Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
16 comments

Life Arts

Is Darwinian Evolution a Complete Explanation of Life?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 4/4/13
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

opednews.com

(Article changed on April 4, 2013 at 11:00)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/45957413@N05/8494237064/: small-DSC_0689 charles darwin
small-DSC_0689 charles darwin by Gêro

I recently posted an article titled, God, Evolution And The Goal Oriented Universe. This column will add a bit more detail to my suspicion that we may live in a teleological (goal oriented) universe. Please keep in mind that I am not arguing for or against an intelligent designer. Further, I am not a scientist, so my view is more philosophical than scientific. Tending toward instrumentalism, I write about what I think is useful rather than a comprehensive explanation of objective reality.

From Charles Q. Choi, of Scientific American, "Billions of years ago, organic chemicals in the primordial soup somehow organized themselves into the first organisms. A few years ago scientists found that something similar happens every once in awhile in the cells of all living things: bits of once-quiet stretches of   DNA sometimes spontaneously assemble themselves into genes. Such "de novo" genes may go on to play significant roles in the evolution of individual organisms--even humans."

This discovery causes one to question if Neo-Darwinian theory is a complete and comprehensive explanation for the evolution of life. By way of review:   

Neo-Darwinian evolution maintains that heritable characteristics are passed on to progeny. Of course, they must survive and reproduce if heredity is to be successful. In the process of reproduction, certain mutations will occur. If those mutations provide an adaptive advantage in a particular niche, the organism will flourish.

This implies that evolution is acausal and random. But it also implies the environment influences evolution by providing niches that allow for survival of those organisms best suited for each niche. In addition to de novo genes, there's more.

We now know there are other factors that can shape evolution by affecting how a gene expresses. This process is being called epigenetic. Because the process seems to be an emergent property of normal genetic evolution but not due to direct inheritance of genetic characteristics.  

Now, Dr. Stuart Kauffman has a new, and third question to consider; some niches come into existence as a result of another niche that is not necessarily a part of the existing environment. In other words, it is adjacent to the primary niche but just happens to allow for another organism to flourish. It has nothing to do with either an adaptive advantage to fill an existing niche or epigenetic influences.

So let's review:

1.        Evolution is the process of random selection for adaptive advantages for niches that exist in the environment.

2.       Genes spontaneously assemble themselves from once quiet stretches of DNA.

3.       Genes express differently based on epigenetic (external) factors and these modified genes can be conserved through heredity.

4.       Genetic modifications can spontaneously create new adjacent niches that didn't exist in the environment before the modification showed up.

Do these facts support the belief that evolution is acausal? Take just item four; if the unintended adjacent niche provides for the flourishing of another organism, why? Is it purely by accident or is there an overarching goal? I don't know the answer. But I also don't know why this universe is finely tuned to allow for intelligent life to evolve; referred to as the anthropic principle.

In the absence of entailing laws governing the emergence of life, anything is possible. But for some reason, complex life   becomes conscious in a universe that tends toward more, rather than less, entropy.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Author, columnist and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I am a certified ontological coach. I've studied clinical therapeutic practices in Gestalt psychology and am a Certified Birkman (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

First, what evolutionist claims Darwin is the "com... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:06:14 PM
I seem to have a knack for red herrings although, ... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:37:20 PM
I didn't allege intentionality, just showing off m... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:06:41 PM
I do so enjoy your feedback. But to be sure, I don... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:02:20 PM
I am not making complex arguments here so if I am ... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:56:30 PM
I believe that I have good reason to believe that ... by Rick Ryals on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:13:05 PM
and related topics. "Darwin's theory" has long evo... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:04:55 PM
Thank you for your thoughtful response. You touch ... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:43:13 PM
You state, "Please keep in mind that I am not arg... by Burl Hall on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:02:56 AM
Thanks for your response. Very nicely stated.... by Robert De Filippis on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:27:03 AM
Robert, thanks for reading. Burl... by Burl Hall on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:14:43 PM
A couple of simple points: Darwin didn't discover ... by Paul Carline on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:31:36 AM
Interesting take on the issue. Thanks.... by Robert De Filippis on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:29:00 AM
I would add that "Darwinian evolution" is not the ... by John Moffett on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:42:36 AM
a rather recent addition to the quandary, a PRODUC... by molly cruz on Friday, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:59:45 PM
In my study, as science and spirituality overlap w... by Cynthia Piano on Sunday, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:00:36 AM