Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Is Obama About to Betray Those Who Re-Elected Him Less than 2 Months Ago?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/25/12

One of the most contentious issues in the current "fiscal cliff" negotiations that's angering progressive activists is President Obama 's offer to the GOP to change the way cost-of-living adjustments are made to Social Security benefits. According to economists working with the group Social Security Works, moving to what is called a "chained" consumer price index will reduce benefits for the average 65-year-old by about $6,000 in the first 15 years of retirement, and $16,000 over 25 years.

I'm not surprised, but still angry. Obama has always been a failure as a negotiator with Republicans. He reliably makes major concessions before negotiations even begin -- and in exchange for little or nothing from the other side.

In this case, there's no excuse for concessions like the chained CPI on Social Security. First, by law, Social Security contributes not one thin dime to the nation's deficit. The fact that Social Security is on the table at all in the fiscal cliff talks is indefensible. But apart from that fact, poll after poll tell us that 60 to 70 percent of the nation (including Republicans) oppose benefit cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Further polling tells us that a majority of Americans say they will blame Republicans if there's no deal - and taxes go up before the fiscal cliff deadline on Jan. 1. If a deal is not reached before the end of the year, the GOP will be forced to approve legislation reinstating tax cuts for the middle class in the early days of the new Congress.

More importantly, there are many alternatives to pulling the trigger on the chained CPI. Richard Eskow of the Campaign for America's Future has summarized practical ways to produce revenue and make budget cuts that don't place the burden on poor and working families, which are summarized in his article, 8 Deficit Reducers That Are More Ethical -- And More Effective -- Than the "Chained CPI".

If Obama had any true leadership qualities, core beliefs or a spine, he'd rally the nation to protect social safety-net programs while standing by his previous pledge to impose tax-rate increases on those making $250,000 or more a year. If he did use the power of his office to wage this fight, he'd have the support of a strong majority of the nation, and likely force the Republicans to cave.

And if they didn't concede, Obama and the Democrats could rally voters to punish the GOP in the 2014 mid-term election. It's a perfect storm against the right-wing, which predictably the Democrats are poised to squander without a fight.

Obama, trying to meet GOP House Speaker John Boehner somewhere in the middle, has already backed down on his tax pledge, moving away from his campaign "line in the sand," demanding higher tax rates on those making more than $250,000. He's now proposed limiting higher rates to those that make $400,000 or more -- and that will likely move up further to $500,000 or higher before it's all over.

Like the "team player" she is, Nancy Pelosi, despite her repeated promises during the 2012 election campaign to protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits, is backing Obama on the chained CPI. Can Nancy spell the word "hypocrite"?

The politics of "compromise," a more benign word for targeting the nation's most vulnerable elderly, sick and politically weak citizens, is "exhibit A" in explaining why the majority of people in the U.S. are disgusted with politicians and politics. The permanent government bought and paid for by the 1 percent usually wins and the rest of us usually lose.

Our only hope is an independent, militant progressive protest movement -- divorced from the Democratic Party -- that can quickly mobilize masses of people in the street to demand the government do what the majority of people want, restoring some semblance of democracy.

I think I'll give the Occupy Wall Street movement a call to see what they're doing next week...

Scott Harris is executive producer of Between The Lines Radio Newsmagazine, a weekly, syndicated public affairs program. http://btlonline.org ;   email: Email address removed

 

Executive Producer Between The Lines Radio Newsmagazine

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is Obama About to Betray Those Who Re-Elected Him Less than 2 Months Ago?

Single-Payer Healthcare Advocates Protesting Exclusion from Congressional Debate Arrested

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

In answer to your question.Obama is getting ready ... by kappie on Tuesday, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:20:06 AM
We need to oppose any cut in benefits, vigorously.... by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:20:58 PM
Perhaps Obama's core beliefs ARE that he wants to ... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Wednesday, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:34:11 AM