Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   15 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Is Our Leftist/Socialist Military Setting an Example That Many of Us Don't Want to Admit?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Supported 3   Interesting 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/16/11

Become a Fan
  (108 fans)

What follows here is my summary and interpretation of a NYT column by Nicholas Kristof.

In many ways, our armed forces live by an astonishingly liberal ethos -- and it works.   Our military helped lead the way in racial desegregation, and even today does more to provide equal opportunity to working-class families -- especially to blacks -- than any social program.   It has been an escalator of social mobility in American society because it invests in soldiers and gives them skills and opportunities.  

In a way that America does not, the United States armed forces knits together whites, blacks, Asians and Hispanics from diverse backgrounds, invests in their education and training, provides them with excellent health care and child care.   And it does all this with minimal income gaps:   A senior general earns just 10 times what a private makes, while CEOs at major companies earn more than 300 times as much as those cleaning their offices.   So let's not pretend otherwise:   the military ethos leans way to the left.  

"It's the purest application of socialism there is," Wesley Clark, the retired four-star general and former supreme allied commander of NATO forces in Europe, has stated.

"It's a really fair system, and a lot of thought has been put into it, and people respond to it really well," he added.   The country can learn from that sense of mission, he said, from that emphasis on long-term strategic thinking.  

The military nurtures camaraderie in part because the military looks after its employees.   It features a rare enclave of single-payer universal health care, and it follows that up with a veterans' health care system that is socialist in every sense of the word -- a system that has much lower costs, per patient served, than the American system as a whole.   And patient satisfaction with the service they get is much better than it is among health care recipients as a whole.

Perhaps the most impressive achievement of the American military is not its aircraft carriers, stunning as they are.   Rather, it's the military day care system for working parents.  

While one of America's greatest failings is underinvestment in early childhood education (which seems to be one of the best ways to break cycles of poverty and keep it from replicating one generation after the next), the military manages to provide superb child care.   The cost depends on family income and starts at a very affordable $44 per week.  

"I absolutely think it's a model," (to be followed) said Linda K. Smith, executive director of the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, which advocates for better child care in America.   Ms. Smith, who used to oversee the military day care system before she retired from the Defense Department, said that our military understands that good child care is a strategic necessity to maintain military readiness and to retain highly trained officers.  

One of the most admirable things about the military is the way it invests in educating and training its people.   Its tuition-free universities -- the military academies -- are excellent, and it has ROTC programs at other campuses around the country that are superb.   Many soldiers get medical training, law degrees, or Ph.D.s while in service, sometimes at the country's finest universities.   It's common to hear bromides about investing in human capital, but the military actually shows that it believes in this kind of investment.  

Partly as a result, it manages to retain first-rate officers who could earn far higher salaries in the private sector.   And while the ethic of business is often "Gimme," our socialist military inculcates an ideal of public service that runs deep.   In Afghanistan, for example, soldiers sometimes dig into their own pockets to help provide supplies for local schools.  

As America gropes for new directions in a difficult economic environment, the tendency has been to move toward a corporatist model that sees investments in people as woolly-minded sentimentalism or as unaffordable luxuries.   But our US military shows us otherwise.

So, as the United States armed forces try to pull Iraqi and Afghan societies into the 21st century, maybe they could do the same for America.  

Hoo-ah!

 

http://www.crystalclearcommunications.net/

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Of course, along with the benefits, you also give ... by Terry McGovern on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:23:16 PM
Living in a military dictatorship is, of course, n... by Richard Clark on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:45:23 PM
It's just that using the military as an example of... by Terry McGovern on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:07:44 PM
 propaganda by the government , businesses, p... by bogi666 on Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:25:00 AM
....is necessary for socialism. Namely, the one th... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:38:44 AM
. . their median wages and incomes are higher than... by Richard Clark on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:52:13 PM
It's refreshing to see the beginning of understand... by Darren Wolfe on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:39:18 PM
<<< We must end the income tax, the fed... by Richard Clark on Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:52:59 PM
You can only come to that conclusion by ignoring 2... by Darren Wolfe on Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:55:39 AM
for sharing the International libertarian web site... by Jody Walker on Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:31:41 PM
Thanks... by bogi666 on Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:59:28 AM
New York Times Columnist Nicholas Kristof: The Mil... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:39:46 AM
In a rather unusual way, the U.S. military has ... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:18:06 AM
Interesting observations.  These points have ... by Bruce Morgan on Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:49:20 AM
It's all in the execution, though. Europe is not t... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:53:18 AM