Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Is This President that Bad? Really?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/78445643@N07/7024132827/: rageface_obama_not_bad
rageface_obama_not_bad
(image by meme.tn)

Most of the exaggerated offenses being profitably proffered by the right wing propaganda machine are seemingly harmless when examined as single events.

As Phillip Alotta writes, "Just the other day, Fox, aired a segment about the President's failure to issue an Easter Proclamation --ignoring the fact that Bush and Reagan both did the same thing. It was not a fabrication but it was a non-story."

As an individual non-story being disguised as a news item this seems harmless enough. But when added together with a constant stream, its accumulative effect results in a distorted notion of this president's performance.

For instance, in a Washington Post poll, when asked, "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?," 55 percent said No!

Granted this president has succeeded and failed given the circumstances he was handed when he took office. Like his predecessors, he has had to deal with a deck not of his own dealing too. So this is not a rant about how well or not he is doing. It's about the incessant flow of media flotsam and jetsam offered in the place of news.

For instance this story, "President Obama's recitation of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address is sparking hysteria from the right-wing media who slammed the president for omitting the phrase "under God." But ironically, in their hurry to attack the president, they omitted the fact that Obama was reading the first draft of the speech -- a draft that did not include "under God" -- at the request of filmmaker Ken Burns."

My question is, to what end? Why is it necessary to create and report exaggerated offenses that fog the airwaves and make this president look incompetent?

Two reasons I can think of. Reason one, it builds viewership and readership by solidifying the loyalty of those who already consider him to be a failure? In other words, it builds a following? That means numbers and numbers mean advertisers. Of course, you know that advertisers mean more potential profits!

And the second reason is that no one with an ounce of self respect could defend the disastrous performance of the previous Republican administration so the only defense is to create sufficient BS to obfuscate the truth about this president's success at fixing the problems he was handed.

So while a few people get rich in the process and the Republicans can feel a little better about the mess they've created, the country suffers a distorted view that increasingly sickens and further weakens our society.

You see, the most pernicious aspect of this kind of distorted reporting is that although an unimportant incident might contain an element of truth, it is irrelevant. But the fact that there is a truth embedded in the item gives credence to other news items that stretch the truth beyond the breaking point. It's like how easy it is to believe that a person is guilty of a crime if he has a record of arrests even if none of those arrests ever led to a conviction?

Now we have a main stream media that offers false equivalence instead of accurate reporting, leaving   average consumers to choose what truth to believe. Unfortunately, we can now see the results in our inability to elect candidates who are competent and willing to do the business of the people.

As long as we allow ourselves to be duped into believing the negativity surrounding this president we will look to the person most unlike him the next time. And the charade will continue.

Bertrand Russell, gave us this to consider, "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."

So if you are so certain of Mr. Obama's failures, what group of people do you belong to?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Author, columnist and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I am a certified ontological coach. I've studied clinical therapeutic practices in Gestalt psychology and am a Certified Birkman (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

1.  No top bankers prosecuted.2.  Contin... by Robert James on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:17:40 AM
You focus on the "noise," perhaps worse for this m... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26:48 AM
The fakes stories are the focus of this piece; the... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:39:13 PM
Yes, I had no illusions about your focus, just wan... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:33:05 PM
You only have to look back at the Fox-Can-Lie Laws... by kevin walsh on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:52:10 PM
"... no one with an ounce of self respect could de... by Walter F. Wouk on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:44:53 PM
Not an article worth the space, Mr Filippas.  ... by goedel on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:47:49 PM
Who is this Filippas?  I do recall someone na... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:28:53 PM
Thanks for your frank response. While we're being ... by Robert De Filippis on Friday, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:40:02 AM