any Nation in Any Age Has Ever Been Declared By the People"

Is the CIA Everywhere? Maybe Your Paranoia is Justified

Which America Do You Live In: Newsweek's "SuperCountry" or Reich's Stalled "Tinder-Box"?

11 Sure-Fire Predictions About the War Against ISIS

The Fed's Unprecedented Generosity

How Occupy Wall Street Helped Obama Win


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
I sense less urgency for campaign finance reform o... by Arlen Grossman on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:17:52 AM
not the solution.  The answer to the question... by George Flower on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:31:23 AM
...overturning Citizens United isn't going to net ... by Jill Herendeen on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:44:19 AM
The fact that the majority of the most heavily fun... by Rick Staggenborg, MD on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:51:12 AM
Hopefully, this author means that for the people o... by Alan MacDonald on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:45:36 PM
Money and greed are responsible for just about eve... by Arlen Grossman on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:14:39 PM
It was used by progressives (e.g., T.Roosevelt) wh... by George Flower on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:37:25 AM
The people have been demanding that Citizens Unite... by Textynn N on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:36:34 PM