Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

It Should Speak Volumes To People

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -
Jon Gold

Years ago in June 2007 when I realized that the focus of the 9/11 Truth Movement was turning more towards the alleged "Controlled Demolition" of the towers and WTC7, I wrote an article entitled, "This Is Not The Controlled Demolition Movement."

In the article, it says "is that what we're known for? Is that what we're all about? I THINK NOT. However, with all of the attention Controlled Demolition gets within this movement, I can understand why someone might think that. Not the media. Lord knows they've helped to create that appearance with their hit pieces THAT FOCUS SOLELY ON WHETHER OR NOT A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE WTC WAS BROUGHT DOWN IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION (emphasis mine). It's easier for the media to deal with us if we're only about one or two issues."

Some examples of this are available here (with exceptions for sure on which theories they focus on): Has anyone else noticed that that has been their formula for years? Their formula that refuses to touch any other subject about 9/11 instead of the theories, like the 9/11 Commission (watch the recent movie on youtube by Skeptic Magazine entitled "You Can't Handle the Truther"). I have (someone like Paul Thompson, Kevin Fenton, Erik Larson, John Judge, and others who have never or rarely ever subscribed to such theories).

In their hit pieces, they won't touch things like former Senator Bob Graham's call for a new investigation (or former 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey joining him). They won't touch things like the September Eleventh Advocates statement, and 9/11 Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds' follow-up pertaining to Behrooz Sarshar. They won't touch this story about "insiders" having doubts about the CIA's role concerning 9/11 (and the follow-up). I have done my best to promote things like this.

Because the media has attacked, misrepresented and slandered advocates for 9/11 Justice for years, and continue to do so, and continue to use that same formula that attacks the most popular theories of the 9/11 Truth Movement while ignoring some of the most incriminating information, I am 100% certain that advocates for 9/11 Justice are, at some level, right. This should speak volumes to people. That the "methinks thou dost protest too much" mentality of our lapdog media, tells us that people like me (responsible advocates for 9/11 Justice), on some level, are right.
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -


I'm a resident of Pennsylvania, on the outskirts of Philadelphia. I've been a web designer/web developer for a little over 11 years now. My hobbies include watching movies, playing video games, reading comic books, and drumming. For the last 9 (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Further Proof 9/11 Needs A Real Investigation

The Facts Speak For Themselves

Dianne Feinstein 911 NSA Narrative Doesn't Cut It

You Can't Point A Finger At Saudi Arabia, And Not Have 5 Fingers Pointing Back To The U.S.

Dom Giordano Mocks Effort To Help 9/11 Families And 9/11 First Responders


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Thank you!... by Jon Gold on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:23:44 AM
Foremost the official United States of America 9/... by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:16:45 AM
I'm not getting into a debate about the buildings.... by Jon Gold on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:12:29 PM
Noted Architect Richard Gage AIA - has evidence of... by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:17:08 PM
Into promoting anything.  I will only promote... by Jon Gold on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:04:44 PM
"Another suspect for the crime of 9/11" - Going to... by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:13:33 PM
Excellent Lance.  Well said.... by Tom Madison on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:03:17 PM
Unfortunately, this is painfully long.This is the ... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:31:24 PM
I do agree with Jon here. The devil is in the deta... by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:55:17 PM
I got a whiff of it when I first heard Louis Farra... by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:20:56 PM
2007 is when I realized that the 9/11 Truth Moveme... by Jon Gold on Monday, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:14:53 PM